McCullough, Jonathan v. Tenneco Automotive , 2022 TN WC 52 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                   FILED
    Jul 08, 2022
    01:53 PM(CT)
    TENNESSEE COURT OF
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT COOKEVILLE
    JONATHAN MCCULLOUGH,                       ) Docket No. 2021-04-0323
    Employee,                          )
    v.                                         )
    )
    TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE,                        ) State File No. 92082-2021
    Employer,                           )
    and                                        )
    )
    INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO.                    ) Judge Dale Tipps
    OF NORTH AMERICA,                          )
    Insurance Carrier.             )
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS
    The Court held an Expedited Hearing on July 7, 2022, to determine whether Mr.
    McCullough is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits. The Court finds the
    evidence does not support Mr. McCullough’s contention that his alleged workplace fall
    was the primary cause of his current back symptoms. Therefore, the Court cannot hold
    that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.
    History of Claim
    Mr. McCullough alleged he slipped and fell in the bathroom at work on October 1,
    2021. He testified that a few minutes after returning to his job, his back began hurting.
    Because he had a long history of back injuries, he felt he needed medical attention, so he
    reported the injury to his supervisor and went to the emergency room.
    When Tenneco disputed the accident occurred as he described and denied the claim,
    Mr. McCullough sought unauthorized treatment with Dr. Narendra Singh.
    Neither party offered medical records as evidence, but Tenneco submitted a
    questionnaire completed by Dr. Singh. In response to whether Mr. McCullough’s
    treatment for his back complaints was primarily related to his work accident, Dr. Singh
    checked “No.” He added, “It is my opinion that the majority of his spine complaints are
    currently related to underlying degenerative changes and facet joint disease.”
    At the conclusion of the hearing, Mr. McCullough requested medical treatment and
    temporary disability benefits. Tenneco contended that Mr. McCullough was not entitled
    to any benefits because he presented no medical proof that his employment was the primary
    cause of his condition.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    For the Court to grant Mr. McCullough’s requests, he must prove he is likely to
    prevail at a hearing on the merits. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239
    (d)(1) (2021); McCord v.
    Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar.
    27, 2015).
    To prove that his back condition is a compensable injury, Mr. McCullough must
    show that it arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of his employment. This
    includes the requirement that he must show “to a reasonable degree of medical certainty
    that [the incident] contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the . . . disablement
    or need for medical treatment, considering all causes.” “Shown to a reasonable degree of
    medical certainty” means that, in the opinion of the treating physician, it is more likely than
    not considering all causes as opposed to speculation or possibility. 
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50
    -
    6-102(14).
    Applying this standard to Mr. McCullough’s claim, the Court has only one medical
    causation opinion – Dr. Singh’s conclusion that his symptoms were not primarily caused
    by his alleged work accident, but by his pre-existing condition. Without a contrary opinion,
    the analysis ends, and the Court cannot find Mr. McCullough is likely to prove a
    compensable claim.1 See Berdnik v. Fairfield Glad Cmty. Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp.
    App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *14-16 (May 18, 2017) (where an employer has presented expert
    medical proof that the employee's condition is not work-related, the employee must present
    expert medical proof that the alleged injury is causally related to the employment).
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Mr. McCullough’s claims against Tenneco Automotive for medical and temporary
    disability benefits are denied at this time.
    2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on September 14, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. You
    1
    Because the claim is denied on causation grounds, the Court will not address the dispute over the accident
    details at this time.
    must call toll-free at 855-874-0473 to participate. Failure to call might result in a
    determination of the issues without your further participation. All conferences are
    set using Central Time.
    ENTERED July 8, 2022.
    ______________________________________
    DALE TIPPS, JUDGE
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    Exhibits:
    1. Mr. McCullough’s Rule 72 Declaration
    2. Affidavit of Michael Howard (identification only)
    3. Affidavit of Dallas Jones (identification only)
    4. First Report of Injury
    5. Dr. Narendra Singh’s responses to medical questionnaire
    6. Wage Statement
    Technical record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3. Request for Expedited Hearing
    4. Employer’s Pre-Expedited Hearing Brief
    5. Employer’s Exhibit List
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent as indicated on July 8,
    2022.
    Name                       Certified   Fax     Email    Service sent to:
    Mail
    Jonathan McCullough,                             X      mcculloughjonathan8@gmail.com
    Employee
    Sarah H. Reisner,                                X      sreisner@manierherod.com
    Jasmyn McCalla,                                         jmccalla@manierherod.com
    Employer’s Attorneys
    ______________________________________
    PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov
    Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
    If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the
    Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the
    date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must
    serve a copy upon all parties.
    2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
    calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
    any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
    alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
    website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
    completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
    result in dismissal of the appeal.
    3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
    from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
    the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
    it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
    parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
    the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
    Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
    Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
    concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
    a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.
    4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
    business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
    party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
    days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
    statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
    expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
    the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
    argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.
    For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
    NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
    www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/
    wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667
    Docket No.: ________________________
    State File No.: ______________________
    Date of Injury: _____________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employee
    v.
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    Employer
    Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________
    [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]
    appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the
    Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-
    stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):
    □ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________
    □ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________
    issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.
    Statement of the Issues on Appeal
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________________________
    Parties
    Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________
    Email: __________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________
    Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20                              Page 1 of 2                                              RDA 11082
    Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________
    Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee
    Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________
    Email: _________________________________________________________
    Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________
    Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________
    Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a
    true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described
    in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this
    case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.
    ______________________________________________
    [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 01/20                                 Page 2 of 2                                        RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021-04-0323

Citation Numbers: 2022 TN WC 52

Judges: Dale Tipps

Filed Date: 7/8/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/8/2022