Diana, Annicia v. ABM Industries, Inc. , 2017 TN WC 12 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                    FILED
    February l t 2017
    TN COURTOF
    l\'ORKIRS' 'C 01IPENSAIION
    CLAIMS
    Tim.e 10:57 .A.M
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT KNOXVILLE
    ANNICIA C. DIANA                                          Docket No.: 2015-03-0506
    Employee,
    v.
    ABM INDUSTRIES, INC.                                      State File No.: 50641-2015
    Employer,
    And
    INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. OF                                Judge Lisa Lowe Knott
    NORTH AMERICA,
    Carrier.
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
    DENYING ADDITIONAL MEDICAL BENEFITS
    This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge for
    Expedited Hearing on January 17, 2017. The current legal issue involves the causal
    relationship between Ms. Diana's radial nerve palsy and the work injury, as well as the
    medical necessity of additional diagnostic testing. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the
    Court finds Ms. Diana did not come forward with sufficient evidence to establish she is
    likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that her radial nerve palsy causally relates to
    her work injury at ABM.
    History of Claim
    ABM employed Ms. Diana as a sanitation worker cleaning machines. On June 30,
    2015, while Ms. Diana used a scraper to remove dough off the dividers of a bread-
    making machine, the machine started and the belts began to move. This caused Ms.
    Diana to sustain a crush injury to her left wrist. After treatment at the University of
    Tennessee Medical Center, she received directions to follow-up with University
    1
    ABM asse1ted Ms. Diana's claim should be denied pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 50-6-
    11 O(a)( 4) (20 16) for failure to follow the safety procedure known as " lock out/tag out." However, the
    Court finds it unnecessary to rule on the safety defense at this time, since the current issue is limited to
    additional medical benefits and the Court has denied those benefits.
    Orthopedic Surgeons.
    ABM provided a panel of physicians, from which Ms. Diana selected Dr. Grant C.
    Shirley at Nova Medical Center. Dr. Shirley ordered diagnostic testing, which revealed
    no fractures or dislocations, and recommended consultation with an orthopedic hand
    surgeon.
    ABM circulated a panel of physicians, from which Ms. Diana selected Dr. John
    M. Ambrosia. Dr. Ambrosia diagnosed Ms. Diana with a left hand abrasion and radial
    nerve palsy. He noted, "I am not sure how the radial nerve palsy is related to her
    abrasion or hand injury." Upon follow-up, Dr. Ambrosia noted that Ms. Diana continued
    to have full-blown left radial nerve palsy with inability to extend the left wrist and left
    fingers. He recommended an EMG/NCS. Based upon Dr. Ambrosia's statement
    questioning the relatedness of Ms. Diana's radial nerve palsy to her work injury, ABM
    denied the request for the EMG/NCS. In his deposition, Dr. Ambrosia said, "My feeling
    was I could not really put that together with the hand injury per se. I wasn't sure how the
    radial nerve palsy could be related_ to the abrasion and I explained that to her." He also
    testified, "I just don't see that being a mechanism that could directly or indirectly apply
    pressure to the nerve and cause this type of a profound nerve function." Ms. Diana
    asserted that Dr. Ambrosia's causation opinion is flawed because he acknowledged that
    the EMG/NCS would be "a helpful piece of information" to determine the location of her
    nerve injury. ABM asserted Dr. Ambrosia's opinion that Ms. Diana's radial nerve palsy
    was not caused by the work injury is presumed correct under Tennessee law.
    Subsequently, Ms. Diana obtained her own independent medical evaluation with
    Dr. Thomas Koenig. Ms. Diana attempted to introduce Dr. Koenig's report into
    evidence, but ABM objected on the ground that she failed to provide a medical
    certification and Dr. Koenig did not sign the report. The Court sustained the objection
    and marked the report for identification purposes only as Exhibit 10.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    The following legal principles govern this case. Because this case is in a posture
    of an Expedited Hearing, Ms. Diana need not prove every element of her claim by a
    preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief. McCord v. Advantage Human
    Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
    Instead, she must come forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court might
    determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Id.; Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-
    239(d)(l) (2016).
    Workers' Compensation Law requires employers to provide injured employees
    with reasonable and necessary medical care related to the work injury. A work-related
    injury causes a need for medical treatment if, within a reasonable degree of medical
    2
    certainty, it contributed more than 50% to the need for treatment. To meet the
    "reasonable degree of medical certainty" standard requires a physician opinion that it is
    more likely than not, considering all possible causes, as opposed to speculation. See
    Tenn. Code Ann.§§ 50-6-204(a)(l)(A), 50-6-102(14)(C), and 50-6-102(14)(D) (2016).
    Furthermore, the panel-selected physician's causation opinion is presumed correct,
    as is the treatment he recommends. However, that opinion shall be rebutted by a
    preponderance of the evidence. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-6-102(14)(E) and 50-6-
    204(a)(3)(H) (2016); see also Morgan v. Macy's, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS
    39, at *17 (Aug. 31, 2016).
    Here, the current issue is the causal relationship and medical necessity of
    treatment for Ms. Diana's radial nerve palsy, and specifically the EMG/NCS. Ms. Diana
    has the burden of presenting sufficient evidence to show she is likely to prevail at a
    hearing on the merits in establishing that the recommended treatment was causally related
    to and reasonably required as a result of the work injury. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-
    204(b )( 1); see also Coolidge v. City Winery Nashville, LLC, et al., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp.
    App. Bd. LEXIS 46, at *16-17 (Sept. 23, 2016).
    As the authorized treating panel physician, Dr. Ambrosia's causation opinion is
    presumed correct unless overcome by a preponderance of the evidence. Dr. Ambrosia
    indicated he could not associate Ms. Diana's radial nerve palsy to the work injury. He
    explained that trauma could cause it but the most common scenario is when someone has
    pressure applied to the radial nerve in the upper arm. (Ex. 15 at 14, 16.) Ms. Diana's
    work injury resulted in pressure and/or trauma to her wrist and hand. !d. at 16, 17.
    Admittedly, Dr. Ambrosia testified that the nerve tests would provide a "helpful piece of
    information." !d. at 18. However, he did not conclude that the tests were medically
    necessary as a result of the work injury. Since the Court excluded Dr. Koenig's opinion,
    Ms. Diana failed to rebut Dr. Ambrosia's opinion by a preponderance of the evidence.
    Therefore, Ms. Diana has not come forward with sufficient evidence from which
    this Court concludes that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Her request
    for the recommended nerve tests is denied at this time.
    ENTERED this the 1st day ofFebrua ~               IAPM       ~
    HON. LISA LOWE KNOTT
    Workers' Compensation Judge
    3
    APPENDIX
    Technical Record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3. Show Cause Order
    4. Employee's Motion to Vacate Show Cause Order
    5. Employer's Motion for Initial Hearing
    6. Initial Hearing Order
    7. Amended Initial Hearing Order
    8. Joint Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines and Compensation Hearing
    9. Amended Initial Hearing Order
    10. Agreed Order Extending Discovery Deadlines and Compensation Hearing
    11. Request for Expedited Hearing
    12. Employee's Motion to Compel Benefits
    13. Notice of Filing Dr. Ambrosia's deposition
    14. Notice of Filing Dan Swisher's deposition
    15. Motion to Amend Pleadings
    16.Employer's Brief
    17. Employer's Statement of Witnesses, Documents, and Opposition of Relief
    18. Order to Amend Pleadings
    19.Amended Notice of Filing Dr. Ambrosia's deposition
    Exhibits:
    1. Affidavit of Annicia C. Diana
    2. Panel of Physicians, Form C-42 with Nova selection
    3. Panel of Physicians, Form C-42 with Ambrosia selection
    4. ABM Industries' Employee's Responsibilities for Work Related Injuries
    5. ABM Industries' Return to Work Policy
    6. ABM Industries' Employee Record of Injury/Illness Form
    7. ABM Industries' Health Access Information Sheet
    8. ABM Industries' Training Record (Collective)
    9. Pinnacle Home Equipment Orthopedic Supply & Delivery Form
    10. Medical Records of Dr. Thomas M. Koenig, Tennessee Valley Orthopedics
    marked for identification purposes only
    11. Medical Records of Dr. John M. Ambrosia, Knoxville Orthopedic Clinic
    12. Appointment List of Results Physiotherapy
    13.Medical Records ofDr. Grant C. Shirley/Nova
    14. Deposition of Dan Swisher
    15. Deposition of Dr. John Ambrosia
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
    sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on this the 1st day of
    February, 2017.
    Name                       Certified Via        Via     Service sent to:
    Mail      Fax        Email
    Ameesh A. Kherani,                              X       akherani@daviddunaway .com
    Esq.,
    EmEloyee' s Attorne~
    David J. Deming, Esq.                           X       ddeming@manierherod.com
    Employer's Attorney
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2015-03-0506

Citation Numbers: 2017 TN WC 12

Judges: Lisa Lowe Knott

Filed Date: 2/1/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/9/2021