Foust, Jr., David v. Pinnacle Delivery Service , 2017 TN WC 187 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • FILED
    October 3, 2017
    TN COURT OF
    WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    Time: 11:05 PM
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT KNOXVILLE
    DAVID MICHAEL FOUST, JR., Docket No. 2017-03-0832
    Employee,
    v.
    PINNACLE DELIVERY SERVICE,
    )
    )
    ) State File No. 54975-2017
    )
    Uninsured Employer. )
    Judge Pamela B. Johnson
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
    DENYING WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BENEFITS
    This matter came before the undersigned Workers’ Compensation Judge on
    September 27, 2017, for an Expedited Hearing. The central legal issues are (1) whether
    David Michael Foust, Jr. demonstrated he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits
    that he was an employee of Pinnacle Delivery Service and (2) if so, whether Mr. Foust
    sufficiently demonstrated his injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of
    his employment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds Mr. Foust is likely to
    prevail in establishing he was an employee of Pinnacle; however, he failed to
    demonstrate his injury arose primarily out of his employment. Therefore, the Court
    denies his claim at this time.
    History of Claim
    On July 6, 2017, Mr. Foust alleged he and coworker Melinda Mills delivered
    flooring to a local residence in west Knoxville, Tennessee. While moving a 1,700-pound
    pallet up a steep incline, Mr. Foust slipped, fell, and injured his left knee. The same day,
    he reported the injury to Pinnacle’s office manager, Mike McCoy. Mr. Foust testified
    that he may be wrong on the date and the incident may have occurred on July 5, 7, 8, or
    9. Pinnacle’s bills of lading indicated Mr. Foust made deliveries with driver Tony Mills
    on July 6 in Crossville, Tennessee and surrounding towns; Mr. Foust did not make any
    deliveries in Knoxville that day. Pinnacle’s bills of lading for July 7 showed Mr. Foust
    made deliveries in Byrdstown, Tennessee; Mr. Foust did not make any deliveries in
    Knoxville that day. According to the Expedited Request for Investigation report, Ms.
    Mills denied that Mr. Foust rode with her when he was injured.
    il
    On July 13, Mr. Foust saw Nurse Practitioner Christina Sanks at Cherokee Health
    Systems and reported he injured his /eft knee at work two weeks ago while pulling a
    pallet jack of flooring up a steep incline. He further reported that he kept aggravating his
    knee as he continued to work. Following examination of the right knee, Nurse Sanks
    diagnosed Mr. Foust with acute right knee pain and ordered x-rays. Nurse Sanks placed
    Mr. Foust off work at that time. The next day, Mr. Foust completed x-rays of his left
    knee at Outpatient Diagnostic Center, which demonstrated negative findings. Mr.
    Foust’s medical providers subsequently recommended an MRI, but Mr. Foust did not
    obtain the test due to lack of funds. On July 25, Mr. Foust sought care at the University
    of Tennessee Medical Center emergency department. Physician’s Assistant Gregory A.
    Finch diagnosed left knee pain and discharged Mr. Foust with prescriptions for
    Meloxicam and Prednisone.
    Mr. Foust continued working for Pinnacle following the work incident, despite
    doctor’s orders to remain off work. He worked most of July and some in August. He
    received his last paycheck from Pinnacle on August 12. Since then, he has not worked
    due to pain and difficulty walking.
    Regarding the employment relationship, Mr. Foust testified he began working for
    Pinnacle in 2015 as a W-2 employee. In the spring of 2016, he transitioned to a 1099
    worker, and Pinnacle did not withhold taxes. As a 1099 driver, Mr. Foust received $575
    straight pay per week. Following several accidents in the company truck, Mr. Foust lost
    the ability to drive and rode as a passenger to help another driver make deliveries. He
    earned $500 straight pay per week as a helper, and Pinnacle deducted $100 per day for
    any day not worked.
    Greg Dupes, sole owner and proprietor of Pinnacle, testified Pinnacle owned the
    delivery trucks and leased the trucks to drivers.’ Pinnacle also owned all the delivery
    equipment. Pinnacle paid for the fuel, repairs, insurance, and maintenance costs.
    The Expedited Request for Investigation Report stated eight individuals worked
    for Pinnacle in varying capacities. All eight workers received 1099 straight pay with
    deductions for days missed. Pinnacle scheduled the deliveries but gave workers a choice
    of available delivery routes. Pinnacle controlled the power to terminate workers and also
    required Mr. Foust and his co-workers to wear a uniform bearing the company name.
    Pinnacle did not carry workers’ compensation insurance, claiming that its workers were
    all independent contractors not employees.
    'Mr. Foust testified that he appeared for x-rays and Outpatient Diagnostic personnel indicated Nurse
    Sanks ordered right knee x-rays. He advised Outpatient Diagnostics that he injured his left knee.
    Outpatient Diagnostics personnel contacted Nurse Sanks’ office, which then ordered left knee x-rays.
    * Pinnacle did not introduce any lease agreements.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    At an Expedited Hearing, Mr. Foust must come forward with sufficient evidence
    from which this Court can determine that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.
    See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6,
    at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
    (1) Mr. Foust demonstrated he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits he was an
    employee of Pinnacle Delivery Service
    The Workers’ Compensation Law instructs the Court to consider the following
    factors when determining whether an injured worker is an employee or an independent
    contractor:
    (a) The right to control the conduct of the work;
    (b) The right of termination;
    (c) The method of payment;
    (d) The freedom to select and hire helpers;
    (e) The furnishing of tools and equipment;
    (f) Self-scheduling of working hours; and
    (g) The freedom to offer services to other entities.
    Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(12)(D)(i) (2016). No single aspect of a work relationship is
    conclusive in making this determination, and in deciding whether a worker is an
    employee or independent contractor, “the trier of fact must examine all relevant factors
    and circumstances” of the relationship. Smiley v. Four Seasons Coach Leasing, Inc., et
    al., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *10-11 (July 15, 2016). The fact that a
    company did not deduct social security or income taxes is not a controlling factor in
    deciding whether an employer-employee relationship existed. Jd.
    Here, the factors demonstrate Mr. Foust was an employee of Pinnacle when
    considering all relevant factors and circumstances of the relationship. Pinnacle controlled
    the deliveries and the right to hire and fire helpers. Pinnacle also owned the delivery
    trucks and delivery equipment and paid for the fuel, repairs, insurance, and maintenance
    costs. Payment by 1099 without withholding taxes is not controlling when the Court
    considers the totality of the evidence. The Court finds Mr. Foust was an employee of
    Pinnacle for workers’ compensation purposes. Thus, the Court holds Mr. Foust came
    forward with sufficient evidence demonstrating he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the
    merits in establishing he was an employee of Pinnacle. The Court makes no finding as to
    whether a covered employment exists under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-
    106.
    (2) Mr. Foust failed to demonstrate his injury arose primarily out of and in the course
    and scope of his employment with Pinnacle Delivery Service
    An injury must arise primarily out of and occur in the course and scope of the
    employment to be compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Law. See Tenn. Code
    Ann. § 50-6-102(14). The term “injury” is defined as “an injury by accident . . . arising
    primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, that causes death,
    disablement or the need for medical treatment of the employee.”
    Id. For an injury
    to be
    accidental, it must be “caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, arising primarily
    out of and in the course and scope of employment, and is identifiable by time and place
    of occurrence.” Jd.
    The record is unclear when and where the alleged work incident occurred. Mr.
    Foust testified he injured himself in west Knoxville, Tennessee, when he pushed a pallet
    up a steep incline. He indicated the incident occurred on July 6, 2017, while working
    with Melinda Mills. Ms. Mills denied she worked with Mr. Foust when he injured
    himself. Pinnacle bills of lading demonstrated Mr. Foust did not work in Knoxville,
    Tennessee on either July 6 or 7. Mr. Foust admitted that he could be wrong on the date;
    the incident may have occurred on July 5, 7, 8, or 9. The July 13 office note from
    Cherokee Health indicated Mr. Foust reported the work incident happened two weeks
    prior to the visit. Based upon the evidence available at this time, the Court must conclude
    that Mr. Foust failed to demonstrate he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits
    proving a specific incident, identifiable by time and place of occurrence.
    Therefore, as a matter of law, the Court denies Mr. Foust’s request for benefits at
    this time.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Mr. Foust’s claim against Pinnacle Delivery Services for the requested benefits is
    denied at this time.
    2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on December 14, 2017, at 9:30 a.m.
    Eastern Time. The parties must call 865-594-0091 or 855-543-5041 toll-free to
    participate in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may result
    in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.
    ENTERED the 3rd day of October, 2017.
    Ke PMc
    PAMELA B. JOHNSON, JUDGE
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    APPENDIX
    Technical Record:
    1.
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3.
    4. Notice of Filing
    Petition for Benefit Determination
    Request for Expedited Hearing
    The Court did not consider attachments to Technical Record filings unless
    admitted into evidence during the Expedited Hearing. The Court considered factual
    statements in these filings or any attachments to them as allegations unless established by
    the evidence.
    Exhibits:
    9.
    SN DAR WN >
    Affidavit of David Michael Foust, Jr.
    Expedited Request for Investigation Report
    Medical Record of Cherokee Health Systems
    Medical Record of Outpatient Diagnostic Center
    Medical Record of University of Tennessee Medical Center
    Wage Records
    July 6, 2017 Bills of Lading, Map, Driving Directions, and Distances
    Sprint Telephone Records for July 6 and 7, 2017, and Text Message
    Text Messages on July 17, 2017
    10. July 7, 2017 Bills of Lading
    11. Text Message
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
    sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on the 3rd day of
    October, 2017.
    Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to:
    Mail
    Glen B. Rutherford, xX erutherford@knoxlawyers.com
    Employee’s Attorney
    Pinnacle Delivery xX X | Greg Dupes, owner
    Service,
    Self-Represented
    Employer
    2132 Bainbridge Way
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37849
    g.dupes@pinnacledeliveryservice.com
    PO Sheer! pesca
    PENNY SHIRUM, Court Clerk ‘
    WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-03-0832

Citation Numbers: 2017 TN WC 187

Judges: Pamela B. Johnson

Filed Date: 10/3/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/26/2020