Maaitah, Cynthia L. v. Raymond James Financial ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                             FILED
    January 29, 2018
    TN COURTOF
    W ORKERS' COl\IPENSATION
    CL.illiS
    Tim!!>3:2.3PM
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT MEMPHIS
    CYNTHIA L. MAAITAH,                                      )    Docket No.: 2017-08-0628
    Employee,                                       )
    v.                                                       )
    RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL,                                 )    State File No.: 41107-2017
    Employer,                                        )
    And                                                      )
    AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF                                 )    Judge Deana Seymour
    PA/CNA,                                                  )
    Insurance Carrier.
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING MEDICAL AND TEMPORARY
    DISABILITY BENEFITS
    Cynthia Maaitah claimed spiders bit her multiple times in her genital area and the
    creases of her legs while working for Raymond James Financial between March and June
    2016. She requested medical and temporary disability benefits. Raymond James
    contested the compensability of her claim. The Court conducted an expedited hearing on
    January 19, 2018, and holds Ms. Maaitah did not prove a likelihood of success on the
    merits of her claim at this interlocutory stage. Therefore, the Court denies the requested
    workers' compensation benefits.
    History of Claim
    Ms. Maaitah worked as an administrative assistant for Raymond James on June
    13, 2016, when she asked her supervisor, Vicki Douglas, for permission to treat at Coast
    to Coast Medical for spider bites she claimed she received at work three days earlier. Ms.
    Douglas granted permission, and Ms. Maaitah saw Advanced Practice Nurse Lisa
    Schafer. 1
    Ms. Maaitah complained of pain and chills. She described a history of spider bites
    to her genitals and reported she felt she was "being attacked." Ms. Maaitah told Nurse
    1
    Ms. Maaitah testified she reported the claim to Raymond James on June l 0, but Ms. Douglas testified Ms. Maaitah
    first notified her by calling from Coast to Coast on June 13.
    1
    Schafer she thought a spider bit her at work; however, she also had spiders at home.
    Nurse Schafer diagnosed non-work-related contact dermatitis and released her to work
    without restrictions. The only other medical records presented showed a prior history of
    genital lesions and a vulvar abscess related to "shaving."
    Ms. Maaitah believed spiders were causing her symptoms of "feather-like
    sensations" followed by "a horrible pinch and then a painful stab." However, she was not
    sure. She never saw spiders at Raymond James, and a spider bit Ms. Maaitah at her home
    a week before she reported her claim to Raymond James. Her home was fumigated for
    insects, including spiders.
    Ms. Douglas testified Terminix routinely inspected and treated Raymond James
    since 2013. Terminix had not detected a spider, alive or dead. An employee had claimed
    a spider bite before June 10, and Terminix preventatively fumigated the area.
    Ms. Maaitah filed her Petition for Benefit Determination on June 6, 2017, noting
    "the physician could not determine if the injuries and illness was due to conditions at
    work." Raymond James denied the claim on June 14 stating, "medical reveals condition
    is not work-related."
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    Standard Applied
    At this expedited hearing, Ms. Maaitah must come forward with sufficient
    evidence from which the Court can determine she likely will prove a compensable injury
    at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk.
    Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015). This lesser evidentiary standard does
    not relieve Ms. Maaitah of the burden to produce evidence of an injury by accident that
    arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment, but "allows some
    relief to be granted if that evidence does not rise to the level of a "preponderance of the
    evidence."' Buchanan v. Car/ex Glass Co., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at
    *6 (Sept. 29, 2015).
    Causation
    To prove a compensable injury, Ms. Maaitah must show her alleged injury arose
    primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-
    6-102(14)(B) (2017). An injury "arises primarily out of and in the course and scope of
    employment" only if it contributes more than fifty percent in causing the injury,
    considering all causes, as shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Tenn. Code
    Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(B) and (C).
    2
    Here, no medical proof established that a spider bit Ms. Maaitah at work, or that
    an alleged spider bite contributed more than fifty percent in causing the condition she
    claimed, considering all causes. Terminix's January through June 2016 reports showed
    that it did not detect spiders, dead or alive, at Raymond James. Additionally, Ms. Maaitah
    testified a spider bit her at home before she claimed a bite at work.
    Thus, the Court holds Ms. Maaitah failed to satisfy her burden of proving she
    sustained spider bites that arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her
    employment and denies her request for medical and temporary disability benefits.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Ms. Maaitah's claim against Raymond James for medical and temporary disability
    benefits is denied at this time.
    2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on March 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.
    Central Standard Time. The parties must call (toll-free) 866-943-0014 to
    participate in the Hearing. Failure to call may result in a determination of the
    issues without the parties' participation.
    Entered this thed-~~ day of January, 2018.
    ~~      '
    J0 DGE DEANA SEYMOUR
    >
    Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
    3
    APPENDIX
    Exhibits:
    1. Medical records with Table of Contents, filed on September 11,2017
    2. Medical records from Coast to Coast Medical dated June 13, 2016, and June 6,
    2016, not included in Exhibit 1
    3. C-32 Standard Form Medical Report for Industrial Injuries
    4. LabCorp lab results, dated June 11, 2015
    5. Lab results from The Women's Clinic, dated June 21, 2015
    6. Lab results from The Women's Clinic, dated June 21, 2015
    7. Lab results from The Women's Clinic, dated June 23, 2015
    8. Lab results from The Women's Clinic, dated July 26, 2015
    9. Authorization to Treat Occupational Injury/Illness for date of injury June 13, 2016
    10.Authorization to Treat Occupational Injury/Illness for date ofinjury May 31,2016
    11. Correspondence to Raymond James Financial from Bureau regarding filing a
    Form C-20 First Report of Injury, dated June 7, 2017
    12.Form C-23 Notice ofDenial of Claim for Compensation, dated June 14, 2017
    13. Letter to Ms. Maaitah from Bureau mediator, dated June 26, 2017
    14. Memorandum from Raymond James Financial dated June 8, 2016
    15. Raymond James Financial's response to OSHA complaint, with attachments,
    dated July 29, 2016
    16.Exterminator work orders for Ms. Maaitah's residence from Cook's Pest Control
    (Collective)
    17.Email from Ms. Maaitah to Raymond James Financial, dated June 14, 2016, and
    Raymond James Financial's response, dated June 15, 2016
    18.Email from Ms. Maaitah regarding resignation ofher employment, dated June 15,
    2016, and Raymond James Financial's response, dated June 16, 2016
    19. Affidavit of Vicki Douglas
    20.Email from Ms. Maaitah to Raymond James Financial, dated June 12,2015
    21. Unum Short Term Disability Claim forms (Collective)
    22.Email from Ms. Maaitah regarding resignation ofher employment, dated June 15,
    2016
    23. Email from Ms. Maaitah to Raymond James Financial, dated June 14, 2016
    Technical record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3. Request for Expedited Hearing and attached affidavit
    4. Response of Employer Raymond James Financial to Employee's Request for
    Expedited Hearing, along with attachments
    5. Order Denying Employee's Request for a Decision on the Record
    6. Ms. Maaitah's Witness List
    7. Ms. Maaitah's Exhibit List
    4
    8. Raymond James Financial's Pre-Hearing Brief
    9. Ms. Maaitah's Pre-Hearing Statement
    5
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Order was sent to the
    following recipients by the following methods of service on this the_    _ day of January
    29th
    2018.
    Name                Certified         Via    Via        Email Address
    Mail              Fax    Email
    Cynthia L. Maaitah,     X                       X       1976 N. Avalon Street
    Employee                                                Apartment 70
    West Memphis, AR 72301
    cmwoowoofa2vahoo.com
    Dennis G. Sadler                                 X      dem1is.sadler@leitnerfirm.com
    M. Shawn Cardwell                                       shawn.cardwell@ leitnerfinn.com
    Employer's Attorneys
    Penny atterson-Shrum, Clerk
    Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
    WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
    6
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-08-0628

Judges: Deana Seymour

Filed Date: 1/29/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2021