Henderson, Debbie v. South Central Communications , 2017 TN WC 221 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                            FILED
    December 4~ 2017
    TN COURT Of
    li\ ORKE.RS' C OMPlNSATIO
    CL.AIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT NASHVILLE
    Debbie Henderson,                                   )    Docket No. 2017-06-1090
    Employee,                                )
    v.                                                  )
    South Central Communications,                       )    State File No. 54600-2016
    Employer,                              )
    And                                                 )
    Cincinnati Ins. Co.,                                )    Judge Kenneth M. Switzer
    Carrier.                               )
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS
    This matter came before the Court on November 30, 2017, on Ms. Henderson's
    Request for Expedited Hearing. The present focus of this case is whether she is entitled
    to additional medical benefits, specifically knee and shoulder surgery, and temporary
    total disability benefits. The central legal issue is whether Ms. Henderson demonstrated
    she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits that her present need for the proposed
    treatment relates to the work accident. The Court holds Ms. Henderson satisfied her
    burden regarding causation and is therefore entitled to the proposed surgeries as well as
    temporary total disability benefits. 1
    History of Claim
    On July 19, 2016, Ms. Henderson fell at work. South Central accepted the claim,
    and she came under the care of Dr. Ronald Derr as the authorized treating physician. He
    provided conservative treatment for several months.
    As for Ms. Henderson's present request for medical benefits, on February 16,
    1
    Ms. Henderson's Affidavit states that she also seeks a penalty for wrongful termination of temporary
    disability benefits, but her counsel did not argue her entitlement to this at the hearing. Thus, the Court
    considers it waived at this time.
    1
    2017, Dr. Derr responded to a letter from the carrier as follows: 2
    The injuries she sustained to her right shoulder, left knee, left hand, and
    right foot all came from her fall that she had in July 2016. She may have
    had some pre-existing changes in her knee, but they were aggravated to the
    point of requiring surgery due to that fall. Her shoulder is not an arthritic
    issue, it is more of a soft tissue impingement tissue [sic] of the rotator cuff
    and also some arthritic changes of the AC joint. Those were also non-
    symptomatic issues until her fall in July 2016.
    I feel strongly that both of these injuries ... all came from that injury.
    (Emphasis added.) He recommended shoulder surgery and surgical evaluation of the
    knee while under anesthesia. He repeated these recommendations in his February 21 and
    June 26 notes.
    As for Ms. Henderson's request for temporary disability benefits, the parties
    agreed that she is entitled to them if the Court finds causation. Dr. Derr took her off work
    on August 10. The last off-work slip in the record, dated February 16, 2017, took Ms.
    Henderson off work for eight weeks. According to Ms. Henderson, South Central
    terminated temporary disability benefits on March 1, 2017. The Notice of Controversy
    stated, "Etiology of the current complaints not related to injury by accident[.]"
    According to the wage statement, Ms. Henderson's average weekly wage was $858.72,
    so her compensation rate is $572.48 weekly or $81.78 per day.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    The Workers' Compensation Law defines "injury" as an injury by accident arising
    primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment that causes the need for
    medical treatment. An aggravation of a pre-existing condition is a compensable injury
    when "it can be shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the aggravation
    arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment." Tenn. Code Ann. §
    50-6-102(14)(A) (2017).
    As the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board explained in Miller v. Lowe's
    Home Centers, Inc. , 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 40, at *13 (Oct. 21, 2015),
    "[A]n employee can satisfy the burden of proving a compensable aggravation if: (1) there
    is expert medical proof that the work accident "contributed more than fifty percent
    (50%)" in causing the aggravation, and (2) the work accident was the cause of the
    aggravation "more likely than not considering all causes." However, an employee need
    not prove each and every element of his or her claim by a preponderance of the evidence
    2
    Neither party introduced the carrier's letter.
    2
    at an expedited hearing to obtain temporary disability or medical benefits but "must come
    forward with sufficient evidence from which the court can conclude that he or she is
    likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits, consistent with Tennessee Code Annotated
    section 50-6-239(d)(l)." !d., citing McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN
    Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
    Here, Dr. Derr maintained in his letter to the adjuster that the need for the
    proposed treatment-shoulder and knee surgery- relates to the work accident. He
    acknowledged the presence of "some pre-existing changes in her knee, but they were
    aggravated to the point of requiring surgery due to that fall." (Emphasis added.) Dr.
    Derr further wrote that her shoulder problem "is not an arthritic issue, it is more of a soft
    tissue impingement tissue [sic] of the rotator cuff and also some arthritic changes of the
    AC joint. Those were also non-symptomatic issues until her fall in July 2016." His
    opinions relate the need for surgery for both the knee and shoulder to the work accident
    in layperson's language.
    South Central acknowledged that Dr. Derr was not required to couch his opinion
    verbatim to the statutory definition of a compensable injury under Panzarella v.
    Amazon. com, Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at* 13 (May 15, 2017):
    [A] physician may render an opinion that meets the legal standard espoused
    in section 50-6-102(14) without couching the opinion in a rigid recitation of
    the statutory definition. What is necessary, however, is sufficient proof
    from which the trial court can conclude that the statutory requirements of
    an injury as defined in section 50-6-102(14) are satisfied.
    However, South Central emphasized that Dr. Derr's records contain references to the
    preexisting nature of Ms. Henderson's need for surgery, so that Ms. Henderson failed to
    satisfy her burden on causation. The Court read these records in their entirety and
    disagrees. Rather, the overarching theme from the medical records is that Ms. Henderson
    suffered a compensable aggravation of "preexisting changes" in her knee as defined in
    the statute and further explained in Miller. The records also substantiate that Dr. Derr
    believes the need for shoulder surgery arose primarily out of and in the course and scope
    of employment. He wrote that her condition was not an "arthritic issue" but a soft-tissue
    impingement that was not symptomatic until after the fall at work. Dr. Derr felt
    "strongly" that the fall caused the need for surgery. He noted the preexisting conditions
    and ruled them out as the primary cause of the need for treatment for both the knee and
    shoulder.
    Thus, the Court finds that Ms. Henderson is likely to prevail at a hearing on the
    merits that her current need for treatment - shoulder and knee surgery - arises primarily
    out of her employment. Therefore, the Court grants her requests for additional medical
    benefits, including the proposed surgeries.
    3
    Finally, as to her request for temporary disability benefits, Ms. Henderson must
    show: (1) she became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) there is a
    causal connection between her injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of the
    period of disability. Jones v. Crencor, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7
    (Dec. 11, 2015).
    Applying these factors, no one disputes that Ms. Henderson became disabled due
    to a compensable fall at work, and the Court finds that her current need for treatment is
    causally-related to the work accident. As for the duration of disability, the February 16
    off-work slip removed Ms. Henderson from work for eight weeks, resulting in
    entitlement to temporary disability benefits totaling $4,579.68. However, since South
    Central paid her until terminating benefits on March 1, it is entitled to thirteen days'
    credit, or $1,063.14. Ms. Henderson's net temporary total disability award is $3,516.54.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. South Central or its workers' compensation carrier shall provide Ms. Henderson
    with additional medical benefits, to include the recommended shoulder and knee
    surgenes.
    2. South Central or its workers' compensation carrier shall pay past temporary total
    disability benefits to Ms. Henderson in a lump sum of$3,515.54.
    3. This matter is set for a Status Conference on February 5, 2018, at 10:15 a.m.
    Central Time. The parties must call 615-532-9552 or toll-free at 866-943-0025
    to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without
    the party's participation.
    4. Unless interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance
    with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry
    of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).
    The Insurer or Self-Insured Employer must submit confirmation of compliance
    with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no
    later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit the
    necessary confirmation within the period of compliance may result in a penalty
    assessment for non-compliance. For questions regarding compliance, please
    contact the Workers' Compensation Compliance Unit vta email
    WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.
    ENTERED December 4, 2017.
    4
    APPENDIX
    Evidence:
    1. Ms. Henderson's Declaration
    2. First Report oflnjury
    3. Wage Statement
    4. Dr. Derr's Medical records
    5. Composite Medical Records filed by the Employer
    Technical Record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3. Request for Expedited Hearing
    4. Employer Pre-Hearing Statement
    5. Employer Witness List
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to the following
    recipients by these methods of service on December 4, 2017.
    Name                 Certified   Via Fax      Via     Service Sent to:
    Mail                     Email
    Zach Wiley,                                      X    zwiley@forthegeoQle.com;
    Employee's                                            rforrest@forthegeogle.com
    attorney
    Leslie Bishop,                                   X    lbishog@lewisthomason.com;
    Employer's                                            rlee@lewisthomason.com
    Attorney
    UM, CLERK OF COURT
    Court of orkers' Compensation Claims
    WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-06-1090

Citation Numbers: 2017 TN WC 221

Judges: Kenneth M. Switzer

Filed Date: 12/4/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/9/2021