Newman, Barbara v. The Home Depot , 2018 TN WC 173 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • FILED
    Oct 23, 2018
    08:56 AM(ET)
    TENNESSEE COURT OF
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT KNOXVILLE
    BARBARA J. NEWMAN, ) Docket No. 2016-03-1003
    Employee, )
    V. )
    THE HOME DEPOT, )
    Employer, ) State File No. 19521-2016
    And )
    NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE )
    COMPANY )
    Carrier. ) Judge Lisa A. Lowe
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS
    This matter came before the Court on Ms. Newman’s Request for Expedited
    Hearing seeking a decision on the record instead of an evidentiary hearing. Home Depot
    did not file a response. The Court issued a Docketing Notice listing the documents to be
    considered and gave the parties until October 11 to file objections and/or position
    statements. Ms. Newman did not file any objections or a position statement; Home
    Depot submitted a position statement.
    The central legal issue is whether Ms. Newman is likely to prevail at a hearing on
    the merits that her congestive heart failure and pulmonary embolus arose primarily out of
    her March 10, 2016 work injury. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Newman
    did not come forward with sufficient evidence demonstrating a likelihood to prevail at a
    hearing on the merits. Accordingly, this Court concludes she is not entitled to the
    requested benefits at this time.
    History of Claim
    A review of the written materials revealed the following facts.
    ' Home Depot filed a Motion to Strike, to which Ms. Newman filed a response and the Court addressed in
    a separate order.
    Home Depot employed Ms. Newman as a part-time greeter. When clocking-out
    on March 10, 2016, Ms. Newman noticed several cords on the floor. While stepping over
    them, she slipped and fell on her left side. She went to Blount Memorial Hospital. Home
    Depot provided a panel of physicians, and Ms. Newman received authorized treatment
    from Dr. Luke Madigan for her back. On May 25, 2017, Dr. Madigan placed her at
    maximum medical improvement, assigned a zero-percent impairment rating, and released
    her to return to work without restrictions.
    Approximately four weeks after the injury, Ms. Newman experienced difficulty
    breathing and went to the University of Tennessee Medical Center. Providers there
    diagnosed her with blood clots and congestive heart failure. Ms. Newman attended
    cardiac rehabilitation approximately three times each week for two years to improve her
    heart health.
    On August 1, 2018, Ms. Newman relapsed and again had difficulty breathing. She
    returned to the UT Medical Center and remained there for eight days. Ms. Newman also
    spent ten days receiving therapy at WellPark Rehabilitation Center.
    Ms. Newman alleged that her March 10, 2016 work injury caused her heart and
    lung problems and radically changed her daily life, both physically and emotionally. She
    provided a signed letter from Dr. Amy Barnett that stated, “I have been Ms. Newman’s
    primary care provider for seven years. She had been in her normal state of health until
    April 2016, when she was diagnosed with congestive heart failure and pulmonary
    embolus.”
    Home Depot asserted that Ms. Newman failed to provide any medical proof that
    her heart and lung conditions were related to the work injury. Additionally, Home Depot
    averred that it provided Ms. Newman all the workers’ compensation benefits to which
    she is entitled.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    Ms. Newman need not prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the
    evidence in order to obtain relief. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN
    Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Instead, she must come
    forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine she is likely to
    prevail at a hearing on the merits. /d.; Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2018).
    A work-related injury “causes ... the need for medical treatment only if it has
    been shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that it contributed more than fifty
    percent (50%) in causing the .. . need for medical treatment.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-
    102(14)(C). ‘“‘Shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty’ means that, in the
    2
    opinion of the physician, it is more likely than not considering all causes, as opposed to
    speculation or possibility.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(D).
    Here, the issue is whether Ms. Newman’s work injury caused her congestive heart
    failure and pulmonary embolus. The Court notes that Ms. Newman stated in her
    affidavit, “you have my permission to obtain my medical records[.]” However, it is Ms.
    Newman’s burden to obtain medical records and/or opinions that support her position and
    supply those to the Court for consideration. She provided one medical letter from Dr.
    Barnett. However, Dr. Barnett did not address causation and failed to establish that Ms.
    Newman’s heart and lung conditions were more likely than not related to the work injury,
    considering all causes.
    Based on review of the submitted information, this Court concludes Ms. Newman
    did not come forward with sufficient evidence to establish that she is likely to prevail at a
    hearing on the merits that her heart and lung conditions were primarily caused by the
    work injury.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Ms. Newman’s claim against Home Depot for her alleged heart and lung
    conditions is denied at this time.
    2. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on January 14, 2019, at 9:30 a.m.
    Eastern Time. The parties must call (865) 594-0109 or (toll-free) (855) 383-0003
    to participate in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may
    result in a determination of the issues without your further participation.
    ENTERED on October 23, 2018.
    Wn A Logie
    LISA A. LOWE, JUDGE
    Court of Workers’ Compensation
    APPENDIX
    The Court reviewed the entire case file in reaching its decision. Specifically, the
    Court reviewed the following documents, marked as exhibits for ease of reference:
    Exhibits:
    Ls
    Pie
    Z.
    Go Sl ey Br
    Petition for Benefit Determination
    a. Employee’s Position Statement
    Dispute Certification Notice
    Request for Expedited Hearing
    a. Affidavit of Barbara Newman
    b. Correspondence from Dr. Amy L. Barnett, dated August 31, 2018
    Motion to Strike
    Employee’s Objection to Motion to Strike
    Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Strike
    Docketing Notice for on-the-Record Determination
    Employer’s Position Statement
    a. Medical Records of Dr. Luke Madigan
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was
    sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service on October 22, 2018.
    Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to:
    Mail -
    Barbara Newman, xX Barbara Newman
    Self-Represented 327 Suburban Road
    Employee Knoxville, TN 37923
    Kenny D. Veit, x kenny.veit@leitnerfirm.com
    Employer’s Attorney
    Yo oH ee wl) Pbdantt 228-1,
    PENNY(SHRUM, Court Clerk! diy
    WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2016-03-1003

Citation Numbers: 2018 TN WC 173

Judges: Lisa Lowe

Filed Date: 10/23/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2021