Muncy, Rick O. v. Premium Distrbutors, Inc. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • FILED
    May 24, 2019
    08:53 AM(CT)
    TENNESSEE COURT OF
    WORKERS' COMPENSATION
    CLAIMS
    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT KNOXVILLE
    RICK O. MUNCY, ) Docket No. 2017-03-0447
    Employee, )
    v. )
    PREMIUM DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ) State File No. 54717-2016
    Employer, )
    And )
    FFVA MUTUAL INSURANCE ) Judge Lisa A. Lowe
    COMPANY, )
    Carrier. )
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS
    Decision on the Record
    This matter came before the Court on Mr. Muncy’s Request for Expedited Hearing
    seeking a decision on the record as to temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits.
    Premium Distributors objected and asked for an in-person hearing. Based on the limited
    TPD issue and Premium Distributors’ failure to identify a need for live testimony, the
    Court overruled the objection and allowed the parties until May 14, 2019, to submit
    documentation for the Court’s consideration.
    The central legal issue is whether Mr. Muncy is likely to prevail at a hearing on
    the merits on entitlement to temporary partial disability benefits from January 8, 2019, to
    the present. For the reasons below, the Court holds he is not.
    History of Claim
    Mr. Muncy delivered ice cream for Premium Distributors. On July 14, 2016, he
    began experiencing bilateral elbow and low back pain while unloading ice cream. Mr.
    Muncy selected Dr. Gerald Russell as his authorized treating provider. Dr. Russell
    provided conservative treatment and referred Mr. Muncy to Dr. Robert Ivy for treatment
    of his elbow. Following an earlier Expedited Hearing about Mr. Muncy’s back condition,
    the Court ordered Premium Distributors to provide Mr. Muncy with a return visit to Dr.
    |
    Russell to evaluate and treat any work-related back injury.'
    Mr. Muncy returned to see Dr. Russell, who ordered a MRI, placed restrictions of
    no bending and no lifting more than twenty pounds on January 8, 2019, and referred Mr.
    Muncy to an orthopedic surgeon.
    Mr. Muncy seeks temporary partial benefits from January 8 to the present.
    Premium Distributors argued Mr. Muncy is not entitled to TPD benefits because Dr.
    Russell never related the treatment and restrictions to the work injury. It also stated that
    an award of TPD benefits is premature since an orthopedic surgeon, who can address the
    causation issue, has not evaluated Mr. Muncy.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    Mr. Muncy need not prove every element of his claim by a preponderance of the
    evidence to obtain relief. Instead, he must present sufficient evidence to prove he is
    likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing,
    2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
    As the name implies, an injured worker is entitled to TPD benefits, a category of
    vocational disability distinct from temporary total disability (TTD), when the temporary
    disability is not total. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(1)-(2). Specifically, while TTD
    refers to the employee’s condition while completely unable to work because of the injury
    until the worker recovers as far as the nature of the injury permits, “[TPD] refers to the
    time, if any, during which the injured employee is able to resume some gainful
    employment but has not reached maximum recovery.” Frye v. Vincent Printing Co.,
    2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *15-16 (Aug. 2, 2016.)
    Here, the issue is Mr. Muncy’s entitlement to TPD benefits since Dr. Russell
    placed restrictions. In the previous Expedited Hearing Order, the Court found that Mr.
    Muncy was entitled to a return appointment with Dr. Russell to determine whether his
    back symptoms related to the work injury. The Court finds that Dr. Russell initiated
    conservative treatment and referred Mr. Muncy to an orthopedic surgeon but never
    addressed whether Mr. Muncy’s current complaints were caused by the work injury.
    Without a causation opinion from Dr. Russell or the orthopedic surgeon, the Court is
    unable to find that Mr. Muncy’s restrictions and thus resultant TPD claim relate to the
    work injury.
    Therefore, the Court concludes Mr. Muncy failed to come forward with sufficient
    evidence that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on entitlement to TPD benefits.
    ' Premium Distributors appealed the decision and the Appeals Board affirmed the trial court’s decision.
    Zz
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Mr. Muncy’s claim against Premium Distributors for TPD benefits is denied at
    this time.
    2. This matter is set for a Status Conference on July 26, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern
    Time. The parties must call (toll-free) (855) 383-0003 to participate in the Status
    Conference. Failure to appear by telephone may result in a determination of the
    issues without the parties’ further participation.
    oe A Atpwe
    LISA A. LOWE, JUDGE
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    ENTERED May 24, 2019.
    APPENDIX
    Exhibits:
    Petition for Benefit Determination
    Physical Work Performance Evaluation of ErgoScience, dated July 30, 2016
    Dispute Certification Notice
    Request for Expedited Hearing
    Affidavit of Rick O. Muncy
    Mr. Muncy’s Report of Injury Form
    Medical Reports of Dr. Gerald Russell
    Employee’s Choice of Physicians, Form C-42
    Mr. Muncy’s Brief in Support of Request for Expedited Hearing
    10. Premium Distributor’s Response in Opposition
    11. Medical Questionnaire of Dr. Gerald Russell, dated June 4, 2018
    12.Premium Distributer’s Pre-Hearing Brief
    13. Expedited Hearing Order Granting Medical Benefits, issued August 27, 2018
    14. Second Request for Expedited Hearing, filed on March 25, 2019
    15.Second Affidavit of Rick Muncy
    16. Premium Distributor’s Response in Opposition to Second Request
    17.Mr. Muncy’s Supplemental Submission in Support of Request
    18. Order Overruling Objection to On-The-Record Determination
    19. Docketing Notice for On-The-Record Determination
    CHNIAARWNS
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a correct copy of the Expedited Hearing Order was sent to the
    persons below as indicated on May 24, 2019.
    Employer’s Attorney
    Name Certified | Fax | Email | Service sent to:
    Mail
    Ameesh Kherani, xX akherani@davidhdunaway.com
    Employee’s Attorney
    Tiffany B. Sherrill, x tbsherrill@mijs.com
    ?
    SUNY
    Uhm
    PENNY S&RUM, Court Clerk
    WC.CouriClerk@tn.gov
    Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
    If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the
    form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven
    business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice
    of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.
    2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
    calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
    any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
    alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
    website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
    completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
    result in dismissal of the appeal.
    3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
    from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
    the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
    it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
    parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
    the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
    Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
    Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
    concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
    a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.
    4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
    business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
    party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
    days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
    statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
    expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
    the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
    argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.
    For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
    LB-1099
    EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation
    www. tn.gov/labor-wid/weomp.shtml
    wce.courtclerk@tn.gov
    1-800-332-2667
    Docket #:
    State File #/YR:
    Employee
    Vv.
    Employer
    Notice
    Notice is given that
    [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]
    appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at
    to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals
    Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]
    Judge
    Statement of the Issues
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    Additional Information
    Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]
    L] Temporary disability benefits
    L] Medical benefits for current injury
    LC Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court
    List of Parties
    Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: LJEmployer LJEmployee
    Address:
    Party’s Phone: Email:
    Attorney's Name: BPR#:
    Attorney’s Address: Phone:
    Attorney's City, State & Zip code:
    Attorney’s Email:
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
    Employee Name: SF#: DOI:
    Appellee(s)
    Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: L]JEmployer LJEmployee
    Appellee’s Address:
    Appellee’s Phone: Email:
    Attorney’s Name: BPR#:
    Attorney’s Address: Phone:
    Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:
    Attorney’s Email:
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I,
    Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties
    and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules
    of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20
    , certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this
    [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
    220 French Landing Drive, I-B
    Nashville, TN 37243-1002
    800-332-2667
    AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY
    I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that
    because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be
    waived. The following facts support my poverty.
    1. Full Name: 2. Address:
    3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth:
    5. Names and Ages of Ail Dependents:
    Relationship:
    Relationship:
    Relationship:
    Relationship:
    6. lam employed by:
    My employer’s address is:
    My employer’s phone number is:
    7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:
    $
    8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:
    AFDC $ per month beginning
    ssl $ per month beginning
    Retirement $ per month beginning
    Disability $ per month beginning
    Unemployment $ per month beginning
    Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning
    Other $ per month beginning
    LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
    9. My expenses are:
    Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month
    Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month
    Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month
    Water $ per month Clothing $ per month
    Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month
    Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month
    Car $ per month
    Other $ per month (describe: )
    10. Assets:
    Automobile $ (FMV)
    Checking/Savings Acct. $
    House $ __ (FMV)
    Other $ Describe:
    11. My debts are:
    Amount Owed To Whom
    | hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete
    and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.
    APPELLANT
    Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this
    day of , 20
    NOTARY PUBLIC
    My Commission Expires:
    LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-03-0447

Judges: Lisa A. Lowe

Filed Date: 5/24/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2021