Dennis, Christopher v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water , 2019 TN WC 159 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS
    AT MEMPHIS
    Christopher Dennis, Docket No.: 2018-08-1446
    Employee,
    v. State File No.: 78312-2018
    Memphis Light, Gas & Water,
    Employer. Judge Deana Seymour
    EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER
    The Court convened an Expedited Hearing on September 23, 2019, to determine
    Christopher Dennis’s entitlement to additional medical and temporary disability benefits
    stemming from a work-related truck accident. MLGW denied the additional benefits,
    contending Mr. Dennis’s ongoing symptoms are not primarily related to the accident.
    Based on the medical proof, the Court agrees and holds Mr. Dennis is not likely to prevail
    at trial on his claim for additional benefits at this time. His request is denied.
    History of Claim
    Mr. Dennis worked as an operator for MLGW. He claimed injuries to his wrists,
    right shoulder, and low back from an accident in an MLGW truck on September 21,
    2018. According to Mr. Dennis, he was a restrained passenger in the truck that hit a pole.
    On impact, he braced himself with his hands against the dash and experienced pain in his
    wrists, right shoulder, and back where he had never had pain before. MLGW provided
    him with a panel from which he chose Dr. Robert Riley Jones. '
    Dr. Jones treated Mr. Dennis’s wrist and shoulder complaints with medication and
    restricted duty. He also ordered MRIs, which revealed a possible right-wrist ligament
    "Mr. Dennis chose Concentra from an initial panel but did not provide records from that treatment. He
    also visited the emergency room on his own before treating with Dr. Jones.
    tear, a ligament tear, subluxation, and incomplete fracture of the left wrist, and a partially
    torn tendon, tendinosis, and multiple bursa loose bodies in the right shoulder.”
    After reviewing the MRIs with a radiologist, Dr. Jones concluded the results “were
    all chronic changes” that “take months to develop.” He noted that they “did not meet the
    51% rule.”* Dr. Jones diagnosed right-shoulder contusions and bilateral wrist strains from
    the accident and released him on October 12 with no permanent impairment, restrictions,
    or anticipated treatment of his work injuries. He suggested that Mr. Dennis consult his
    personal physician for further care.
    Taking that advice, Mr. Dennis went to Dr. Norfleet Thompson, who reviewed the
    diagnostic studies and noted “age indeterminate” abnormal findings in both wrists and
    right shoulder. Dr. Thompson concluded, “[T]hese are likely underlying problems
    aggravated by his car wreck.” He noted “underlying early arthritis and widening of the
    scapholunate region” that “looks chronic.”
    Mr. Dennis also pursued unauthorized treatment at Champion Orthopedic and
    received diagnoses of ruptured right-wrist ligament, left-wrist fracture, and an
    “unspecified” right-rotator cuff tear or rupture. The providers did not address causation
    but noted degenerative findings.
    Mr. Dennis disagreed with Dr. Jones’s conclusion that the torn ligaments and
    fracture in his wrists were pre-existing, chronic changes unrelated to the accident. He
    took three months of medical leave and saw other doctors, but he did not obtain medical
    opinions primarily relating his ongoing pain to his work accident. He returned to MLGW,
    where he continues to work without restrictions.
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
    Mr. Dennis must provide sufficient evidence from which the Court can determine
    he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human
    Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).
    Specifically, resolution of the issue turns on whether Mr. Dennis established the accident
    caused or aggravated his degenerative condition and led to his current complaints.
    To prevail, Mr. Dennis must prove that his condition “arose primarily out of and in
    the course and scope of employment” or that he suffered an aggravation of a pre-existing
    condition that “arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment.” Tenn.
    * Mr. Dennis’ s low-back symptoms resolved, so Dr. Jones did not order a spine MRI.
    * Dr. Jones misstates the correct legal standard. As explained in the next section, it must be shown to a
    reasonable degree of medical certainty that the employment contributed “more than fifty percent” in
    causing the need for medical treatment, considering all causes. (Emphasis added.)
    Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A) (2018). An injury “arises primarily out of and in the course
    and scope of employment” only if it has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence
    that the employment contributed “more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the injury or
    his need for medical treatment of the pre-existing condition, when considering all
    causes.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(B). Medical evidence is generally required to
    establish a causal relationship, “[e]xcept in the most obvious, simple and routine cases.”
    Berdnik v. Fairfield Glad Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at
    *10-11 (May 18, 2017). The Court finds this is not an obvious, simple and routine case,
    and medical evidence is required to establish a causal relationship.
    The opinion of the authorized treating physician, selected by the employee from
    the employer’s designated panel of physicians, is presumed correct as to causation, but
    this presumption can be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence. Tenn. Code Ann. §
    50-6-102(14)(E).
    In this case, MLGW does not dispute the accident but disputes whether Mr.
    Dennis’s current need for treatment relates to the accident. MLGW relies on Dr. Jones’s
    conclusions that Mr. Dennis’s need for treatment was primarily due to non-work related
    degenerative conditions. As ATP, Dr. Jones’s opinion is presumed correct.
    The Court found Mr. Dennis sincere in his testimony and does not disregard that
    testimony. However, the Court cannot order medical benefits based on his testimony
    alone, as the Court cannot make independent medical determinations without expert
    medical proof. Thompson v. Comcast Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at
    *31 (Jan. 30, 2018). Mr. Dennis cannot rely on his own interpretation of the medical
    proof to successfully support his argument for treatment. Instead, he must present
    sufficient medical evidence indicating he is likely to prevail at trial regarding causation.
    Arciga v. AtWork Pers. Servs., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *8-9 (Feb. 2,
    2016).
    The Court finds Mr. Dennis did not present sufficient medical proof that his need
    for treatment is causally related to his work accident. Without this proof, the Court holds
    he is unlikely to prevail at trial and denies his request for treatment at this time.
    As for Mr. Dennis’s request for temporary disability benefits, he must prove (1)
    disability from working as a result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection
    between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of
    disability. Shepherd v. Haren Constr. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS
    15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Without sufficient medical proof, the Court holds Mr. Dennis
    is also unlikely to prevail at trial on his claim for temporary disability benefits.
    IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:
    1. Mr. Dennis’s requests for medical and temporary disability benefits are denied at
    this time.
    2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on November 18, 2019, at 9:30 a.m.
    Central. You must call 615-532-9550 or toll-free at 866-943-0014 to participate in
    the Hearing. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without
    your participation.
    ENTERED October 8, 2019.
    a
    &
    "hes
    a
    Judge Deana C. Seymour
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    APPENDIX
    Technical record:
    1. Petition for Benefit Determination
    2. Dispute Certification Notice
    3. Request for Expedited Hearing along with Affidavit of Christopher Dennis
    4. Medical Records Certification and Records submitted by Mr. Dennis
    5. Employer’s Exhibit List
    6. Employer’s Witness List
    7. Employer’s Medical Records Designation
    8. Pre-Compensation Hearing Statement
    Exhibits:
    1. First Report of Injury
    2. Choice of Physicians Form — Concentra
    3. Choice of Physicians Form — Dr. Jones
    4, Medical records of Dr. Jones
    5. Final Medical Report of Dr. Jones
    6. Medical Records of Champion Orthopedics
    7. Medical Records of Campbell Clinic
    8. Imaging Records — MRI Reports
    9. Desoto Imaging Specialists Records
    10. Accident Photographs
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on October 8, 2019.
    Name Certified | Via Via Service sent to:
    Mail USPS | Email
    Christopher Dennis, x x 1182 S. Willett Street
    Self-Represented Memphis, TN 38106
    Employee
    Salwa Adnan Bahhur, xX Salwa @thehuntfirm.com
    Employer’s Attorney
    /) | /
    S Gutta AM Mn
    Peniy Shrajn, Court Clerk
    Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
    WC.CourtClerk @tn.gov
    Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
    If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
    Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:
    1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal,” and file the
    form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven
    business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice
    of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.
    2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten
    calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at
    any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the
    alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s
    website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the fee. You must file the fully-
    completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will
    result in dismissal of the appeal.
    3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request
    from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If a transcript of
    the proceedings is to be filed, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript and file
    it with the court clerk within ten business days of the filing the Notice of
    Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the evidence prepared jointly by both
    parties within ten business days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal. The statement of
    the evidence must convey a complete and accurate account of the hearing. The Workers’
    Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the
    Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof
    concerning factual matters, the absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be
    a significant obstacle to meaningful appellate review.
    4. If you wish to file a position statement, you must file it with the court clerk within ten
    business days after the deadline to file a transcript or statement of the evidence. The
    party opposing the appeal may file a response with the court clerk within ten business
    days after you file your position statement. All position statements should include: (1) a
    statement summarizing the facts of the case from the evidence admitted during the
    expedited hearing; (2) a statement summarizing the disposition of the case as a result of
    the expedited hearing; (3) a statement of the issue(s) presented for review; and (4) an
    argument, citing appropriate statutes, case law, or other authority.
    For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.
    LB-1099
    EXPEDITED HEARING NOTICE OF APPEAL
    Tennessee Division of Workers’ Compensation
    www. tn.gov/labor-wid/weomp.shtml
    wce.courtclerk@tn.gov
    1-800-332-2667
    Docket #:
    State File #/YR:
    Employee
    Vv.
    Employer
    Notice
    Notice is given that
    [List name(s) of all appealing party(ies) on separate sheet if necessary]
    appeals the order(s) of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims at
    to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals
    Board. [List the date(s) the order(s) was filed in the court clerk’s office]
    Judge
    Statement of the Issues
    Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:
    Additional Information
    Type of Case [Check the most appropriate item]
    L] Temporary disability benefits
    L] Medical benefits for current injury
    LC Medical benefits under prior order issued by the Court
    List of Parties
    Appellant (Requesting Party): At Hearing: LJEmployer LJEmployee
    Address:
    Party’s Phone: Email:
    Attorney's Name: BPR#:
    Attorney’s Address: Phone:
    Attorney's City, State & Zip code:
    Attorney’s Email:
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *
    rev. 10/18 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082
    Employee Name: SF#: DOI:
    Appellee(s)
    Appellee (Opposing Party): At Hearing: L]JEmployer LJEmployee
    Appellee’s Address:
    Appellee’s Phone: Email:
    Attorney’s Name: BPR#:
    Attorney’s Address: Phone:
    Attorney’s City, State & Zip code:
    Attorney’s Email:
    * Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I,
    Expedited Hearing Notice of Appeal by First Class, United States Mail, postage prepaid, to all parties
    and/or their attorneys in this case in accordance with Rule 0800-02-22.01(2) of the Tennessee Rules
    of Board of Workers’ Compensation Appeals on this the day of , 20
    , certify that | have forwarded a true and exact copy of this
    [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]
    LB-1099 rev. 10/18 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082
    Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation
    220 French Landing Drive, I-B
    Nashville, TN 37243-1002
    800-332-2667
    AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY
    I, , having been duly sworn according to law, make oath that
    because of my poverty, | am unable to bear the costs of this appeal and request that the filing fee to appeal be
    waived. The following facts support my poverty.
    1. Full Name: 2. Address:
    3. Telephone Number: 4. Date of Birth:
    5. Names and Ages of Ail Dependents:
    Relationship:
    Relationship:
    Relationship:
    Relationship:
    6. lam employed by:
    My employer’s address is:
    My employer’s phone number is:
    7. My present monthly household income, after federal income and social security taxes are deducted, is:
    $
    8. | receive or expect to receive money from the following sources:
    AFDC $ per month beginning
    ssl $ per month beginning
    Retirement $ per month beginning
    Disability $ per month beginning
    Unemployment $ per month beginning
    Worker's Comp.$ per month beginning
    Other $ per month beginning
    LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
    9. My expenses are:
    Rent/House Payment $ permonth Medical/Dental $ per month
    Groceries $ per month Telephone $ per month
    Electricity $ per month School Supplies $ per month
    Water $ per month Clothing $ per month
    Gas $ per month Child Care $ per month
    Transportation $ per month Child Support $ per month
    Car $ per month
    Other $ per month (describe: )
    10. Assets:
    Automobile $ (FMV)
    Checking/Savings Acct. $
    House $ __ (FMV)
    Other $ Describe:
    11. My debts are:
    Amount Owed To Whom
    | hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing answers are true, correct, and complete
    and that I am financially unable to pay the costs of this appeal.
    APPELLANT
    Sworn and subscribed before me, a notary public, this
    day of , 20
    NOTARY PUBLIC
    My Commission Expires:
    LB-1108 (REV 11/15) RDA 11082
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2018-08-1446

Citation Numbers: 2019 TN WC 159

Judges: Deana C. Seymour

Filed Date: 10/8/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2021