Appraisal Review Board v. International Church of the Foursquare Gospel , 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 29 ( 1986 )


Menu:
  • 719 S.W.2d 160 (1986)

    APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD and the Taylor County Appraisal District, Petitioners,
    v.
    INTERNATIONAL CHURCH OF the FOURSQUARE GOSPEL, Respondent.

    No. C-5513.

    Supreme Court of Texas.

    October 22, 1986.

    Shelburne J. Veselka, McCreary, Veselka, Beck & Allen, Austin, for petitioners.

    C.J. Humphrey, Amarillo, for respondent.

    PER CURIAM.

    This is an appeal from an order of the Appraisal Review Board of the Taylor County Appraisal District. The trial court erroneously assumed jurisdiction and granted the relief sought by the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel. The court of appeals, with one member dissenting, dismissed Taylor County Appraisal District's appeal pursuant to Tex.R. Civ.P. 414 (now Tex.R.App.P. 74) for failure to file a brief. 711 S.W.2d 306. We hold that the court of appeals erred in dismissing the appeal rather than the cause. The record shows that International Church of the Foursquare Gospel failed to comply with § 42.21 of the Texas Tax Code (Vernon's Supp.1986) by its failure to include the Taylor County Appraisal District as a party within 45 days after receiving notice that a final order had been entered. Compliance with § 42.21 is jurisdictional and the jurisdictional error of the trial court is apparent on the face of the record. The court of appeals' decision conflicts with § 42.21 of the Texas Tax Code. See Poly-America, Inc. v. Dallas County Appraisal District, 704 S.W.2d 936 (Tex. App.—Waco 1986, no writ). See also Cox v. Johnson, 638 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Tex.1982) (stating the rule that fundamental error survives in those cases in which absence of jurisdiction is apparent on the face of the record) and Bullock v. Amoco Production Co., 608 S.W.2d 899, 901 (Tex.1980) (holding that when a statute creates a right not existing at common law and prescribes a remedy to enforce the right, compliance with the statutory requirements is jurisdictional). Therefore, we grant the application for writ of error and pursuant to Tex. *161 R.App.P. 133(b), without hearing oral argument, we reverse the judgments of the court of appeals and the trial court and dismiss the cause.

Document Info

Docket Number: C-5513

Citation Numbers: 719 S.W.2d 160, 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 29, 1986 Tex. LEXIS 585

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 10/22/1986

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024

Cited By (30)

Taufiq Ex Rel. Patrick O'Connor & Associates Inc. v. Harris ... , 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 7462 ( 1999 )

City of Pharr v. Boarder to Boarder Trucking, SVC., Inc. , 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 3511 ( 2002 )

koll-bren-fund-vi-lp-and-hartman-3100-weslayan-acquisitions-lp-v-harris ( 2008 )

Nancy Ann Scott v. Hamilton County, Hamilton ISD, City of ... ( 2014 )

Lubbock Central Appraisal District v. Silverstar Aviation, ... ( 2001 )

Lubbock Central Appraisal District v. Silverstar Aviation, ... ( 2001 )

Gregg County Appraisal District v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, ... , 907 S.W.2d 12 ( 1995 )

Dolenz v. Dallas Central Appraisal District , 259 S.W.3d 331 ( 2008 )

Texas Department of Public Safety v. Benoit , 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 2684 ( 1999 )

North Park Terrace Apts. V, Ltd. v. Tarrant Appraisal ... ( 2005 )

North Park Terrace Apts. V, Ltd. v. Tarrant Appraisal ... ( 2005 )

Lubbock Central Appraisal District v. Silverstar Aviation, ... ( 2001 )

Betty Andrews Rogers, Et Vir v. State ( 1996 )

midland-central-appraisal-district-and-midland-county-appraisal-review ( 2006 )

City of Pharr, P.S.J.A. and Hidalgo County v. Boarder to ... ( 2002 )

Matagorda County Appraisal District v. Coastal Liquids ... ( 2005 )

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2004 )

Opinion No. ( 2004 )

Midland Central Appraisal District v. Plains Marketing, L.P. , 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 8251 ( 2006 )

City of Shenandoah v. Jimmy Swaggart Evangelistic Ass'n , 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 777 ( 1990 )

View All Citing Opinions »