Desiree Chumbley v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                 NO. 12-15-00103-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    DESIREE CHUMBLEY,                              §      APPEAL FROM THE 2ND
    APPELLANT
    V.                                             §      JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    APPELLEE                                       §      CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Desiree Chumbley appeals his conviction for burglary of a habitation.       Appellant’s
    counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    , 
    18 L. Ed. 2d 493
    (1967) and Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). We affirm.
    BACKGROUND
    The State charged Appellant with burglary of a habitation, enhanced by a prior felony
    conviction. Appellant pleaded “not guilty” to the charged offense and pleaded “true” to the
    indictment’s enhancement paragraph.      The jury found Appellant guilty and assessed a
    punishment of imprisonment for sixty years.
    ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO ANDERS V. CALIFORNIA
    Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders and Gainous. Appellant’s
    counsel states that he has reviewed the record and concluded that it reflects no jurisdictional
    defects or reversible error. In compliance with Anders, Gainous, and High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978), Appellant’s brief presents a chronological procedural
    history of the case and a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no
    arguable issues for appeal.1 See 
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 745
    , 87 S. Ct. at 1400; 
    Gainous, 436 S.W.2d at 138
    ; see also Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80, 
    109 S. Ct. 346
    , 350, 
    102 L. Ed. 2d 300
    (1988). We have conducted an independent review of the record and have found no reversible
    error. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We conclude the
    appeal is wholly frivolous.
    CONCLUSION
    As required by Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), Appellant’s
    counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. See also In re Schulman, 
    252 S.W.3d 403
    , 407 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). Having concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous, we
    grant counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
    Appellant’s counsel has a duty to, within five days of the date of this opinion, send a
    copy of the opinion and judgment to Appellant and advise him of his right to file a petition for
    discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4; In re 
    Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 411
    n.35.
    Should Appellant wish to seek review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he
    must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review on his behalf or file a
    petition for discretionary review pro se. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with
    the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the
    last timely motion for rehearing that was overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2;
    68.3(a). Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Texas
    Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4. See In re 
    Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 408
    n.22.
    BRIAN HOYLE
    Justice
    Opinion delivered January 11, 2017.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (DO NOT PUBLISH)
    1
    Appellant’s counsel states that he provided Appellant with a copy of the Anders brief. Appellant was
    given time to file his own brief in this cause. The time for filing such a brief has expired and we have received no
    pro se brief.
    2
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    JANUARY 11, 2017
    NO. 12-15-00103-CR
    DESIREE CHUMBLEY,
    Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 2nd District Court
    of Cherokee County, Texa s (Tr.Ct.No. 19193)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and brief filed
    herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the
    judgment.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment
    of the court below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court
    below for observance.
    Brian Hoyle, Justice.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-15-00103-CR

Filed Date: 1/11/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2017