Darnell, Eligah Jr. ( 2014 )

/7/©/ l/L@/»Q‘?
Cou/€'T 0{ Ce,/n¢~AL F)PPEALS
P.o.fbo)c 13308
C/-)Fm)f, S"m'nol\!
HusT¢M}TE)<{/as 787/l
DATE /Z’_../_?° /j_._.____
RE. E)¢Tm mmmm/cy war
1151 TI€/HL (Dum‘ND C' L/§@?-DlUOZR’ //97&3&``/€2
/ZE: w/z~ L/o, wl
319 DQ£NELL 1 EL/GQH Tz.
(.LEIU< 5 ~ -’ - ~ '
, L:\ucLoSE/J 13 LXT:¢AO£Om/m¥ I/\I'.€Mr w,m‘ QTT/-)cH/mem‘r, lOLL-'
935
F. LE wm THE
COUI’€T.
RECE|VED |N
couRT oF cRIMlNALAPPEALs
DEC 3 0 2014
Abel Acosta, C|erk
f . /CT£HO£O¢MFII&Y bdva OF HHBEH§ COKI’U$ SEEI~O REMLL of MA~@¢)TE o~ w/€-L/o-&>co/-Q‘? ~TML comer NO,
K C``~ Q‘O/oa)£a!
M
JM{”_'“_» lN SuPPo£T, THE HPFL¢c/m'r P/Lowo£$ 95 -fp LLow§;
dime/w gm
PIZE\/¢ OcIS 1[¢ LmG
Fm FlPPLlc/\'nov\l ncaa PosT. comman wm of
H/)/$m$
Coo€ of C£'M¢~AL PKoc€Ou/€E
(/Mf) NCILEzD m Tm;'
‘FE)c/)§ 515/150 €)<
l PH,€.TE_ EL/GHH 000/gu w C~ 934 - 0/003.,2 - //97€’
- g[p _ \\
``¢,
COKPQS . LlNOEK H£``F I/. 07
‘/3&~0 0/572/(7’ coweT
'771!££/1/\'7 fouM)/,
(&- S)
THE _'jmfe REc'ommENc)ED DEN¢HL am P£OCEDUUL G@U“ND§ B”5ED O“ 7"5
CouZTS DEC|§!ON m E>< P/»IKTE ‘f'o~/a£€$ 943 §,N 3d 7¢7/ 775 677£)(.6£//»,/)/’/’./777)
w l ly
Recoeo ju /’/>oe'r
``THE memo m Tm@ cas€ eggs wm §uppo/¢T THE §~mrg T/~/Eow 96 P*”<``OVE``“'
¢51 THE STHTE B/Q¢EF To me 66€0~0 cover of QPPE¢)LS o~ D'RECT Fl/’FE”L/
666 (HTT¢)¢HMENT. fl) Morae SPEc¢f,mLLY, 'THE STME MGU€O" mfgqu wm 1<€6
R\_
Se\/€ML maza/rqu oF meHem\/g Qéels*muce. THEY mae HLL n/)e/em€§s 19st
Bemuse ‘mev mae @nsg@' 0~ u,\/§urpom'o iman ns§€r<~np~o umch 025 omar/315
_ ______``.-_____~
THE £ecow.._
"\_.
6660~0) HPPELL/w‘r§ gL/{,N,§ of ,NE{{ECTNE pjj,mmg O¢ waung MHST 65 Et_U/ECTEO
'|'HE £ecoao 15 /Lg~'r¢) 7 - / ., /
N``:"``~l-~-D\»Egg_,:jt£§ /C,'L'Hjo”‘$ off 573/9 TL-'Gy £6'6,4£01,``/6 ``7},/(:’ C/_/H é[&_~
\\ \``\
[3-§)
, » w TH'/ ``
THE// T/Jk §wr€> own /S/z/£f 7//07 w 5 1307/am
0'\/ ``D/¢Z€c?' F}FPEAL,
F£Eceo gm
774/5 cou,e'rs OWM )O/?.Eceo€m’ 0055 mar SLI/’PMT 'T/'/¢’ 57”1755
f€c@mmENOA*r/or\/ .0/€ T/'/E ‘/{;NO/A/é$ FMO 31106/)')€»/7 of THE
chu/671 555 'W~/ompjon/ v§m~Tg 7 j,w, 3d 303 ("76'%, 55 '”/D// /777)
771-45 77/#0/1/),010/\/ @W;-r /./g;@ ,7 WA§ L-'/€/’w/€’ 70 HOD»€E§.S`` [coc/N’ @f
HPPEHL§) THE //u£ff€c‘f/c/E /755/57/)/\/(5 CM/M 65(/;0/5€ THL-',€E tit/45
NU E\//QFA/¢g //w T/JE /€Ecozo pf 727/114 Coumlzgé§j §'T£AYEG>/ M/
W4/5 cowen AT 575 _, wmmwr E)mr 'n-¢E PK€§uMPT/om THAT
REAS@NM£LE m
@u&o§m ib
couN/)EL Hm£o
lie P£ESEW/-)'n @N 91
TfLmL.
w
H/°FL/ con/15 6 w€OF”
p___¢"
'THE H/’F£/mw /v)¢/§T jnpr Gy H F/€£po/\/DE/€HA/c€
TH/W
cf T/~/£ L-“u/M/¢/c€ (/)
COUA/$€L§ /cL-'f,€L-'Sm'/WY/pn/ fm 65[0w /JA/ 0675¢7/1/¢’ §7711”/04/<@
Of KE/l§oA/A/SLFNE,§S /?NO (él) Twmr ’m/; »DEM/mz' FF/cfo/€m/M/a~'
polk/7wa mg l §W,(/g/M@ yw#§/J/M@TM/ [/w d/,§,~é@€
PKo/v@£o 7551 /5 T/JE 逢/am/m.€/< 7€),<’
TUDG//\JG (/JHET/;/E£ Cow\/j€£§' 'Co/\/@c/c? 50 £/A/@g,@m/Ngo ``T/~//;
'D£W€l€ {;chTl@N/N@ 015 ‘THE /201/¢%5#)@//4¢ P£o€€§$ ``7?//)'/" 771/5
7£//)£ mmi/ar /55 fgt/50 0/\/ 05 /4/7'\//¢\/@ /0/€00¢/€50 0 £E£//)飀
/€€§ULT. M¢FM{AN@ \/ bmw 375 §,w,ad 80?%31%3 [%z~vc/cm,
``_”"``\/
me /7%?)‘
``THE /?PPL/¢;qm§ amf P£€§£W§/ ml wm P€l£/»/G 'TW"W§/ /V 5)€€@/(00@»/
m Tm;’ Ap me
,5@/€//)£ §y§r¢'/\/) 0f JZ/sv'/ci T///)T /%a/w/§€Q // 7"2/£
72/§/, ,¢7”@ H'Cfc/MTL" /€{5£/[7/ }/57 7§4/
550 70 Dg[/¢/¢’/€ OM 5/7!-/£<
low/1
{§'» §)
/35£/£ f £c'QL/¢'$n-’@
TH£ HFP£/mm 655/6 /Q 152/z O/’/»p,ergA//ry 70 Dé‘w'z@/ 77/5
/?€com w/'H/ E(//OH/M //\/ 50/°/’0£7 wf %//5 /A/g//HT/ w
H§§/)T//m€ 10% cow/554 m,,\/,,
p/£H V/:'/<’,
7,£/”£ ZOL'J£T 0,@0[/2
E\///)L-'/VT//c)/
Srl``/\'_l``f:i``.'.\`` li~’clI:l”LY 'l"() Al’l’leL/il"'l"fs`` 'l"lll\l'l``l:l ',i"l~ll{( ll l( ll l
'l``.l-l.ll{'l"Y-l"OUR'l"l~l POl'l\lrl``S Of``~ .ERT\’()R:
/ncfiecr/``vc' a:.'.';z``.‘;lan::c
Appellant makes several allegations ofinefl``ectivc assistance They are all
meritless first because they are based on unsupported factual assertions Which are outside
the record Se€ Franl475 U.S. 1031 (1§86); see also Ex parte Preston, 833 S.W.?.d '515, 519 (Tex.
-Crirn. App. 1992) (staternents and assertions contained in an appellate brief cannot be
accepted as fact).
Second, Appellant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel must be rejected
because he has failed to bring forward a record supporting his claim See Thoinpson v.
w r\l\/\'~
§gt_t§, 9 b.'W.'Jd is(Jis, 613-14 (Tex. Criin. App. 1777). Tlie record is silent as to counsel``s
l _,,_,:,_g,_\n¢ ar atrét?$i rgggrd§p§ fha ph@llayggg»_rl amirmc (_a_nd possible inact_it)nsl ``\7"ithot.li a
record showing ccunsel’s explanations for Appellant"s present accusations, Appellant has
failed to overcome the presumption that the challenged actions constituted sound trial
, grraegy and his claims must raii. see none v. state 77 s.W_.sd szs, 336