Gomez, Francisco ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                       WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    r;
    FRANCISCO GOMEZ,Applicant
    . v.          th
    DENISE COLLINS,Judge,208 District
    Court of Harris County,
    Respondent
    On the day of (September 28,2015) !·respectfully proceed to.file a Writ of
    Mandamus for the following reasons.
    My application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Article i1.07 'Was· received by the
    Court of Harris County and filed (February 13,2014) and styl~d. ,(CAUSE; No:
    9424768-D)
    The said Court failed to transmit my application for a writ of habeas corpus
    11.07 to the Court· of Criminal Appeals of Texas after the 35 day time period.
    The trial Court ·also failed to ensure compliance with statues deg~J~g with
    actions to be taken on habeas petitions by not completing all wo:i&E::&.eft1!I~£E@ I~ th-
    in spec~fied limits or by entering orders designating .unres6~(jlf:S~JlCf.~ll``[A;Pt:ALS
    resolut~on.                                                                         · ~
    1.. Mandamus. key 16 ( 1)'                                           SEP 3 0 2015
    Application for original writ of mandamus compelli~g:district,'court judge to act
    on petition for wTit of habeas corpus was rendered moot after ·judg~,COffiP.lied with
    appellate court's order requiring reasons for delay in acting ott\fF>gtJtQ'Q~£~@(eyf\ter
    application for writ of habeas corpus was received by appellate court.          '
    2. Habeas Corpus key 689
    Trial courts must ensure compliance with.statues dealing with actions to be taken
    on habeas petitions, either by completing all work required within 35-,day time
    limit orby entering ·orders designating unresolved issues for resolution.
    Vernon'sAnn.Texas C.C.P.· art. 11.07, §§1: et.seq.,2(b~d) • .
    The Legislature provided a total of thirty.;..five days in Which the State may
    respond to a petition and in which the trial court may determine whether facts
    to be resolved, and, i f there are ·such issues, to enter . an order designating
    those issues for resolution. Art.: 11.07',.§ ·2(b) and·{c). V.A.C.C.P.
    There is no authority granting' the' trial courts to extend the limits with-
    out the entery of such an order.·Ar·t. 11.07,··§ 2(q),V.A.C.C.P.
    see: McCree v. Hampton 824.sw.2d 578 {Tex.Crim,.App 1992)
    In the matter of '(CAUSE;No:9424768~D) application for writ of habeas corpus,
    the following issues need resolution.
    1. Whether applicant is. aG-tually 'innocent;
    2. Whether applicant' was' denied.a fair. trial;
    3. Whether applicant was.denied a ·effective·assistanceof counsel in trial;
    4. Whether an illegal enhancement paragraph was used;and
    5. Whether the trial court abused its discretion.
    PRAYER
    .   .
    I prg~ that the Cciurt of Criminal Appeals of Texas grant me leave
    to file this Writ of Mandamus requesting the transmission of my said
    application and reason for delay.
    Sincerely, ..A ,/>r.-0
    ~ 0Jf}1ri.J(/J_ .
    .:;;;;
    Francisco Gomez #742398
    ·:<. ':i ;:,orne
    Wynne Unit
    810 fm 2821                                                                     .· ... ;.;r qualif:)f
    Huntsville,Texas 77349                                              . .. , ' ,,i1aging.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-48,540-04

Filed Date: 9/30/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016