Mozee, Stanley Orson ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                  WR-82,467-01
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 12/14/2015 10:24:00 AM
    Accepted 12/14/2015 10:34:18 AM
    ABEL ACOSTA
    CAUSE NOS. F99-02631-R, F00-01305-R                                                  CLERK
    WRIT NOS. W99-02631-R(A) and W00-01305-FR(B)
    RECEIVED
    EXPARTE                                       §                     COURT
    IN THE DISTRICT     OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    COURT
    12/14/2015
    §                                 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK
    §
    §       203RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    STANLEY ORSON MOZEE                           §
    and                                           §
    DENNIS LEE ALLEN                              §       DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    EXPARTE                                       §
    §
    §       NO. WR-56,666-03
    §
    DENNIS LEE ALLEN                              §
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    EXPARTE                                       §
    §
    §       NO. WR-82,467-01
    §
    STANLEY ORSON MOZEE                           §
    SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF
    APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS
    TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
    NOW COMES DENNIS LEE ALLEN and STANLEY ORSON MOZEE,
    Applicants, and submit this Supplemental Information in Support of Applications for Writs
    Supplemental Information in Support of Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus - Page 1
    of Habeas Corpus and would show the following:
    I.
    This supplemental information is contained in the attached letter to counsel from the
    Dallas County :District Attorney's Office. This letter is a Brady notice of additional
    suppressed exculpatory evidence located by the Dallas County District Attorney's Office
    Conviction Integrity Unit.
    II.
    This information should be further developed in a hearing before the trial court.
    Applicants request that the Court of Criminal Appeals issue a remand order so that this
    evidence can be fully developed.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Isl Gary A. Udashen
    GARY A. UDASHEN
    Bar Card No. 20369590
    BRUCE ANTON
    Bar Card No. 01274700
    SORRELS, UDASHEN & ANTON
    2311 Cedar Springs Road
    Suite 250
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    214-468-8100
    214-468-8104 fax
    Appearing on Behalf of the
    Innocence Project of Texas
    Counsel for Dennis Lee Allen
    Supplemental Information in Support of Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus - Page 2
    Isl Nina Morrison
    NINA MORRISON
    INNOCENCE PROJECT, INC.
    40 Worth Street, Suite 70 l
    NewYork,NewYork 10013
    212-364-5340
    212-264-5341 fax
    Isl Ezekiel Tyson. Jr.
    EZEKIEL TYSON, JR.
    Bar Card No. 24034715
    THE TYSON LAW FIRM
    342 W. Montana Avenue
    Dallas, Texas 75224
    214-942-9000
    214-942-9001 fax
    Counsel for Stanley Orson Mozee
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that on the 14th day ofDecember, 2015, a true and correct copy of the
    above and foregoing Applicants' Supplemental Information in Support of Applications for
    Writs ofHabeas Corpus was hand-delivered and electronically delivered to the Dallas County
    District Attorney's Office.
    Isl Gary A. Udashen
    GARY A. UDASHEN
    Supplemental Information in Support of Applications for Writs of Habeas Corpus - Page 3
    SUSAN HAWK
    CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
    December 11, 2015
    Via Electronic Mail
    Mr. Gary Udashen
    2311 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 250
    Dallas, TX 75201
    gau@sualaw.com
    Ms. Nina Morrison
    Innocence Project, Inc
    40 Worth St., Suite 70 I
    New York, NY 10013
    nmorrison@innocenceproject.org
    Re: Stanley Mozee; W99-0263l(A) and Dennis Allen; W00-01305(B)
    Dear Gary and Nina:
    After post-conviction discovery of the DA trial file took place and after the Court of Criminal Appeals
    remanded the above-referenced cases for findings regarding the agreed Brady claim, our office
    continued its investigation into whether additional Brady information was suppressed by the State.
    During our investigation, we interviewed numerous witnesses and obtained various documents that were
    not part of the original DA trial file.
    As we have previously discussed, our investigation combined with further extensive review of the file as
    a whole has revealed additional exculpatory and impeachment evidence, all of which should have been,
    but does not appear to have been, timely disclosed by the trial prosecutor to Mozee and Allen's trial
    counsel. We have also discovered information and/or evidence that may impeach the trial prosecutor's
    testimony admitted during the recent writ hearing conducted pursuant to the Court of Criminal Appeals'
    remand order. As a result, this letter is meant to constitute a Brady Notice regarding the following
    specific information:
    1. Undisclosed impeachment evidence pertaining to various informants:
    •   Manning and Degraftenreed
    We recently provided you with portions of the probation files of Charles Manning and Alvin
    Degraftenreed. We obtained the records in response to the trial prosecutor's testimony regarding
    whether he suppressed impeachment evidence concerning these two informants. In short, the
    probation records constitute additional proof separate and apart from the trial prosecutor's hand
    written note (Defense Exhibit 17) that both informants received assistance from the State prior to
    their testimony in the Allen case. Manning's records also contain other impeachment evidence
    indicating that at the time he was providing information regarding Mozee and Allen to law-
    Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600
    Letter to Mr. Gary Udashen and Ms. Nina Morrison
    December9, 2015
    Page 2 of3
    enforcement, he was addicted to crack/cocaine, drinking heavily and suffering from bipolar
    disorder. He was also simultaneously acting as an informant in another ongoing murder
    investigation.
    It is important to note that we obtained and provided you with only portions of the probation files
    for these two informants. It is possible there may be additional exculpatory and impeachment
    evidence in the files. As such, you can and should subpoena the entire files from the probation
    department for your review.
    •    Hardeman
    We also recently provided you with transcripts of Lone! Hardeman's guilty pleas on March 30,
    2000 and November 6, 2000. The transcripts appear to indicate two important events occurred.
    First, Hardeman received assistance from the State prior to his testimony. Second, the trial
    prosecutor was actively assisting Hardeman with his criminal cases after Hardeman's testimony
    contrary to what the trial prosecutor testified to during the writ hearing in these cases.
    We have also recently discovered that in January 1999, Hardeman received assistance from the
    State in one of his earlier criminal cases prior to providing testimony for the State. More
    specifically, Hardeman was released from the Dallas County Jail at the direction of Officer
    Penrod in order to assist law-enforcement in a separate murder investigation. Our office is
    continuing to investigate Hardeman's role in the investigation and prosecution of the murder
    case. In the meantime, we are attaching relevant copies ofHardeman's DA trial file.
    2. Undisclosed Impeachment Evidence Pertaining to ID witness:
    Both the DPD investigative file and the DA trial file contain information that a witness identified Allen
    in a photo lineup as the person who attempted to use the complainant's stolen credit card shortly after the
    murder. The trial prosecutor's notes specifically indicate that the prosecutor intended to call the witness
    to testify in Mozee's first trial. On the first day of Mozee's trial, June 26, 2000, the trial prosecutor even
    documented that Judge Dean "swore the witness in." However, the witness was never called to testify in
    either trial and there is nothing recorded in the DA trial file indicating why the witness did not testify-
    nor is there any indication that the trial prosecutor disclosed to the defense why the witness was not
    called by the State.
    We recently located and interviewed the witness. According to the witness, the witness appeared in
    court and met with who he believes was the trial prosecutor. However, after being shown two photo
    lineups and after picking who he believes was the "wrong person," both times the witness was told he
    was no longer needed and was subsequently released from the courthouse. Attached to this letter are
    copies of the trial prosecutor's notes regarding this witness.
    Frank Crowley Courts Building, 133 North Riverfront Boulevard, LB-19 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 653-3600
    Letter to Mr. Gary Udashen and Ms. Nina Morrison
    December 9, 2015
    Page 3 of3
    As previously mentioned, we are continuing to investigate these cases. Should any additional
    information come to light, this notice will be promptly supplemented. In the meantime, please let me
    know if you have any questions.
    ik_CLCIA CUMMu"
    ~0<:\i $'"'13. \c:>.:~-­
    '\-~'16-tc-\::   l,A!
    (,, u   't'f' "'\
    '?r5%                      ~o\1S-i11
    ---:>;A~.5.
    ff.
    l;S
    1~
    '           '
    ll. .
    j.j,/
    .  . ' .'   -
    -_:.•.
    I
    !
    1 ·-..a
    l -1,.',
    l~
    '
    t.:
    '
    6('J.4 ~-    (fr) 17 .;i, -'{d..3 - 7'3 11
    (?..!) ~t'( - !'{8 - 4 f<>P
    (Su.-) ''(lA-"(1 '/-   '1!11
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-82,467-01

Filed Date: 12/14/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016