Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                                KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    August 8, 2017
    The Honorable Mark A. Gonzalez                               Opinion No. KP-0158
    Nueces County District Attorney
    Nueces County Courthouse                                     Re: Whether the State may obtain a waiver
    901 Leopard, Room 206                                        of a defendant's right to seek expunction of
    Corpus Christi, Texas 78401-3681                             the record of arrest for the offense for which
    it places the defendant in pretrial diversion
    (RQ-0148-KP)
    Dear Mr. Gonzalez:
    Article 55.01 of the Code of Criminal Procedure entitles a person arrested for commission
    of a misdemeanor or certain felonies to have all records and files relating to the arrest expunged
    by meeting specified requirements. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 55.01. You state that you have a
    pretrial diversion or intervention program to rehabilitate first-time offenders charged with minor,
    nonviolent crimes and thereby avoid a criminal conviction. 1 You explain that you would like to
    retain the record of a program participant's offense because, should the person reoffend, that
    information would be pertinent to whether to offer a second chance at pretrial diversion. Request
    Letter at 2. You ask whether the State may require a defendant to waive the right to expunge the
    record of the arrest for an offense in order to participate in a pretrial diversion program for that
    offense. 
    Id. at 1-2.
    Expunction is purely a matter of statutory privilege, not a constitutional or common-law
    right. In re State Bar of Tex., 
    440 S.W.3d 621
    , 624 (Tex. 2014); TC.R. v. Bell Cty. Dist. Att 'y 's
    Office, 
    305 S.W.3d 661
    , 663 (Tex.App.-Austin 2009, no pet.). One of the statutory grounds for
    granting an expunction order is a perso11's completion of a pretrial intervention program. TEX.
    CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 55.0l(a)(2)(A)(ii). However, a defendant can "waive any rights secured
    him by law." 
    Id. art. l.14(a).
    Because a person may waive "any rights secured him by law," a
    person may waive the right to seek expunction. Id.; see In re State Bar of 
    Tex., 440 S.W.3d at 626
    (recognizing that expunction rights can be waived); In re E~punction of Jones, 
    311 S.W.3d 502
    ,
    506 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2009, no pet.) (reversing expunction order because of the defendant's
    signed waiver).
    While the El Paso Court of Appeals appears to be the only court to have considered your
    specific question, several of its opinions establish that a person may waive the right to expunction
    1
    Letter from Honorable Mark A. Gonzales, Nueces Cty. Dist. Att'y, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y
    Gen. at 2 (Feb. 14, 2017), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs ("Request Letter").
    The Honorable Mark A. Gonzalez - Page 2            (KP-0158)
    as a condition of participation in a pretrial intervention program, provided the waiver is voluntarily,
    knowingly, and intelligently made. See In re Expunction of MC, 
    412 S.W.3d 48
    , 53-54 (Tex.
    App.-El Paso 2013, pet. denied) (rejecting argument that waiver of expunction rights as condition
    of pretrial diversion program is against public policy); In re Expunction of D.R.R., 
    322 S.W.3d 771
    , 773-74 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2010, no pet.) (holding that prosecutor and defendant who enter
    into pretrial diversion agreement waiving expunction rights are parties to a contract); In re
    Expunction of R.B., 
    361 S.W.3d 184
    , 187 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2012, pet. denied) (holding that a
    waiver of expunction rights "is judicially enforceable unless the waiver is not knowingly and
    intelligently made"); In re Expunction of 
    Jones, 311 S.W.3d at 505
    (holding that the trial court
    must ensure that "waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary"); In re Expunction ofArnold, 
    34 S.W.3d 583
    , 586-87 (Tex. App.-El Paso 2000, no pet.) (finding that signed agreement was
    voluntary). The role of an attorney general opinion is to assess how a court would likely rule on a
    legal question in light of prior court decisions. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. KP-0143 (2017) at 2.
    The multiple opinions directly addressing the issue compel the conclusion that article 1.14 of the
    Code of Criminal Procedure allows a person to waive the right to seek expunction of arrest records
    and files as a condition in a pretrial diversion agreement, provided the waiver is voluntarily,
    knowingly, and intelligently made.
    The Honorable Mark A. Gonzalez - Page 3         (KP-0158)
    SUMMARY
    Article 1.14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows a
    person to waive the right to seek expunction of arrest records and
    files as a condition in a pretrial diversion agreement, provided the
    waiver is voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made.
    Very truly yours,
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JEFFREY C. MATEER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    WILLIAM A. HILL
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KP-0158

Judges: Ken Paxton

Filed Date: 7/2/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/8/2017