Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 1 AUSTIN H4floluhl4 H. sat i&Maria@ ciril Diatriat Attorsry Dan88 aouaty xb11~0, Tens PUT Birr rroB yeos lattu fag ,a8 having be.0 8RbmAtt lAr tio 1 IM m 6o t Qnt in &a 1Ylrarlans~v* mhftn4y, mpL\* wulr apply with 4qtmt rep40 w the 4undatorJ 8Ot w her4 qubWi. ~8tbbkth44BPTt8 -14 .taJrmJudicial knowl4~4 tIut tb8 lkrad4rd of aim l&ablirh& by the latter act *Ii48 bow adoptad 8&l b48 4001 isto f-:ui4ral-4": that *8~4h riXbd 8ir;l4 8fi44$4rb* i8 *not oaly baneffefal but ~148884x7 io thb op4ntloa OS rallmad tralnssnd othormsaas oftmru rtfktioa~n4 ia Wndwtieg bwlnum, @v4P484nkl at4 p rforata, 8nb 884i&1 aftafro;" and that the 44148 radar4 rould bo lp p llul to OUT l148ti44 18W8. Wo agrbo rlth your 4LUs4P8 Ss the que8ttoa8 a# ld.4 . ATTORNEY GF2LX33AL OF TEXAS