Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )

explained br tha mat Uut Um qeaS,al dirtrl.& &dgo la not cleated to*serw a8 $udgoSOP the diatrloti but OJlrpto ps?orlde 8 oub8tltuts for the regular judge to at a .talluro of th, tern of aourt in a tlaular Wynn v* R. X. Xdao~on aouuty, p” Iand * cattle CO.&r Cio. App.) 150 9. W. 310) and the Lesgirla- turn did not aon8ldm t&t txmelbg ap8nmr woe&l be hourr8d by him In..trweling from the county of ~08Meaae to other aaun- tie8 in the dbtriot to bold oourt. Uhther that bo the rouoo rm. the fultmt to provide er not, houww, it i.8 a expeMa8 to point out 8Uy or b8dvrrtent~, YF88iQr V. Dundg,cO.,