Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1942 )


Menu:
  •                                      i
    OFFICE    OF ‘WE   AlTORNEY    GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    HonorableRalphBrook
    CountyAtternoy
    LubbookCounty
    Lubbook,.Ton@
    day of S'anq,A.D.
    e l88entio  a t
    a th r
    that they ha6 in the
    a 8wa of money ia
    ~aO,OOO.OO)Dollarr,
    an of oaf& Gomlrrioaora
    oar* of any rqalrr    on the
    rat of the oouaty, and the Gouatt
    Courtbriryr further aware oi the
    ewrity to lrsirrtthr go~emnmn8 in
    rable wag to proaaouta   the prerait
    war lgalnataggrm*lto nationa, 18 18 the opla-
    loa or tha court that I)W,OOO.OO 0r the runa
    8hou.u br inreatod in govmmat      boaar.
    "ITI8 l!iWOWCBL
    RESOLVEDthat aaidFl?tJ
    Dollara be lnvomted in
    Btousan&($ao,OOO.OO)
    I
    Bonorable Xalph Brook, Page 2
    Government Bonds upon approval of the Attorney
    General of the State of Texas.
    0. v. Faraue
    tounty Judge, Lubbook County,
    Texas
    0.L Horton
    Eounty    Comleeion0r,   Preoinot
    x0. 1
    Ben Eanskrr
    County Commisslonsr,     Precinot
    NO. 2
    Edaar E. Gray
    County Commieaioner, Preoinot
    x0. 3
    Kewton Stokea
    County Commissioner, Prscinot
    l?o.4’
    ‘118oonnsotlon with this rtatter,I wll.1
    state that there ~111 remain available in the
    permanent improvement funds of Lubbook County,
    Texas, a sum or approximately 415,000.00, whloh
    amount will be eufriaient to take oare of all
    neaeesarp repairs and fmprovemente upon county
    property.
    “In looking into the law relative to this
    matter, I have found rrtiole 036 of the iWised
    civil Statutes of Texas, whioh provldae as tol-
    lOWiS:
    “*The legally authorized govarnlag body or
    any county, city or town, or the trusteee of any
    eahool distrlot or eohool:Community, may Invest
    their raspeotive sinlrin$zunda for the redap-
    tlon and payment of the outstanding bond8 of suoh
    aounty, olty or town, or oommunity, in bonda of
    the Gnlted States, war savings certificates, and
    certificatea or IndebtedneaP,ieaued by the Ssore-
    tary of the Treasury of the Gnlted States, and
    Honorable Ralph Erook, Fage 3
    in bonds of Texas, or any county of thie State,
    or of any lnoorporatea oity or tom.    110 such
    bondo shall be purchased which, according to
    their terms, mature at a date sUbsequent to the
    time of mturlty of the bonds for the payment
    of nrhloh such sinking fund was areated.'
    *Under thin article the county would be
    authorized to lnveet any sinking funds that It
    might have for the redemption  and
    outstanding bond8 of the county. i?i%?"b::~
    unable to find a- cam or artiole providing
    for euoh Inveetment of the permanent lmprove-
    nent fund, however, It would seem to me that
    If the county could Inveet the sinking funda
    in Enlted States Cmvernment 301168, that thr
    county ahould also hare the authority to In-
    vest the permanent Improvement fund in Govern-
    n;entBonds BiAOe the permanent fund repreeenta
    a aurplur and Is not needed or required to re-
    tire any outstanding indebtedness and it would
    seem to me that euch Ed lnveetment would reat
    with the dI#cretloA of the ComaIaslonera  Court
    and If they, in their OpiniOA, thought that
    $SO,OOO.OO oould be diverted Into GoQerAmeAt
    Ponds and the county property atill adequately
    cared for,  that such action would be legal.
    "The County Commissioners CoUft would llke
    your opinion on this question: 'Can a part of
    the permanent inprovement Punde be legally in-
    vested in u. S. Goverment Defense BoAde?*Vq
    The Constitution preeoribee the maximum rate of
    taxes for general purpoi3eB, for roada aAd bridges, for juries,
    zid ror permanent improvements, respectively. (Section 9,
    i&iole VIII, State Constitution). :+hemonies arising from
    taxes levied and collected for eaoh of the enumerated pur-
    posea are OOAetitUtiOAAl fUAdSi 0Ad the COITJUISSIOAeraCOUrt
    has no power to transfer money from one fund to another, or
    to expend, ror one purpose , tax money raised oetenaibly ror
    another purpose. The immediate purpose of the provision is
    to limit the anount of taxes that my be raised for thsee
    several purpoees, respectively; but It is also designed to
    Honorable   Ralph Brook, Page 4
    illhibit e~oe~i~eexpenaitur48 ior any such purpose, ana
    to mpire    that any and all money8raised by taxation for
    any purpose shall be Qpplled to that partlotiar purpose
    and to no,other. x0 i6tpua power to transfer money rr0m
    ona to another of suoh oonetltutiohaL fuuds, or expend such
    runde for another pumose, la derived from the raot that the
    origidal fund coazalns more than enough to met the current
    demanda against   it. Suoh exoesa may be retained In that fund,
    end applied to auooesding   yearr to the very purpose for whloh
    Lt was raised, thereby possibly raduolng the future tax rate
    for that purpose.    Carroll Q. ~illllama,202 S. W. 504; Com-
    misslonerst Court of Henderson Go. ‘1.Burke, 252 .S. %. 94i
    Texas Jurlsprudenoe, Vol. 11, p. 609.
    It 16 stated in our 0 inion No. O-4297, Vhe au-
    thority to invest pub110 funan Pn their custody ha6 been-
    expressly oonferred upon oertain pub110 orrloera    by the Lag-
    lslature In some instanoes and by the Conetitutlon In others,
    In eaoh fnstanae where this power Is given, the charaoter
    of the seaurities In whioh such a;oneys may be invested   has
    been careiully presuribed. In every aaae where the Legls-
    lature har authorlsed lnveatment of publlo funda, It haa
    named bonds of the United State8 Government amng the se-
    ouritles in which such funds nay be fmpestad,    reoognlzlng
    the obligations of the United State8 as the safest of se-
    our1t1ss. If the power to invest your surplus funds exlst-
    ed, ve oould oonoelie of no safer  lnvestmant.‘t xe enoloae
    a copy of said opinion for your convenienoe.
    We find no provlalon of law authorlzlng the Com-
    nlcaioners* CouA to invest any portion of the permanent
    lmprovenent fund of the count:!in any seouritlee whatsoever.
    iiowever, on the other h&ml it is apparsnt. rrom the above
    mentioned oases t.hzatany and all money raised by taxation
    ror any purpose. must be applied to tnat particular purpose
    and to no other, and t:lutthe Coruvlasioners’Court hae no
    legal right or authority to ln7est any portion of the con-
    stitutional runas (which inoludes the permanent lmproveaent
    tunda) in E. C. Government Lefense Eonds or any other sa-
    curitiea except sinking funds as authorieed by AlWcle 
    536, supra
    . Therefore, we respectfully answer the above etated
    question  in the negative.
    Yours vary truly
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-4394

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1942

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017