Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                              KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    August 13, 2018
    The Honorable Roberto Serna                              Opinion No. KP-0211
    District Attorney
    293rd Judicial District                                  Re: Whether city council members also
    458 Madison Street                                       employed by an independent school district
    Eagle Pass, Texas 78852                                  may receive compensation for their service on
    the city council (RQ-0213-KP)
    Dear Mr. Serna:
    You ask whether three employees of the Eagle Pass Independent School District
    ("District") are eligible under the Texas Constitution to receive compensation for service on the
    city council. 1 Article XVI, subsection 40(b)(1) of the Texas Constitution provides:
    (b) State employees or other individuals who receive all or part of
    their compensation either directly or indirectly from funds of the
    State of Texas and who are not State officers, shall not be barred
    from serving as members of the governing bodies of school districts,
    cities, towns, or . other local governmental districts. Such State
    employees or other individuals may not receive a salary for serving
    as members of such governing bodies, except that:
    (1) a schoolteacher, retired schoolteacher, or retired school
    administrator may receive compensation for serving as a
    member of a governing body of a school district, city, town, or
    local governmental district ....
    TEX. CONST. art. XVI,§ 40(b)(l) (emphases added). This constitutional provision permits a state-
    compensated employee of a public school district to also serve as a member of the city council.
    Id.; see Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0530 (2007) at 2-3 ("Employees of public school districts
    ... receive all or part of their compensation either directly or indirectly from funds of the State of
    Texas and thus are subject to article XVI, section 40(b)." (quotation marks omitted)). The
    1
    See Letter and Attachments from Honorable Roberto Serna, Dist. Att'y, 293rd Judicial Dist., to Honorable
    Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 1-2 (Feb. 7, 2018), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-
    opinion-rqs ("Request Letter" and "Attachments") (Attachments on file with the Op. Comm.).
    The Honorable Roberto Serna - Page 2                  (KP-0211)
    provision, however, prohibits a current school district employee from receiving a salary for serving
    on the city council unless the individual is a "schoolteacher." TEX. CONST. art. XVI,§ 40(b)(l). 2
    We have found no Texas court decisions considering which school district employees
    qualify as a "schoolteacher" for purposes of this exception. In a previous opinion, this office
    concluded that "[w]hether a particular individual who receives compensation from the State ... is
    a schoolteacher for purposes of article XVI, section 40 ... depends upon whether the individual is
    employed to instruct students in a school setting ... as a result of which participants may receive
    credit toward fulfilling their curriculum requirements." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0530 (2007)
    at 5. You inquire about three public school employees who currently serve the District in the roles
    of (1) counselor; (2) assistant principal; and (3) special education coordinator. Request Letter at 2.
    Whether a particular employee qualifies as a "schoolteacher" is generally a "question of fact that
    cannot be determined in the opinion process." Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0530 (2007) at 5.
    However, we note that the job descriptions you provided for the positions of assistant principal
    and special education coordinator do not include any teaching responsibilities. See Attachments
    at 1-6. Thus, assuming that accurately reflects their employment, the constitution would prohibit
    these individuals from receiving compensation for their service on the city council. 3 See Tex.
    Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0530 (2007) at 5; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0874 (2011) at 2
    (concluding that school district's chief of police was not a schoolteacher because he had no
    teaching responsibilities).
    The job description you provided for the counselor states that a responsibility of this
    position is to "[t]each campus developmental guidance curriculum" and "[c]ollaborate with
    teachers who teach the guidance-related curriculum." Attachments at 7. Section 33.005 of the
    Education Code requires a school counselor to plan and implement a developmental guidance and
    counseling program, which includes "a guidance curriculum to help students develop their full
    educational potential." TEX. EDUC. CODE§ 33.005(1); 4 see also 
    id. § 28.002(a)(2)(E)
    (requiring
    school districts to offer an enrichment curriculum that includes career education). To implement
    the developmental guidance curriculum, section 33.006 provides that the school counselor may
    either "deliver classroom guidance activities or serve as a consultant to teachers conducting lessons
    based on the school's guidance curriculum." 
    Id. § 33.006(b)(6);
    see also TEX. EDUC. AGENCY, A
    MODEL COMPREHENSIVE, DEVELOPMENTAL GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM FOR TEXAS
    PUBLIC SCHOOLS 19 (2004) (stating that school counselors "may teach all or some of the
    [guidance] curriculum through direct instruction" or "consult with teachers who integrate the
    2
    Y ou ask about current employees. Request Letter at 2. Article XVI, subsection 40(b )( j) also permits a
    "retired schoolteacher" or "retired school administrator" to receive compensation for city council service. TEX.
    CONST. art. XVI,§ 40(b)(I).
    3
    Y ou tell us the council members "currently receive compensation of $10.00 per month, as per the City
    Charter." Request Letter at 2. We assume the funds constitute salary and not merely the reimbursement of actual
    expenses. See Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0530 (2007) at 6 (providing that a "reimbursement of expenses does not
    constitute salary" for purposes of article XVI, section 40(b)(I) (quotation marks omitted)).
    4  According to the Texas Education Agency, the purpose of the developmental guidance curriculum "is to
    help all students develop basic life skills." TEX. EDUC. AGENCY, A MODEL COMPREHENSIVE, DEVELOPMENTAL
    GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM FOR TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS 18 (2004), available al
    https://tea.texas.gov/counseling_guidebook.html. The curriculum includes instruction in areas such as developing
    self-confidence, communication skills, and responsible behavior. Id
    The Honorable Roberto Serna - Page 3         (KP-0211)
    curriculum with other curricula"). Thus, based on the information you provided, the counselor
    could qualify as a "schoolteacher" for purposes of article XVI, subsection 40(b)( 1), depending on
    whether the employee directly instructs students in required curriculum.
    The Honorable Roberto Serna - Page 4       (KP-0211)
    SUMMARY
    Article XVI, subsection 40(b)(1) of the Texas Constitution
    prohibits current school district employees, other than
    schoolteachers, from receiving a salary for service on the city
    council.
    Whether a particular employee qualifies as a schoolteacher
    is generally a question of fact outside the scope of an attorney
    general opinion. Based on the limited facts provided, a court would
    likely conclude that the assistant principal and special education
    coordinator are not schoolteachers. A court could conclude that the
    counselor is a schoolteacher depending on whether the employee
    directly instructs students in required curriculum.
    Very truly yours,
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JEFFREY C. MATEER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    ASHLEY FRANKLIN
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KP-0211

Judges: Ken Paxton

Filed Date: 7/2/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/14/2018