Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1979 )


Menu:
  •            .   .-   .
    The Attorney General of Texas
    October    16,     1979
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General
    Honorable Charles D. Travis                  Oplnion No. MW-7 0
    Executive Director
    Texas Parks & Wildlife Department            Re: Whether the state may con-
    4200 Smith School Road                       tract to operate and maintain for
    Austin, Texas 70744                          an indefinite period recreational
    facilities developed In a federally
    owned park.
    Dear Mr. Travis:
    You inform us that the Parks and Wildlife Department has negotiated a
    cost sharfng agreement with the United States for recreational development
    of federally owned property.        Under the proposed agreement, the state
    would lease the property for an indefinite period. The federal government
    requires the state to amume responsibility for operating, maintabdng, and
    replacing all recreational facilities developed on the leased premises. You
    wlvh to know whether you may unconditionally promise to pay the operation
    and maintenance costs for an indefinite period into the future.
    Parks and Wildlife has authority to rpend state funds to build facilities
    on land owned by the federal government. See V.T.C.S. Parks h Wild. Code
    SS 13.301- 13.313; Attorney General Opinion=257 0974). The expenditures
    are made from the Texas Parks Fund established pursuant to section 3 of
    article 7.06, Taxation-General, V.T.C.S., and appropriated by the legislature
    for purposes stated in that statute. _See Attorney General GplnIons H-575
    (l975); Ii-257 (1974); M-ll64 0972,.
    Article VllI, section 6 of the Texas Constitution provides that no
    appropriation may be made for a period longer than two yeara The state
    may not as a general matter contract on ths basis of anticipated revenues
    beyond the two year period. See Fort Worth Cavalry Club v. S
    S.W.2d 660 (Ten. 1935); AttoKy      General Opinions V-291 (
    09391. Article III, section 49 of the constitution prohibits the state from
    creating debts and also prevents contracting on the basis of anticipated
    revenues.
    It lo, however, possible for the state to, enter into a contract for a
    period longer than two years See enerall S. Susman, Contract
    State of Texas-Fiscal and Constitutmnal
    %mitations,              e
    p.     215
    L     -
    Honorable Charles D. Travis     -   Page TWO (IS+70)
    140 fl9651. It mav enter Into a reouirements contract, where it does not commit itself in
    advanaa
    --.-.--   ta
    -- mweha.se am
    --a
    amount
    -------
    rk
    _- the
    _..- commoditv
    -_....... ``~ or-to
    `` aumooriate
    .          anv funda See Citv
    of Big Spr&-v%ard          of Control, 
    404 S.W.2d 610
    (Tex. 1966h &&es Scribnerb G%
    v. Mans. 
    262 S.W. 722
    (Ten. 19241, Since no obligation to ps-n arises until the goods are
    deli vered, this kind of contract d&s not commit appropriated fun&I for longer ?han two
    years.    Obligations that run current with revenues are not debts within the constitution
    and thus do not violate article Ill, section 49. In addition, the state may obligate revenues
    which do not go through the appropriations procem for a period longer than two years.
    Friedman v. American Surety Co. of New York, 151 S.Wfd 570 (Ten. 194l)i Attorney
    General Opi i O-l694 0939). The state may also enter into a binding contract Involving
    the expend&z       of appropriated funds for longer than two years where payment is
    conditioned wn the availability of appropriated funds.
    S 5(h); Attorney General Opinions M-253 (1966); M-39
    the amount of the state’s obligation can be ascertained at the inception of the contract, it
    may psy the entire consideration in advance. Attorney General Opinions C-134 fl963);
    O-6246 (19441.
    If your proposed contract conforms to any one of the methods discussed above, you
    may enter into it for a period of more than two years, but you may not enter into a
    contract   that unconditionally promises to make expenditures from funds to be
    appropriated in the future.
    SUMMARY
    The Department of Parks and Wildlife may not enter into an
    unconditional contract to make expenditures from funds to be
    appropriated in the future. However, there are procedures by
    which the Department may enter into contracts with terms
    exceeding two years.
    MARK WHITE
    Attorney General of Texas
    .JOHN W. I’AINTRR, JR.
    First Assistant Attorney General
    TED L. HARTLEY
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    Prepared by Susan Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    P.   216
    Honorable Charles D. Travis   -   Page Three   (l4W-70)
    APPROVRD:
    OPINION COMMI’lTEE
    C. Robert Heath, Chairman
    David B. Brooks
    Bill Campbell
    Susan Garrison
    Rick Gllpin
    Les Kix
    William G Reid
    Bruce Youngblood
    P.   217
    

Document Info

Docket Number: MW-70

Judges: Mark White

Filed Date: 7/2/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017