Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1970 )


Menu:
  • The Honorable Martin Dies, Jr.     Opinion No. M- 600
    Secretary of State
    State Capitol Building             Re: What statutes control
    Austin, Texas                          the Secretary of State
    In his administrative
    Forfeiture of charters
    and certificatesof
    authority of corporations
    For Failure to timely pay
    Franchise taxes; and what
    statutes apply to his
    reinstatementOF such
    Dear Mr. Mes:                          charters and certificates?
    Your opinion request presents the FoIlowIng questions:
    "1. Article 12.17(2), Taxation-General,
    Vernon's Civil Statutes, Article 7.01B(l),
    Texas Business Corporation Act, and Article [1396-j
    7.01B(l), Texas Non-Profit CorporationAct all
    provide For admlnlstratlveForFelture by the
    Secretary of State For+FalIure to pay Franchise
    tax. Under which of the above statutes should
    the Secretary of State Forfeit the charter of
    domestic corporationsand Certificateof Author-
    ity of foreign corporationsfor Failure to pay
    franchise  tax in the time prescribed by law?
    2. Does the $50.00 reinstatementFiling
    Fee and the twelve month limitation In Article
    7.01E. Texas Business Corporation Act and Article
    [:396-l   7.01E, Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act
    apply to reinstatementprovisions of Article
    12.17 3(b) Taxation-General,Vernon's Civil Statutes?"
    In answer to your First question, it,ls the opinion of this
    office that the Secretary of State may Forfeit the charter or
    certlflcateof authority of a business corporationFor Failure
    to pay Franchise taxes under authority of Article 7.01B(l),
    -286%
    .     .
    Hon. Martin Dies, Jr., page 2      (M- 600)
    Texas Business CorporationAct and Article 8.16B(l) of the
    same Act, respectively,or under the authority of Article 12.17,
    Title 122A, Taxation-GenEal, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Likewise,
    the Secretary of State may forfeit the charter or certificate
    of authority of a non-profit corporation under authority of
    Article 1396-7.OlB(l),,Texas Non-Profit CorporationAct and
    Article 8.15B(l), of the same Act respectivelyz under the
    authority of Article 
    12.17, supra
    .
    These statutes were passed by the 61st LegislatureIn
    1969. The language of Articles 7.01 and 8.16, Texas Business
    Corporation Act and Articles 7.01 and 8.15, Texas Non-Profit
    Corporation Act are Identical In so far as they prescribe a
    procedure by which the Secretary of State may Forfeit charters
    and certificatesof authority of the respective corporations
    and thereafter reinstate such charters and certificateswhere
    the requirementsFor reinstatement,set out In those statutes,
    are met.
    Article 
    12.17, supra
    , as amended In 1969, Is a relnact-
    ment of the procedures theretofore given under Article 12.17 and
    provides additionalprocedures whereby charters of domestic
    corporationsand certificatesof authority of Foreign corpora-
    tlan~,admlniatratlvelyForfeited as provided by that Title, may
    be rbvlved by the Secretary of State when the requirementsFor
    reinstatementset out In the statute, are met.
    The grounds For Forfeiture under 
    12.17, supra
    , are fallure
    to pay the Franchise tax, or File Franchise tax reports. The
    grounds For forfeiture under the provisions of the Texas Business
    Corporationand Texas Non-Profit Corporation Acts, also Include
    Failure to pay the Franchise tax or File Franchise tax reports.
    Article 
    12.17, supra
    , and the other provisions of the
    Texas Business CorporationAct and Texas Non-Profit Corporation
    Act, provide different procedures For the Forfeiture and revival
    of charters and certificatesof authority by the Secretary of
    State. Articles 7.01 and 8.16, Texas Business Corporat.lon Act
    and Articles 7.01 and 8.15, Texas Non-Profit CorporationAct,
    were passed on the same day and are the last expressionof the
    Legislature. In so Far as there Is any conflict between Article
    12.17 and these later statutes In the Texas Business Corporation
    and Texas Non-Profit Corooratlon Acts. the latest exoresslon of
    the Legislaturewould co&rol. De Jei~s de ia 0, In-Fe
    154 Crlm.Rep. 326, 
    227 S.W.2d 212
    (1950).
    -2864-
    Hon. Martin Dies, Jr., page 3       (M- 600)
    We do not regard the statutes as conflicting. We observe
    at the outset Section 9, of Senate Bill No, 603, which includes
    the amendments to Articles 7.01 and 8.15, of the Texas Non-
    Profit Corporation Act, and S.B. No. 604, which Include the
    amendments to Articles 7.01 and 8.16, of the Texas Business
    Corporation Act. These two sections read as Follows:
    "Nothing In this Act shall Invalidateany
    of the procedures hereby changed by this Act which
    have been Initiated prior to the effective date of
    this Act, and under such circumstances&ing the
    Secretary of State and any other state agency affected
    Is authorized to proceed under the appropriatepro-
    cedures authorized prior to this Act or as changed
    by this Act." (The word "and!'In brackets was ln-
    eluded In Sec. 9, of the Texas Non-Profit Cotiporatlon,
    Act only.)
    In 14 Tex.Jur.2d 642, Corporations,Section 544, it Is
    said:
    "Althoughdissolutionor Forfeiture of a
    charter terminates the existence of a corporation,
    our constitutionand statutes preserve a distinction
    between Forfeiture of a charter and dissolution.
    Statutory provisions relating to Forfeitures of
    charters are found in portions of the Revised
    Statutes deemed to remain effective after enact-
    ment of the Business Corporation Act. With one
    exception, provisions relating to involuntary
    dissolutions are Found In the Business Corporation
    Act."
    Keeping In mind the above distinction In the statutes,
    dealing with different subject matter, we conclude that the
    statutes concerned are not amendatory of one another,.and they
    do not present any conflict. Under Article 
    12.17, supra
    , deal-
    ing with Franchise taxes only, the Secretary of State is required
    to determine that the corporation taxpayer has 'noassets From
    which a Franchise tax judgment could be pafd. Under the other
    cited statutes, dealing with corporationsgenerally, no such
    requirement is provided therein. Our courts will adopt a con-
    struction of the statutes which avoids any conflict wherever
    possible.
    The statutes clearly demonstrate the Intent of the Legis-
    -2865-
    .    I
    Hon. Martin Dies, Jr., page 4      (M- 600)
    lature to provide the Secretary of State with both the For-
    feiture and reinstatementprocedures set out In Article 12.17,
    and the forfeiture and reinstatementprocedures set out In the
    Texas Business Corporation Act and the Texas Non-ProfitCorpora-
    tion Act. The Secretary of State therefore may Forfeit and
    reinstate charters and certificatesof authority under either of
    the procedures provided, and the choice of remedies would be
    dictated by the Facts of each case.
    In answer to your second question, It Is the opinion of
    this office that the reinstatementFiling Fees and the twelve
    month limitation in Article 7.OlE, Texas Business Corporation
    Act, and Article 7.01E, Texas Non-Profit Corporatlon'Act,do not
    apply to relnstatementaorForfeitures under the provisions of
    Article 
    12.17, supra
    . These First two Articles are identical,
    except For the amount of the relnstatement~FlllngFee, and pro-
    vide, In part, as Follows:
    "E. Any corporationdissolved by the
    Secretary of-State under the provlslo& of
    Section B of this Article may be remd
    by the Secretary of State at any time within
    a-period of tweive months From the date of
    such dissolution, . . . ReinstatementFiling
    Fee of $50.00 L$25.Og shall accom any the
    application For reinstatement." (925.00 For
    Non-Profit Corporations.)  (Pmphasls ours.)
    This statutory language expressly limits the refnstatement
    requirementsmentioned above to corporationsdissolved by the
    Secretary of State under the provisions of Section 3 of Article
    7.01 of the Texas Business Corporation Act and Section 9 of
    Article 7.01 of the Texas Non-Profit CorporationAct.
    SUMMARY
    The Secretary of State may administratively
    Forfeit charters and certificates of authority
    of corporationsFor Failure to pay Franchise taxes
    under authority of Articles 7.01 and 8.15, Texas
    Business Corporation Act, For business corporations,
    or under Articles 7.01 and 8.16, Texas Non-Profit
    Corporations Act, For Non-Profit Corporations. The
    Secretary of State may alSo Forfeit charters and
    certificatesof authority under the authcrity of
    Article 12.17, Title 122A, Taxation-General,V.C.S.,
    -2866-
    .
    Hon. Martin Dies, Jr., page 5     (M- 6001
    where that statute Is applicable.
    The reinstatement Filing Fees and the
    twelve month llmltatlon provided For relnstat-
    lng charters Forfeited under Section B of
    Article 7.01, of the Texas Business Corporation
    Act or under Section B of Article 7.01, of the
    Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act, do not apply
    to forfeitures made under authority of Article
    
    12.17, supra
    .
    s very   truly,
    Prepared by Wardlow Lane
    Assistant Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION CCMMITTEE
    Kerns Taylor, Chairman
    Bill Allen, Acting Co4halrman
    Thomas F. Sedberry
    Robert Davis
    William J, Craig
    Ed Esquivel
    MEADE F. GRIFFIN
    Staff Legal Assistant
    ALFRED WALKER
    Executive Assistant
    NOLA WHITE
    Ffrst Assistant
    -2867..
    

Document Info

Docket Number: M-600

Judges: Crawford Martin

Filed Date: 7/2/1970

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017