Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1940 )


Menu:
  • HonorabLe C. Woodrow Laughlin .'
    County Attorney
    Jim Well@ County
    Allae, Texas
    Dear Sir:          OP~IIIOII NO:   o-2116
    Be:    (1) May the board.~oftrustees,
    of an independent a~hool~dls:-
    trlat,~hlrea searet&ry,~who
    ls.not a trustee, and.pay,hlm
    a~salmy?
    (2) May th&,kssesioiof,taxes
    for ap lndepandentachbol d&s-
    trFot~legallybs-paid more
    .than tvo (2).per oent of the
    taxes'+messed?' If m, under
    'what~alroumstanae~?
    Ue have ~oa&fully oonsldered yonr``requesd
    for:
    the opinion of thls'departmen$touching the questions
    stated above.
    In discussingyour first question, Ve shall first
    analyze the opinion ih the aase of-Board of Trusteee of
    IndependentSchool Dlstz$ct of Houston v. Dow, 63 3. W.
    1027, (writ of error denled). !
    This case Involved a s~ultlnatltuted.agalnstthe
    Board of Trustees of the IxidependentSchool District of.
    Houston (appellants)to restraln~themfrom paying a salary
    to tuo niembereof ths Board w&o ue~e~servingaa~secretarg
    and treasurer,respeatively,thereof. It was agreed that
    If suah members aould be legally pald compensationas such,
    the salary fixed was reasonable forth? services incident
    to the poaltlons.
    For the statutory background to the .dealslon,
    we uote as follows from the opinion of the court at page
    1028 :
    Honorable C. Woodrow Laughlin, Page 2   (o-2116)
    "The appellants were elected and hold their
    offices as sahool trustees In accordancewith an
    act of the legislatureapproved February 21 1900
    (Gen. maws 1st Called Sess. 26th Leg. p. 181;
    Section 1 of the act provides that seven trusteea
    shall be elected, who .lsballconstitutethe school
    board of such independentdistrict,and all of
    whom shall serve without compensation.' Section 4
    provides that: "The trustees chosen under this
    act shall meet wlthln.twentydays after their
    election, or as soon thereafteras possible; for
    the purpose of organlzlng. A majority of said
    board shall constitutea quorum to do business,
    and they shall choose a president, secretary,
    treasurer and other necessary officers and committees
    By section 6 the board Is vested with the power to
    adopt such rules, regulations,and by-laws as they
    may deem proper, and the public free schools of the
    district are placed under their control, and they
    are given the exaluslve power to manage and govern
    the schools.~By an act approved June 23, 1897 (Gen.
    Laws. Sp. Seas. p. 48 ,-amendedby the act of June
    6, 1899, (Gen. Laws 1899, p. 329), to regulate and
    limit the expendlture~of state, county, and local
    school funds, the.loaal sohool fund may be used in
    addition to the purposes enumerated for state and
    county funds; also for 'purchasingappliancesand
    supplies,for the payment of ,lnsurancepremiums,
    janitorsand other employes, for buying school sltes,
    buying, bnlldlng, and rephrlrlngand renting sehool
    houses, and for other purposes necessary in the icon-
    dn,ptof the publla schools to be determinedby the
    board of trustees.1 . . ."
    The court held that the salaries could'not be legally
    paid and we quote the following excerpts from the opinion which
    demonstratethe reasoning of the oou%?t:
    "It Is clear from the language of the law that
    the secretaryand treasurer must be members of the
    board. . . . Their duties as officers cannot be dlf-
    ferentlatedfrom their general duties as trustees, so
    as to entitle them to compensation. . . . There Is no
    speclfla provision of~law fixing salaries to the offices
    of secretaryand treasurer of a board of school trustees,
    and if the secretary and treasurer of the appellant board
    are entitled to receive salaries, authoritymust be found
    Honorable C. Woodrow Laughlin, Page~3 (O-2116) .L        ::=;...,
    In the law for the board.:to.fix:them.   Looking:!tothe
    statutes, no express autbority"ls'found,butonfthe
    contrary, there is an-express.prohlbltlon~of.:comptn-
    sation to all the members:@ the-Board,of~.truatees:
    It would be against-.%well-settled   -ru1e..of.
    .$lic policy to.allow~it..to   ,pay,monkyto~:itsOwn
    ~membersunder .theguise of:compensatlon~:for  extra-~
    official duties. w . ~Buti even if,the#dutlesof the ,,
    secretaryand treasurer should be regarded as distinct:
    from their duties as trustees,   what authority has th(;
    board for allowLing,them .salarles.out .of-the:school
    funds? Such authority must be 'foundin~the:plalnpur-
    ,poseof the law. 1stmust-be granted.. It,.cannot   be.
    lmpll.ed from general language gFvlng.t~e,trustee,s.~      ..
    exclusive power to manage and govern the..schoolfl. i,.!.
    ?'~
    The only slgnlficant~ohangd-In~t.``s~.atut?;relat~:sg.:.
    to the subject at band pertains to the chooeing:ofthe ~tifficers
    of the board; the powers~lnvestedIn the boardj,!with.-reference.
    to -theezcpendltureof school .funds,are -essentially-the
    ,~same,~$n
    the statut.estoday.. : .. '~
    The statute as~ektcted ln.1900, pertalnlngto the
    -choosingof :the of!fiaers .of the board, (shown in..tbee   quoted ex-
    cerpt from tlrr,opinion of.the court),.read: "A.~maj.orlty.of      said
    board shall.constitute,a quorum to do busLn&sa, and they..shall
    choose a preside&j. secretary, treasurer~.and.other;n~cessary       of-
    ficers and coma%~te~.s".;.:.whereasi
    ~the~atatutenow read,st !':.    . .
    They shall.c.boose,--fromtheir .humber~a~.president;and'they shall
    choose:a~eecretary~.a,~treasurer, asseas~or-and.colisc``;or!o~    taxes,
    and'otlrlinedessa~'offi~erskirdabmmittees"..(Aat?;;i905,.29th
    Legislatiire;,‘-oh.'124.,:
    par..165, .p.~306;:``~til``.27``~Revl~ed
    _~_ ,_. ._.    ~..
    Civil Statutes).
    Xt will be obserked that the &atu&aaiiti formerly.read,
    and 8~sbefore the eourt.ln the-,case~under~discusslon,required,the
    officers of %he board,,lncludlng+he secretary to be .members.-there-
    of;.,whereas;the.statute as it now reads, while requiring,the~,:
    president to-bea member of the board,-does not spealfioallgrequire
    the secretary,and other,.offFcers named,``tobe a member. .The
    adoption of the new terml.nology~wouldseem.to establish a clear
    legislativeIntent not ,to..thereafterrequire the secretary,and
    the other ,oPflcersnamed.,to be members of the board ~of trustees:
    Mating from ~thlsproposition;namely, that k.he.sta&te
    does not now requFre.the secretary of the board to be a member
    thereofi~wefurther analyze the cited case under discussion to
    ascertain If.this .caseis',-nottithstandlng~.the
    statutory~change,
    still determinativeof the questionbefore us.
    Honorable C. Woodrow Laughlin, Page 4   (O-2116)
    The opinion, as shown by the quoted excerpts, was ground-
    ed primarily on the propositionthatthe secretary was a member of
    the board, his duties in fllling such offke of secretary could not
    be differentiatedfrom his general duties as a trustee, and it
    would thereforebs opposed to public policy to allow payment of
    money to a member of the board under the guise of compensationfor
    extra-officialduties; seaondarily,on the propositionthat, none
    the less, no authority for paying such salary Is found In the stat-
    utes.
    A thoughtful study of the case compels the oonclasion
    that the controllingpropositionIn the mind of the court; from
    which,the oplnlon cannot be divqrced, was that to Lmply``the'  power
    of the board to compensate its member-secretary(dr treaiwi-or)
    would be violative of the express statutory prohibitionagainst a
    membersof the board receiving oompensation,as well as contraryto
    public policy. The case is not, in our opinion, authority for the
    proposltlon,when the statutorybasis of this propositionhas been
    removed, that the authority of the board to compensateits non-
    member secretarymay snotreasonably be implied from the--grant    of
    power In Article 2827, Revised Civil Statutes, which reads, in part:
    11
    . . . Loos1 schooi funds from district taxes,
    tuition fees of pupils not entitled to free tuition.
    and other local sources.may be used for.the purposes
    enumeratedfor state and county funds and for puraka&=.
    lng appliancesand supplies, for the payment of Insnr-
    ante premllums,janitors and other eaployees, for buy-
    ing school sites, buying, building and repairing and
    renting school houses, and.for other purposes nedessary
    in the conduct of the public schools to be determihed
    y the board of trustees.~. . ." (Emphasis ours)
    It is observed that the court did not discuss the broad
    grant of power appearing In Article 
    2827,~ supra
    , underscoredabove.
    Moreover, we are constrainedto the opinion that this department
    cannot rule, categorically,under the language of this statute,
    that under no state of facts would .theemployment of a non-member
    secretaryby the board of trustees  of an independentschool district
    be legally allowable under this broad grant of power. Rather, lt~
    is our opinion that facts may exist rendering it reasonable,proper
    and necessary, in the conduct of the sbhools, for the board of
    trustees to choose a non-member secretary;and provide oompenaation
    for such offlaer In a sum oommensuratewith the duties incident
    thereto. We partioularlyemphaslee, however, that, In our opinion,
    the courts of Texas would carefullg,protectthe people from an
    abuse of this implied power of the board, and would sanction no
    such expenditure of school funds except upon a clear showing of the
    reasonablenessand neoesslty therefor.
    Honorable C. Woodrow Laughlin, Page 5   (0-2116)
    Your second question, we believe, is,resolvedby Article
    2791, Revised Civil Statutes,  which reads, In part, as follows:
    II
    . . . It shall be wlthin the discretlon.ofthe
    board of trustees  of any Independentschool district
    to name an assessor of taxes who shall assess the
    taxable property wlthin the limits of the Independent
    school district within the time and in the manner pro-
    vided by existing laws, In so far as they are appllca-
    ble, . . . the said assessor of taxes shall receive a
    fee or two per cent of the whole amount of taxes assessed
    by him and as shown by the completed certifiedtax rolls."
    We know of no statute that would allow an assessor of
    taxes of an Independentschool district, as distinguishedfrom
    the district assessor and collector of taxes, to receive a fee In
    excess of two per cent of the whole amount of taxes assessed by
    him, as provided In the foregoing statute. Your second question
    is therefore respectfullyanswered In the negative.
    Trusting that we have satisfactorilyanswered yourin-
    quiry, we remain,
    Yours very truly,
    ATTORREYCERERALOFTEXAS
    By   /s/ Zollle C. Steakley
    Zollle C. Steakley
    ACS:IX:mjs                                     Assistant
    APPROVED APR 17; 1940
    APPROVED OPIEIOR COMMITTEE
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-2116

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1940

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017