Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  • Honorable A. E. Hickerson
    County Attorney
    Montgomery Cm&y
    Conroe, Texas
    Dear Mr. Hickerson:                      Opinion No. O-1707
    Re: Selection and Desiguation of
    Depository for San Jacinto
    River Conservation end Reclam-
    tion District.
    We acknowledge receipt of your communication dated November I:;,1939,
    in which you request the opinion of this department on the following questions
    which we quote from your letter:
    (1) "Should the authorities ofthe San Jacinto River Con-
    servation and Reclamation District be required to select a de-
    pository for funds, or should they use the same depository a8
    the county and county txhoole."
    (2) ",I8the Comnieeioners' Court in any way'responsible
    for the selection of this depository."
    In considering the above questions we have carefully read and studied
    House Bill No. 832, passed by the Forty-fifth Legislature in ~1937,creating
    the San Jacinto River Conservation and Reclamation District under authority
    of Section 59 of Article ~6 of the Constitution of the State of Texas and de-
    fining the powers and duties of the said district. We have also read and studied
    House Bill No. 941 and House Bill No. 1079, passed by the Forty-sixth Legisla-
    ture in 1939, the same being amendments to House Bill No. 832.
    Neither of the above mentioned acts of the Legislature specifically
    authorize or require the San Jacinto River Conservation and Recl+uation Dis-
    trict to select and designate a depository for it8 funds. It will be noted,
    however, that Section 6 of House Bill No. 832, Regular Session, Forty-fifth,
    Legislature, after providing for the appointmentof a teniporaryboard of di-
    rectors and the election of officers, requires that:
    "Each of esid temporary directors shall take and subscribe
    to an oath of office, similar to the oath required of County
    Commissioners, and shall execute bond in the sun of Five Thou-
    sand Dollars ($5,000.00) payable to the District, the suffi-
    ciency of which bonds shall be determined by the State Board of
    -
    Honorable A. E. Bicker-son,Page 2 (O-1707)
    Water Engineers, which bond after being recorded in the offi-
    cialbond records of the county in which the district maintains
    its office shall be deposited with the depository selected and
    approved for the deposit of the fund.6of the District."
    (Emphasis added.)
    It IS manifest, we think, from the above that the legislative act
    creating the San Jacinto River Conservation and Reclamation District and de-
    fining its powers and duties contemplated that a depository should be selected
    and designated for the deposit of the funds of the District and the official
    bonds of its directors. This, no doubt, would be true even in the absence
    of the above quoted provision a6 it has always been the policy of the Legis-
    lature to require each political subdivision of the State handling public funds
    to select and designate a depository for the deposit and safe keeping of its
    funds, and to require the depository selected to give a good and sufficient
    bond as security. State Bank of Commerce vs. United States Fidelity & Guaranty
    Company, 28 S.W. (2d) 184, from which we quote a6 follows:
    "A   sound public policy requires that the State should take
    special   security from every one who collects or handles public
    funas.    That rule seems to began old one in this State, and IS
    applied   in all cases without exception."
    Section 2 of House Bill No. 
    832, supra
    , reads as follows:
    "The San Jacinto River Conservation and Reclamation Dis-
    trict is created as a governmental agency, a body politic and
    corporate, vested with all the authority as such under the
    Constitution and laws of the State; and shall have and be rec-
    ognized to exercise all of the powers of such governmental
    agency and body politic and corporate as expressly authorized
    in the provisions of the Constitution, Section 59 of Article
    XVI, for Districts created to conserve, control, and utilize
    to beneficial service the storm and flood waters of rivers
    and streams of the State, or such powers a6 may be contempla-
    ted and imnlied by the uurooses of this provision of the Con-
    stitution,-and as-may be conferred by General Law, and in the
    provisions of this Act; and shall have and be recoepized to
    exercise all the rights and powers of an independent govern-
    mental agency, body politic and corporate, to formulate any
    and all clans deemed essential to the operation of the Dis-
    trict anh for its administration in the control, storing;
    preservation, and distribution to all useful purposes of the
    storm and flood waters of the San Jacinto River and its tribu-
    tary streams; and a6 such District, shall have and be recog-
    nized to exercise such authority and power of control and
    regulation over such storm and flood waters of the San Jacinto
    River and its tributaries as may be exercised by the State of
    Texas, subject to the provisions of the Constitution and the
    Acts of the Legislature." (Emphasis added.)
    Hocrrable A. E. Hickerson, Page 3 (O-1707)
    It will be noted that Section 6 of said House Bill No. 832 provides
    that the San Jacinto River Conservation and Reclamation District shall have
    "all and singular, the powers, duties, functions, and to observe procedures
    insofar as the same may be applicable and practicable, to accomplish the pur-
    poses of this Act, as is provided by Chapter 25 of the General Laws of the
    Thirty-ninth Legislature, Regular Session, and the several amendments thereof."
    It appears, therefore, that the San Jacinto River Conservation and
    Reclamation District has, in addition to the powers set out in House Bill No.
    832, and its 
    amendments, supra
    , all of the powers set out in Chapter 25 of
    the General Laws of the Thirty-ninth Legislature, Regular Session (Article
    7880), and should follow the procedure therein set out insofar as the same
    may be applicable and not in conflict with the specific terms and provisions
    of said House Bill NO. 832, and its amendments.
    Chapter 25 of the General Laws of the Thirty-ninth Legislature, Regu-
    lar Session, carried in Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes as Article 7880,
    is a very comprehensive statute, containing in excess of one hundred and fifty
    sections, dealing with water control and improvement districts, in general.
    Section 113 of Article 7860 provides that a depository shall be selected for
    such districts by the directors thereof, "in accordance with the provisions
    of law for the selection of depositories for counties in this State, and the
    duties of such depo$itory and the bond and securities to be given thereby shall
    be the same as provided by law for county depositories, except as herein other-
    wise expressly provided." This Article further requires the depository so
    selected to furnish a good and sufficient bond to fully protect the district
    and guarantee the safe keeping of its funds and directs how the funds shall
    be kept and paid out.
    From the above we have concluded that the San Jacinto River Conserva-
    tion and Reclamation District should select and designate a depository for the
    safe-keeping of its funds and official bonds, a+ should not rely on the county
    depository for this purpose. If this is not done, the funds of the Conserva-
    tion and Reclamation District will be unprotected, as the county and school
    depository bond only protects those funds belonging to and dsposited in the
    depository by the respective political subdivisions. Hale County, Texas, et al.
    vs. American Indemnity Company, et al., 63 Fed. (2d) 275.
    Inasmuch as the legislative act creating the San Jacinto River Con-
    servation and Reclamation District gives to the district all and singular the
    powers, duties and functions set out in Chapter 25 of the General Laws of the
    Thirty-ninth Legislature, Regular Session, and the several amendments thereto
    (Article 7860, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas), and charges said district
    with the duty of observing the procedure provided for in said Act, insofar
    as the same may be applicable and practicable, it is our opinion that it would
    be proper for, and the said Conservation and Reclamation District should fol-
    low the procedure set out in Chapter 25 of the General Laws of the Thirty-Ninth
    Legislature, Regular Session, for the selection of a district depository.
    I   .   .
    Honorable A. E. Hickerson, Page 4 (O-1707)
    In answer to your first question, it is the opinion of this depart-
    ment that the directors of the San Jacinto River Conservation and Reclamation
    District should select and designate a depository for its funds and in so do-
    ing should follow the procedure provided for in Article 7880, Section 113,
    Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, the same being a part of Chapter 25, General
    Laws, Thirty-ninth Legislature, Regular Session.
    In answer to your second question, it is the opinion of this depart-
    ment that the Commissioners' Court is in no way responsible for the selection
    of the depository for the Conservation and Reclamation District. The duty
    of selecting the depository rests solely on the directors of the district.
    Yours very truly
    APPROVED DEC 9, 1939                             A!iTOREEIGENERALOFTEXAS
    /s/ Gerald c. Msnn
    ATTORNEY GF.NERALOF TEXAS                        By    /s/ Tom D. Rowell, Jr.
    Tom D. Rowell, Jr.
    Assistant
    TDR:FG:Ul
    APPROVED
    OPINION
    col.Qmrl!EE
    BY /s/ BWB
    CHAIRMAN
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1707

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017