Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  • OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AVSTlN -c.mlm -- rrity of loernine;r 8%quotapros thnt oplnsonr lrpplylng the &rina2p1eshero allnomo%d to tho foots of the inet8ut oasa, it my be said that the uzdrctrtitycor~ou had the vsr to mnke, either SOP ittmlf or See the henex t or ang or its WrralatQd or omillsuy eutlools, a oontnrat mtas~nablfu%WsstbryPot'the pz'omotion of+its bus& nQo1 or tJlafulfillmentQP the plrpaws ror WI&h 3.t ms inoorporntod,prw#& slushcontrwt WM not in Ylantion OP th% l&w or xiphlst &xmlo pal- -Y* Sbee the aourtfound that &oqital faaili- wosuar%newssopy to g;ivetbe staaont5 oft&? %6dicnl Sal%01 &ii%olial%al -%tloll F%quir%ii, ue.aro of the optnion that It was ulthin tXm COP- ~palratci pouers of t?m urtir0reit.y wxqot.=ntionto tunkoth5 oontraet SOP tbs reut of a Bullding in ~hlsh tha hospitaltsightbe established. %or do 88 thillk tdlltt th0 fisct thtlt th% StUdWtS Of th6 Akeaonl school had the pri*oge aad 0pIswttmlty of ritdidng other hospzltnxo 5x1the tdty, in eon- nootiotlwith their course in a1lxdas,a%mld dotor- Eptpbth5 matter ot the r%sson%ble naoeesity at pm- yitUng hoepltal facilitbttmartsd&%%tly ux+d%~the wzttrolofm3sdmrs ef tb% iaMity oftbeX&.l%al SWmolsuchas fshae sbolninth%%as%ioe the hespGa.l eonbactedby tb%EospstalAss%%i~t~on. Bw.lt tdght bo said ultb aore form io the mw%s 0f,%0rstY. Lwls and riiltarf3emf. mm CO.) su~,t~tftaasnot~sonablya~s%sry for t&sJU%u~Conaaoyto b%%on;e%?m%tyforthopay- m3nt of tha rant of am3of its oust4mWs,'%r on% uho aould tim'oby bscors. ntlo or its %ustim%re, as it could finl customersfor its -&,a sithout ascMninp,such svroty. %ut the test hare, OS tber%, is whet&r ths aot doue was in the masona?ale and &wSul pramtim of tha gmp%aos and 0bfDcte ?or uh%ab the aorpwntian uas orwtott~ The POW tms %uiverwPty' lztplie5an 1ustitutionof asrgrddpnrt- aaant5,anl tbebuildlng:upirp on%dqmrtmolltof th% sohoor oc the scrturinlr of students POP oue da- partmant would aatumlly ppsir%wmably~t%nd to Tta ul% vulfmw and glwim of otIx?rdqSFt.- netlteaud or the ins&itut2on as a malo." AppQd.rq WS rula 0f? Iaw tQ tha ~oOnS``Ctitm Of seu. 2(a) R!nklngal% spprogdat~cm, it.is the opzl.nlon af this dapwtmat that pour iquiri%& should ba %nmmvd a%t%goriocl- ly as FoUow3t Bon. Tomc. a - Fag%6 1. ofltttln~ %Btmw~lz~te afihl* 8atititles 1m the eeops of the plwposes of slloh l.n8titutionm. Meed, such tmtirities appear tobe ate not only for the physicnl depelo~t ctf stu&mts wea3 to have sspeols1 h%l~ms in the titwrtislng ud, tharefora* the &%%laral t3tt0#88 of- the institutions tham- wlY63. to2&o,t x0. nmre lm no *st relcrfion between the In- -8 travel* stutl0nts in calmootion vftb the ~tiyei%e of the institut10n that voulaJnstay the paymx?nt of+preardPmstherefor~ Suahio -% ie not ressonitbly mes- snry nor&3r%talmcitl5w%nproperastul-tlttoth% tl!a%t$enenoeof the institution. The pr&eiolis reTerr& to In that3 qu0stlon XW. The college mplr%t.- the esprit de corps - et? the s&&t impro+sct.By th% eolle@ ban&. body is atdtititteiily Inarery just stmse thebatdthus oontrihntesto the su006ss of the institution. Thereis not the neGossory incid%ntal nited, ami proxl&e ]o%iribtation, tbat would make %otor bonts to be use& for al0 ente- t of stw%mts aml. CsnprayeSs of the college a proper item of experts0 for the support, meintenaeao, spew&Ion at&i imprwetnent of the instifuficr. zf a motor boat,uhy not an~4xLvpUme or a~ysobtt 7.. x0. Thtoilaty of pm~li&ts ana otbec usixa and ordinary safqgaards,such 8s those at street Snter- emotions, belong5 to the dty 0tk-l the placing of srrch lights is wt a reasonable SnoicIent $0 the mar&x? OP the Ssstitu- tion53.tpom3rs of the cf3llega. mssiblg a spcolalt~c Eon. Tom c* ang - Page 6 251

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1661

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017