Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                       1.65
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF              TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    $onorable I... A. Woedo
    state Superintendent   of Pub110 Pnetruotlon
    AUdiin, Texas
    pear sir:
    Your request for an 0
    a# umd in Artiola    295, Penal C
    thl8 Pepartment.
    Artlole   e95, Psilil   C
    pon any pub110
    oh eohool after
    BUChsabocl to
    loam suoh gro                                    leas than rive nor
    more than trrvn
    drfinitiena   am tOere giv;n,     the firat
    term as used in ltrr “broad aen@'         or in
    atlnp6 that the word ie so!#t~r          tied ~to
    lXtCdml
    nade t
    A.66
    200. L. A. Woode, Page 2
    In the ease of Shaw V. Carter, 28'7Pac. 2T3, the Oklahoma
    supreme Court, In dlscuss~        the meenln~ of the word “semvlon,”
    &mrly    reoognlzes   that the word can be end la used in both a broad
    end restrict&d    sense.  The court sets out the result of an extended
    study on the subjeat and makes exhaulrtfve comments on both meanings.
    ubila the oooaslon Sor deilnlng the word has never arisen under
    Artlole 295, Penal Code, the Courts OS Texas have reoognlxed the
    faot that the word does have two 616tlnot meanings and have further
    recognized a clear-out    dlstlnotlon  between the meaning OS the word
    *sesalon” and that OS the word *term.*       606 Robertclonf. state,
    70 2, 3. 542; Llparl Y. state, 19 Tex. hppe. 431; 3merson v. P.K.T.
    W., 82 S. 6'.1060.
    Xebster’s    Internettonal   Dictionary     elves   the SolIoulng
    general   derlnitlon:
    “The actual or construotlvs    sitting  OS e oourt,
    ooum3e1, leg1sIature,   eto.,   or the actual or aormtruo-
    tlve aseembly OS the members of suah a body, for the
    traneaotlon  OS business.    . . v
    The 8am authority        glres the following deilt&tlor,          atv relat-
    lng to sduoatlon:
    “A period OS the year during whloh au eduoatloual
    institution    oonduate olasees or gl~'eelnstruotlone.r
    The intention   aS the Leglelature      in enacting   this   etatute
    becomes clear when all the a’ttendant olroumstanoea are taken into
    oonslderatlon. The buildings and property OS mhoole are proteoted
    by  other general lawe rehtlug     to trespass,   burglary and theit.
    The evident  purpose OS ths statute under oonslderatlon         la the pro-
    teotlon of children and the preaervatlon       OS order and deoontm through-
    out that period OS the day during which sohool 18 open and In 6eW3ion.
    The authority OS teachers In charge is clearly        reboplzed    and auS-
    talned. Had the Legislature intended the statute to operate at
    +ny other time, no apparent reason exlets Sol’.llmltlng         its applloa-
    tlon to any particular  period OS the year;       Turthermore, ii the Legle-
    lature rceant to reier to the entire sohool year, the word utennw would.
    have been appropriate  and speoiiio.
    It la themfore  the opinion OS this Department thist the
    term Wm5ssion,n aa used in Artlole  295~, Penal Code, refers to that
    period OS the day during which a sohool lo open, alasses are eon-
    duoted and other business and sohool matters are oonsldsred.    In other
    soa.     L.   AI   YiOods, Page   :3
    w&s,   the seselon of a eohool oomlwnoes at the time the door8 are
    opened In the morning and oloses at the time the pereon in ohargo
    look6 the doors In the afternoon or evening,
    Your8   very   truly
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1642

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017