-
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN a* c MANN All---- Honorable V. 0. ?darehall., Ohairman sttte Soil ConservetlonEOt%4 ProfestionslBulldIne Temple, Texas Dear Sirr This will no pt of pour letter of Oatobfc 19, requeet on rr05 this depart- o? 'PornpIe is the preolno8 ot l%ndownen tot0 who lirs eide the eorperste l5mlt# within this prsalnat OS the pririlqp of rotin~. @The purpose of the S.&uaa ie written, an4 the prooielons under whish it mwt be earrisd out, seems to be such ~6 plsaea the Beard ohrged Hon. V. C. Marehall, Pace 2 with the responsIbIlItyof aarrplne the law ;;t, In an llnpoaalblaposition. Our question : Is it possible for the State Board to proaaed with electiona ior the oreatlon of Sol1 ConservationDistricts an4 meet the re- quirements OS the law as wrltten'lv COnstruing your questionwhioh Is In Itself verF broad, along with the iaota furnished an4 the Attorney hen- eral'e Opinions Numbers O-906, 0-lEO4, O-1383 an4 O-1496, us 4eduoe that ou want to know whether an elaation ha14 aa provided In ieotioh 5, subdIvIsIonsc, D an4 R of ths Stats 9011 ConaaroationAot, Ii.B. No. 20, 46th Legislature, will be legal IT the "voting boxv or vpol1I.u~plaae" (where the votes are oaat) Is looatad within tha corporatelimits of a oity; that Is, where the preolnot Itsalf embraoea territory Iu the oity Unit6 an4 territory outside the olty 1Imlts. Frequently,ths term Voting box* arid"voting preainat~ are used loosely as having the same meaning. i7e aeorlbe to them CIff.%rent meanings. Voting praolnot" has reference to an area defined as suah by the oounty oom- misslonera~ oourt. Artfoles 2933, 2934, an4 E935, R. C. S. of Texas, 1925. Voting box" has refersnoe to the plaoe or looatlon where the alsotlon Itself is held, tha WpollIng plaoew. Artloles 2931 an4 2932, R. C. S. of Texas. Iu our latter and example, you reter to the *Tecupla west it ountry boxW ae being a plaoe within tha aor- porate limIts~,oiTemple whera people vote. It Is assume4 that you we the word Voting box* In the sam mm80 as we. Or4lnerIly,suoh an arraneemantwould present no problem, so long aa tha loaatlon OZ ths "voting bat* was within the boundaries of the praolnot. Rowever, It would present a problem In sums oa8eY as in municipal electionswhloh has been taken oars oi by statuts. ArtioleS 2931, 2934 an4 2951, R. C. S. of Texas 1925. No such OX- press provIsIons have bean made for the elaotions IuquIrs4 about by you. The pertinent provision8 of tha S0f.lWn- servation
Aat, supra, hereafter referred to as the Aot, are as tolloW0: "C. . . To assist the Boar4 In tha de- tarmInatIonof auoh a4miuIetretivepraatiaa- bIlIty an4 fsaeIbIlItp,It ahall'be tha 4ut of tha Board, within a reasonable time ai& en$ry of the findine that there is usa4 far Hon. V. C. Earshall, Pace 3 the or~anlxatIonOS the proposed dlstrlot and the determinationof the boundsrise thereof, to hold an eleatlon within the propose4 4Istriot UPon the ProPosltlon of the creationor the dlstrlot, and to OQU8e due not100 OS suoh eleatlo:~to be Riven, whloh notioe shall set forth the boundaries of the proposed 4IstrIot. . . ." "D. The Eoaf4 shall pay all expenses Sor the issuanoe OS suoh notioes a~& the conduot OS suoh hearlugs an4 eleotlons,and shall supervisa the oonduot OS suoh hearlnps and elaotious.lt h 11 I mropriate regulationsgovemlIng- :h: oonde::;:I'suoh hearlnus and eleatione, and provldlnfifor the regletratlonprior to the date OS the cieatlon OS all eligible voters. All such elcctlons held uuder the provisionaOS this Act shall be In oonformltp with the General Leo- tion Laws of thle state, except as herein otherwise provided, an4 sroept that the ballot shall not be numbered or marke4 Sor I4entIfIoatIonpurposes. *E. The Boar4 shall publish the result of such eleatIon an4 shall thrreafteroonslder ah& determine whether the operation of the dlstrlot within the defined boundaries Is e4mInIstratIvely praotloablean4 feasible . . .v (Underaoorlng ours) Elections he14 under the State Soil Conservation Aot are napecial el--:otIons" as oontraatedwith *general electIonsw,and being such, we look first to the Aat an4 Its moessary Implloatlonsfor thr prooedure to be Sollowed. Xallis v. H. S. Williama,
101 Tex. 396. The Aot elves the State Board broad authoritywith reterenoe to Cleotions provided Sor therein8 It merely directs that they be held in oonformity to the General Eleotlon Laws. In our opinion, this 1s merely a gensral dlrrotion to the Boar4 apb as t0 the details of the elaotlon suoh as 4eaIgnatIn8polling pleaes, the dlaoretion la nlth the State Board. This position ia SortiSle by the feat that there is nothing In the General Eleotion Laws speoISloallYProvi4ing that all eleotlons shall be held at the *pollIne PlaQes" ox "voting boxes* deal~mted by the County COmmIssIeners' Court; au4 further, by the Seat that there Is nothIng in Hon. V. C. Marshall, Page 4 the Ganaral xleOtiOn Lai%¶speolfyingWhat per8On Or body shall designate the wpolling pLecee”, it being merely implied that the person or body in charge of the eleation shall do so. The Board would hsvs the same authority in this reapeat as would the Commlsslonere*Court or city oOuOi1, with reSp8Ot t0 eleotlone vihlahthey “oonduot and supervise*. It has been held by this departmentthat under the Aot, inoorporated alties and towns should not be included in soil conservationalstrlotsand that land- omers, to be eligible to vote, must reside in the distriot (whiahwould, of oourse, mean that they aould not vote if residents or an lnaorporatedolty or town). Attorney Generel’s Oplnlon No-O-1353, September 30, 1939. It has ale0 been held by this department that in an eleotion held under the above quoted seotlons, *voting boxesw or “polling plaaeV shall be provided ln eaah eleotlon preoinot, pre- viously formed by the CommIssionera*Court of the oomty under authority of Artlale
2935, supra. Attorney Oeneral’s Opinion No.O-1495, Ootober 10,‘1939. The latter opinion tight.be construed to mean that the partioular voting boxes* or “polling plaoss” ordinsrllyused In eaoh eleotion precinot ehould be used in eleatlonaheld under the Aot. Such eonstruc3tlon 1s not to be placed on that opinion. The writer or that opinion used the words “voting box* intending them to mean *voting preolnot*, as will be seen from reading them In oonneotionwith the question asked and the entire paragraph, of whioh they are s part. In your quoted statement, you say, Wevidently the Board has no authoritybeyond the bounaarleaof s pro- posed soil croneervatlon,dietriot,and therefore en eleotlon oannot be held within the aorporatellmlts Or the City 0r ~0mpw. YilthoUtoommentlngon the aorreotnessof your oonolueion,one way or the other, ainoe It has been held that the oonvenienoeof the voter 1s to be ooneidered in the holding or sleatlons,Dubose V. w00a8, 163 5. W. 3, and since a sol1 conservationdlstrlot should not inolude any part.of aa inoorporatedtown, you are advised that Where a partloular voting preolnat has within it8 boundaries soma territorywhloh Is also within the OOrPOratelimits of a city or town, the Board should desimate as the “Polling P~SCB* a place 1ooateC iiiViZ portion of the preoimt which lies outside the city or toWL Rowever, with feepeat Hon. V. G. I$arshall,Page 5 to your question,namely, the vlagallty"or the election, if it were otherwise legal and no oue were distranchised thereby, the rasults would probably be sustainedby the courts, though the "polling placav was not even located Ephe boundariesof the preclnat. RalE. Parish, . ., 151 E. Vi.1089. As to the legality of the election if held within tha precinct and aleo within the corporate limits 0r a town, such as Temple, it is our opinion that its legality would likewise be sustainedby the courts. With regsrd to the selection of "polling places", your attention 1s respectfullydirected to Article 2932, I;.C. S. of Texas, 1925, which says that where practicable 80 to do, all elections shall be held in a public building within the limits of the election precinctwhere the alec- tion is being held. This provision of course is advisory and not mandatory, and, in our opinion, whether or not it were foIlowed would be within the sound disavetion of the Board. Therefore,it is the opltiionof this department, and you are so advised, that the answer to your question is that the "voting box" for an election held in con- nection with the organizationof a soil conservationdis- trict, when part.of the precinct lies within the boundaries of an incorporatedcity or town, should be located outside the city limits; but, if the elecmere held at a box located within the city limits and it were otherwiselegal and no one were disfranchisedthereby, the election could not be successfullyattacked in the courts. Trusting that this satisfictorilyanswers your inquiry,we are Yours very truly hTTORN%p GENEF~ Oy TEXA8 JN:ET BY APPROVED NOV 17, 1939 James Noel Assistant h2ala c Mann ATTORREY'DENERALOF TEXAS APPROVED opinion committee By B'hB bhairmell
Document Info
Docket Number: O-1626
Judges: Gerald Mann
Filed Date: 7/2/1939
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017