Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                   OFFICE     OF THE ATTORNEY    GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    a*      c MANN
    All----
    Honorable V. 0. ?darehall.,
    Ohairman
    sttte Soil ConservetlonEOt%4
    ProfestionslBulldIne
    Temple, Texas
    Dear Sirr
    This will no                    pt of pour letter
    of Oatobfc 19, requeet              on rr05 this depart-
    o? 'PornpIe
    is the preolno8
    ot l%ndownen tot0 who lirs
    eide the eorperste l5mlt# within this prsalnat
    OS the pririlqp of rotin~.
    @The purpose of the S.&uaa ie written,
    an4 the prooielons under whish it mwt be earrisd
    out, seems to be such ~6 plsaea the Beard       ohrged
    Hon. V. C. Marehall, Pace 2
    with the responsIbIlItyof aarrplne the law
    ;;t, In an llnpoaalblaposition. Our question
    : Is it possible for the State Board to
    proaaed with electiona ior the oreatlon of
    Sol1 ConservationDistricts an4 meet the re-
    quirements OS the law as wrltten'lv
    COnstruing your questionwhioh Is In Itself verF
    broad, along with the iaota furnished an4 the Attorney hen-
    eral'e Opinions Numbers O-906, 0-lEO4, O-1383 an4 O-1496,
    us 4eduoe that ou want to know whether an elaation ha14
    aa provided In ieotioh 5, subdIvIsIonsc, D an4 R of ths
    Stats 9011 ConaaroationAot, Ii.B. No. 20, 46th Legislature,
    will be legal IT the "voting boxv or vpol1I.u~plaae" (where the
    votes are oaat) Is looatad within tha corporatelimits of a
    oity; that Is, where the preolnot Itsalf embraoea territory
    Iu the oity Unit6 an4 territory outside the olty 1Imlts.
    Frequently,ths term Voting box* arid"voting
    preainat~ are used loosely as having the same meaning.  i7e
    aeorlbe to them CIff.%rent meanings. Voting praolnot" has
    reference to an area defined as suah by the oounty oom-
    misslonera~ oourt. Artfoles 2933, 2934, an4 E935, R. C. S.
    of Texas, 1925. Voting box" has refersnoe to the plaoe
    or looatlon where the alsotlon Itself is held, tha WpollIng
    plaoew. Artloles 2931 an4 2932, R. C. S. of Texas.
    Iu our latter and example, you reter    to the
    *Tecupla  west it ountry boxW ae being a plaoe within tha aor-
    porate limIts~,oiTemple whera people vote. It Is assume4
    that you we the word Voting box* In the sam mm80 as
    we. Or4lnerIly,suoh an arraneemantwould present no
    problem, so long aa tha loaatlon OZ ths "voting bat*
    was   within the boundaries of the praolnot. Rowever, It
    would present a problem In sums oa8eY as in municipal
    electionswhloh has been taken oars oi by statuts. ArtioleS
    2931, 2934 an4 2951, R. C. S. of Texas 1925. No such OX-
    press   provIsIons have bean made for the elaotions IuquIrs4
    about by you. The pertinent provision8      of tha S0f.lWn-
    servation 
    Aat, supra
    , hereafter referred to as the Aot, are
    as tolloW0:
    "C. . . To assist the Boar4 In tha de-
    tarmInatIonof auoh a4miuIetretivepraatiaa-
    bIlIty an4 fsaeIbIlItp,It ahall'be tha 4ut
    of tha Board, within a reasonable time ai&
    en$ry of the findine that there is usa4 far
    Hon. V. C. Earshall, Pace 3
    the or~anlxatIonOS the proposed dlstrlot and
    the determinationof the boundsrise  thereof,
    to hold an eleatlon within the propose4 4Istriot
    UPon the ProPosltlon of the creationor the
    dlstrlot, and to OQU8e due not100 OS suoh
    eleatlo:~to be Riven, whloh notioe shall set
    forth the boundaries of the proposed 4IstrIot.
    . . ."
    "D. The Eoaf4 shall pay all expenses Sor
    the issuanoe OS suoh notioes a~& the conduot OS
    suoh hearlugs an4 eleotlons,and shall supervisa
    the oonduot OS suoh hearlnps and elaotious.lt
    h 11 I      mropriate regulationsgovemlIng-
    :h: oonde::;:I'suoh hearlnus and eleatione, and
    provldlnfifor the regletratlonprior to the date
    OS the cieatlon OS all eligible voters. All
    such elcctlons held uuder the provisionaOS this
    Act shall be In oonformltp with the General Leo-
    tion Laws of thle state, except as herein otherwise
    provided, an4 sroept that the ballot shall not be
    numbered  or marke4 Sor I4entIfIoatIonpurposes.
    *E. The Boar4 shall publish the result of
    such eleatIon an4 shall thrreafteroonslder ah&
    determine whether the operation of the dlstrlot
    within the defined boundaries Is e4mInIstratIvely
    praotloablean4 feasible . . .v (Underaoorlng
    ours)
    Elections he14 under the State Soil Conservation
    Aot   are napecial el--:otIons"
    as oontraatedwith *general
    electIonsw,and being such, we look first to the Aat an4 Its
    moessary Implloatlonsfor thr prooedure to be Sollowed.
    Xallis v. H. S. Williama, 
    101 Tex. 396
    . The Aot elves the
    State Board broad authoritywith reterenoe to Cleotions
    provided Sor therein8 It merely directs that they be held
    in oonformity to the General Eleotlon Laws. In our opinion,
    this 1s merely a gensral dlrrotion to the Boar4 apb as t0
    the details of the elaotlon suoh as 4eaIgnatIn8polling
    pleaes, the dlaoretion la nlth the State Board. This
    position ia SortiSle by the feat that there is nothing In
    the General Eleotion Laws speoISloallYProvi4ing that
    all eleotlons shall be held at the *pollIne PlaQes" ox
    "voting boxes* deal~mted by the County COmmIssIeners'
    Court; au4 further, by the Seat that there Is nothIng in
    Hon. V. C. Marshall, Page 4
    the Ganaral xleOtiOn  Lai%¶speolfyingWhat per8On  Or body shall
    designate the wpolling pLecee”, it being merely implied that
    the person or body in charge of the eleation shall do so.
    The Board would hsvs the same authority in this reapeat
    as would the Commlsslonere*Court or city oOuOi1,    with
    reSp8Ot  t0 eleotlone vihlahthey “oonduot and supervise*.
    It has been held by this departmentthat under
    the Aot, inoorporated     alties and towns should not be
    included in soil conservationalstrlotsand that land-
    omers, to be eligible to vote, must reside in the distriot
    (whiahwould, of oourse, mean that they aould not vote if
    residents or an lnaorporatedolty or town). Attorney
    Generel’s Oplnlon No-O-1353, September 30, 1939. It has
    ale0 been held by this department     that in an eleotion held
    under the above quoted seotlons, *voting boxesw or “polling
    plaaeV shall be provided ln eaah eleotlon preoinot, pre-
    viously formed by the CommIssionera*Court of the oomty
    under authority of Artlale 
    2935, supra
    . Attorney Oeneral’s
    Opinion No.O-1495, Ootober 10,‘1939. The latter opinion
    tight.be construed to mean that the partioular voting
    boxes* or “polling plaoss” ordinsrllyused In eaoh eleotion
    precinot ehould be used in eleatlonaheld under the Aot.
    Such eonstruc3tlon    1s not to be placed on that opinion. The
    writer or that opinion used the words “voting box* intending
    them to mean *voting preolnot*, as will be seen from reading
    them In oonneotionwith the question asked and the entire
    paragraph, of whioh they are s part.
    In your quoted statement, you say, Wevidently
    the Board has no authoritybeyond the bounaarleaof s pro-
    posed soil croneervatlon,dietriot,and therefore en eleotlon
    oannot be held within the aorporatellmlts Or the City
    0r  ~0mpw.    YilthoUtoommentlngon the aorreotnessof
    your oonolueion,one way or the other, ainoe It has been
    held that the oonvenienoeof the voter 1s to be ooneidered
    in the holding or sleatlons,Dubose V. w00a8,   163 5. W. 3,
    and since a sol1 conservationdlstrlot should not inolude
    any part.of aa inoorporatedtown, you are advised that Where
    a partloular voting preolnat has within it8 boundaries soma
    territorywhloh Is also within the OOrPOratelimits of a
    city or town, the Board should desimate as the “Polling
    P~SCB*  a place 1ooateC iiiViZ portion of the preoimt
    which lies outside the city or toWL Rowever, with feepeat
    Hon.    V. G. I$arshall,Page 5
    to your question,namely, the vlagallty"or the election,
    if it were otherwise legal and no oue were distranchised
    thereby, the rasults would probably be sustainedby the
    courts, though the "polling placav was not even located
    Ephe       boundariesof the preclnat. RalE.      Parish,
    .    ., 151 E. Vi.1089. As to the legality of the
    election if held within tha precinct and aleo within the
    corporate limits 0r a town, such as Temple, it is our
    opinion that its legality would likewise be sustainedby
    the courts.
    With regsrd to the selection of "polling places",
    your attention 1s respectfullydirected to Article 2932,
    I;.C. S. of Texas, 1925, which says that where practicable
    80 to do, all elections shall be held in a public building
    within the limits of the election precinctwhere the alec-
    tion is being held. This provision of course is advisory
    and not mandatory, and, in our opinion, whether or not it
    were foIlowed would be within the sound disavetion of the
    Board.
    Therefore,it is the opltiionof this department,
    and you are so advised, that the answer to your question
    is that the "voting box" for an election held in con-
    nection with the organizationof a soil conservationdis-
    trict, when part.of the precinct lies within the boundaries
    of an incorporatedcity or town, should be located outside
    the city limits; but, if the elecmere      held at a box
    located within the city limits and it were otherwiselegal
    and no one were disfranchisedthereby, the election could
    not be successfullyattacked in the courts.
    Trusting that this satisfictorilyanswers your
    inquiry,we are
    Yours very truly
    hTTORN%p GENEF~ Oy TEXA8
    JN:ET
    BY
    APPROVED NOV 17, 1939                                James Noel
    Assistant
    h2ala     c   Mann
    ATTORREY'DENERALOF TEXAS             APPROVED
    opinion committee
    By B'hB
    bhairmell
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1626

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017