Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  • .
    OFFICE   OF THE   AlTORNEY    GENERAL    OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    E, or t?la ctEt0 carretttu-
    Ll tsrat1anOf gubli0    pm-
    8 Constltutlaa rimaxra pra-
    y wl;i.ch58 privlitaly omxid
    ,rtlclc 7138, Li;octlai: 4,
    srntlitae: grwldea t.hnt "A.1 pmprty
    bclon&,q   to tbr, 32itis3 Ytatea shull
    , but the statutss nowhere attmpt       to
    property wh;hPchLs ~>r~:viitely ~'mcd,
    ltcd stat68 Qx? a lodurnl i3,genoy. mchl.ag
    '%P the tk;:tau statas sxcrlpts IxlCh -propsporty
    fX'oataxation by ?30 etata and cotxaty.
    -met pivate   property 15 used exalwlvoly
    far public  pr?caerr do&m 113% c!mi@3 tl32 mturs oi
    tho property   OF the tftle   tharuto   80 AS   to   oomort
    .
    ~0s. Ceo. H. Shwp,gard, rage    e
    it into publio prapertp.m
    It may be urged that the rental rcqulred to be paid
    by aorkse ~rogrees AdEdnistration ~111 be more with the st~t.e    l
    ad OouatY f=X% the property than it wauld be otherwise.
    xi so, the burden lefd on the yedoral Covexnmnt US at nmt
    only~an indirect One and not such as to forbid the levy and
    colleatlon  of such tams.   In the aass or Jones ~8. EZUVOi2on-
    struotlon co., 302 D. S. 134, opinion by Chief Justice Ewhes,
    it was held that an oacupation tax measured by ~08s income is
    not invalid where inposed by a state upon a contraator with
    the United States as laying a direct burden on the Federal Gay-
    mamt,~ even though the kqosition     of the tax nay lnarease the
    cost to the. goverumnt of the work oontraoted to be done.
    Ftllure to tax th$s property would be to violato AZ-
    %?       8, Ssotlon 1, of the Constltutltn of Texas, provldlly
    :
    aTexstfon shall be e~$ml and uulfora,    All
    prcqWty in #lo St&c, whether mmed by natu-
    ,ral persons or corporetlons athoe than munioi-
    pal, shall be taxed in proportion to its value
    .whiah shrill be asaertalned as may be provided
    by law.”
    The properties mentioned    in said questions are sub-
    jeot to tax by the county and state and both of’ your guestiohS
    are answered in the negative.      Correspondence attached te your
    Pequest Fould Indicate that there may be scn38 o_ue8tlon as to
    nhether Works irogrose i,duiniistretion is r,ayiug any rental on
    one piece or this property, or is receiving the use or It @a-
    _        us.    .‘a may be Gathered f ram v&at we huve already said, that
    is an &material oohslderatlor.       ‘I?:e property is none the less
    privately owned,
    Your0 very truly
    ..
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1621

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017