Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                                                  450
    OFFICE   OF THE ATTORNEY    GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    .~ \
    , !
    \\ \
    /-‘.---.i
    Hon. Olin Culberson,&ige        2
    and oS that held by them ln storage, and also
    0s   their   SOUPCB   or supply,   the   nrtnbe~   0f ~0n3
    Srcm which they draw thelr supply, the mount
    41 jcessure malntalned,andthe    mount and
    cbaraoterand deaorlptlon  OS the equipment em-
    ployed, and 6uoh other matters p
    the business %a the Comlsalon lfLz%eszi-
    nont."
    pphlle we are ln entire agreePent with the prinalplea
    stated In our previous opfaionto the effectthatlntheevent
    of any doubt es to the neaws.tty Sor notice and hearing on
    rule8 and regulationsthe doubt should be reeolmd    ln favor
    of the iesuenoe OS said notlae an&the holdlag OS a hearing.
    However, in the absenoe OS statutory requlrauaents lt la our
    i;ll$S that the CQSO of Ore@ V. Xailraad C0m1lss ion OS ma,
    117 S. W. (2d) 142 (error disariesed) le aontrolllng.
    We q&e   from that aam as Sollogr.
    *There Is no aompelllag~lnhr3rent maeon
    why notloe aab baring should    be mqulred as
    prerequlslte to the vslldlty of a general
    rule  and r~egulatlon OS adminlstratlre boards.
    f7.10intlmete knowledge possessed by the COIE-
    mlesion, aSSord8 ample basis for dlnpepalng with
    notfoe when general regulatory opder~ am con-
    08Tll94. nle wide rarlety 0r highmys end tr%r-
    ii0 oondltlona may call Sor exeeptlons as re-
    gards given localltles, particular alasses OS
    commodltlesor omrlera, or 6V8ri individual
    a%lTlers.   It aauld sot be praotlaalto con-
    sider all OS these spealal oasea ln the pro-
    nmlgatlon ot general regulatlone . . . . &ad
    the Legislature latendedthatnotlw      and hear-
    lngshouldbehatllncaseoSgene.ral      ordera,
    It ooad eaolly hare so provided. Its absence
    In thls regard, and its presence in the apeol-
    rmilly emmarated aasw alearly bdlaate that
    In the former, It was not deemed esa~ntkl.~
    The 0as Vtllltles kot &me, in oertaln lmtaa6ee,
    spealflaallyrequlre the giving o? notloe and the ZaoLdlagof
    a hearing before the lssuao~e of Orders in regard (I) to
    peals fra  C&ty Ordlnanoss%a provided by ArtlaZe $060; (27"
    as regards review of r&as, agreestents, and orders aiiscrthg
    452
    Hon. Olin Culberson, rage 3
    publla utllltles, as pmtided      in titicle 6054.   However, ln
    ,irticls 6056, pursuant to whlah the proposed rule5 andrcs&u-
    latlons are sought to be issued, there ls no suchrequlrement.
    Eramdnatlon of that .4rtlale olearly reveals t&t only orders
    and regulatfocur afft4atlq3 the lndustrygenerellymiy       bels-
    slled.   Further,   the subject  mstter of suah orders and regula-
    tions S%ll within the oategory OS knowledge and lnfonnatlon
    peoulie&       known to tho experts of the Gas Utllltles Ulvlslon
    OS the 2 afI2od CoxQl55lon. They know what Information they
    need ln way of reaorda      to properly regulate the industry. k
    notlae and hearing thereo+muld        serve no purpose. It is to
    be noted that the Comnlssloa Is euthorlz~d to elicit @forma-
    tion tn regard to quantities OS gas distributed and of that
    held by them in storage, and also oS their      source OS 5uppl.y,
    the number of wells Srom which tbep draw their supply, the
    amount of pressure mslntained, the amount and oharaoter and
    desorlptlonor the equlpmnt employed and such other matttie
    perta$ning to the business as the Commlsslon may deen ge           -
    nent .   Tn&he~words,therequlrerpants        oath   ?  llroad C OIS-
    -Ion      that may be made 'pursuant to Artlale &bz, simply
    have   to dowlth themaklng otrecords and books, amlreports
    aireotlng all the industry, generally and alike.
    Further     quotlsg from Just106 xcClendon*s oplnlon ln
    the Greer ease:
    YiaU the Laglslatme  intended that notlas
    andhearlng  should behadlncase    ofgeaersl
    order, It oould easily bare 50 protidti       . . .*
    This Department hasrendereda   Ukeoplnlon   lnre-
    gard to notice and hearing on m.l&oad  ConmIssIonorders pur-
    porting to regulate bus temlnsls lo this state. Oplnlon No.
    O-1107, doted August 23, 1939, a&%ressed to the Honorable
    James E. Kllday, Dlreator, Xotor Transportation Dl~l.5105,
    Rallxoacl   Codsslon       OS Texas.
    The order there
    under d.Lmas6lon, as here, lmolved
    generalm&tars          aSSeating
    the industry as a whole and ia re-
    specttowhlchtherewas      no statutoryrequlrenzentior  notlee
    and hearing. i~aaordlx@.yg, ln reliance upon the doetrlm oS
    the Greer case, we declared no notice and hearing xwa%BsaFy.
    Hon. Olin Culber6on, Page 4
    It is ouropinlonthatthaRallroad   Coml55lon
    may issue   rules -4 regulatlont5pumuant to mtlala 6056,
    3
    APPROVE!:OCT 2, 1939
    ATTORNEY.GBNERAL, 02 TmEJ
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1506

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017