Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •    OFFICE   OF THE AlTORNN      GENERAL   OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    Eon.&yneIalbYr8
    countyiwitor
    c4 *=m
    80, n, 0. E. 1911, r8aes 88 follcnmr
    1 be allawed the county judge
    of one per otmtupon
    of rwoh am~cttim, ad-
    Y upon the approyal
    Hon. Wayne Iefevw,    Page 2
    Article 
    3850, supra
    , was.bro~ht   lorward,ln
    the Revised Civil Statutes of 1925 in Artlole    3926, whioh
    reads in part a8 followsr
    "The oounty judge shall   also   reoelve    the
    following   Sees:
    "1. d oom``laelon or one-half   OS one per
    oent upon the eotual oaeh reaelpta of eaoh
    exeaubor, administrator   or guardian,    upon the
    approval ol the 'exhlblhe end the rinal settle-
    ment of the aooouut of suah exeo'utor, adminia-
    trator or guardian, but no uore than one suah
    oomlselon   shall be ohargecl,on any emouut m-
    osived  by any suah exeautor,   administrator   or
    guardian,"
    We quote from the ease of Oriae vs.           Coolep,   et
    170 6W 1088, as follows!
    "When are the aomiasiona    pmvlUsQ tar
    by Artlole 3250 (mm Art. 39261 payable')         ft
    is the oontention o? appellant.that      thay a+
    not payable until the guartlian'e final aooount
    Is approved., Appelleee oontend that they a*
    payable upon all oaah reaeipte shown by any
    annuati~eoount OS the guarilhn, wheti euah dooount
    Is approved by the jutl e to whcm It Is presslit-
    ed.   Omitting r0=at   f er5,the artlole    provide19
    that the aounty judge, in addition to other
    apecliied   fees, shall %I allowed .*..,       ~'o~QI-
    mission of one-half of 1 er sent. upon the ao-
    teal cash reoeipta of eaog i..,. guardian         upon
    the approval of the exhchibfta and the f&l
    settlement of the aooount of suoh . . . . guaMIan,*
    provided only one suoh oharge shall be made.
    Prooeaalng on the theory that the faglalature,~
    when It enaotod that euoh ices should bk'pald
    *upon' the approvnl of the exhiblfs'and      the'
    rlnaz settlement of the aaoount' of the guar-
    dian, intended that full rorae and efffsot should
    Eon. Weyne Lefevre,     Page 3
    be given to both pmvislone,          we oonolude
    that suoh ommlrrdons may be payable upon
    approval of the annual eocount or upon
    approval of the final eaoount, depending
    upon when the ~rdIan         resolved the money
    upon whIoh the ocnnmIee.ion Ie.sou@t           to be
    ool?ected.     For illustration,      it;upoti
    presentation    of an annual aooount         It
    discloses    that oaeh has been reae i ved by
    t:-!e tpuxrdian p~rlorto such preaentatfon           .
    and subsequent to any last annual aooount,
    such guardianwould       be en%Itl+d to the
    speolfIed    ooErmlssfona upon the approval
    of the acoount 80 preeented.          On the other
    hand, if it appears fz~m the guardlan*s.
    f’inal acoount that slnae his last annual
    aooount further cash hae been received,
    he would be entitled       to his oommlaslon
    thereon upon the approve1 of suah final
    aaaount . The reierende to the approval
    OS the guardian18 exhibits         and the approval
    0r   Ns final eooount we regard ue merely
    rixinC:the period or time when~the county
    .judge may tax hls owimlsslons.            By Article
    4186, R. E. 1911, guardlane are required
    to present an annual aoaount’under oath
    showing, amory; other thinKs, ‘a ocmplete
    aooount of reoelpts end disbursements
    olnoe the last annual eooount.’ .Upon pr?-
    eentatlon of suoh annual account, It Is
    by subsequent provIsIons         of the statutes
    made the duty of the then presiding             county
    judge to oonduat a hearing thereon, and,
    Ii he is satisfied       that/the    aooount le
    oorreot,     it is his duty to approve -s=e.
    Ravbq made It the duty of tho.oounty
    judr~e to approve such eooounta, and ha*-
    I= allowi$ a fee of one-h&!            Of 1 per
    oent. upon the ‘eatual oaeh reoeipts
    shown thereby, It surely follows,            It Seerae
    to us, that the oommisaiona are payable
    upon ouoh appaoval, for the reason that
    Eon. !‘&ayneLerevre, bee    4
    they were clearly      Intended for the~beneflt
    of the c?rrlcer psrromlng the duty, and,
    having been so Intended, It was never oon-
    tonplated that he should forego hls cc%-
    pensatlm until final settlenmt-a%:$hF           es-
    tate,   particularly    when final settlemit
    nIQht not oonm until artier the lapse of
    $.nfn~ars     and the possible death of the
    WJ do not, as lndloated,    thlnk.
    the ref&enoe      to flnal settlesent   at ellsman-
    ln@ess.      It Is very pmbebly tbst In many
    2uardlanshlp ~roceedln~s oash would be re-
    oaived by tho ~uaMlan In the .perIod in-
    tervening between his last annual aooouut
    and the flnal account.       If such oash was
    received,    the oounty judge who hedtmd
    approved such final      aooount would; be .on-
    titled   to the comlsslon      thereon, and the
    8010 pwpos~, in 0~s opinion, for say rate*
    en06 to final settleaent,       was to aeoure
    the osf loer In ths peymmt of the Yees aa-
    crulng at that time and whloh oould not
    be done under the ~rovlalon covering anuual
    accounts.
    "'We have treated the word *exhibits',
    in article    J&50, as referring      to annual
    aooounts.     Wile It may not be said that the
    exhibit,   either literalLy     or in legal oontem-
    pletlon,   meens account, It Is well knm that
    aooounts are often attached to plsadlngs          es
    exhlblts.     Such oustom, taken In oonnection with
    the reference     In the ssns,atiIole      to oash pe-
    aeipts rsqulred.to     be shovs.ln snuual aocounta
    by article    4106, l?. 8. 1911, and the further
    faot that the annual aaoouuts required Oi
    &her fidualarles      are referred to ns snnual
    exhibits   (articles   324., 3242, R. 2. 19.911)
    sue in our'oplnlon     sufflclent     basis for hold-
    ing that anmal accounts were Intended."
    Artlolfe3320   and 3321,   R. C. S. read as fol-
    low3 :
    "h-t. 3320. Exeoutors end adminietra-
    tort? shall ma& annual exhibits     under oath,
    fully nhowlnq the ccndltlon     or the estate;
    they shall n&n final settlement of the eu-
    tatea they represent.rithin    three years from
    the 3-t     of letters,  unless the tfms be extended
    by the oourt after satlsfaotory     showing laeda
    under oath; and, upon fatiure     in either 0888,
    shall be removed as provided     by law.
    "Art. 3321. Any exhibit made by qn ere-
    outor or administrator         showing a list   of
    olaims allowed and approved or established
    a&nst      the estate he represents,        or ehavt@g
    the condition-of        said estate and an aooount
    of all money received ati paid out on aoootmt
    of 8atd eatate,       returned   to the oourt betore
    the liliyr      of the aocount for final*eettle-
    ment, 5hal.l     be filed with the clerk, and
    notioe of muoh filw           shall be posted at
    the oourthouse door tcr ten days from the
    postin&      after whloh the onurt shall examine.
    aald exhibit,      and if correct,     render judqent
    of approval thereon and order it to be reoord-
    ed."
    In vim of the foregoing   authorities,  you are
    respectfully  advised that it.ia the oplnion.of   this de-
    partment thst the one-half of one per cent oommlst3ion
    iron the reoelpts of properties   handled bye an adminis-
    trator is paya!:le to the county judge upon the aubmlsslon
    of exhibits and the annual report and that auoh oommlesfon
    is not payable at the time of the sales “of the property.
    TrustLng that the foregoing     answers your inquiry,
    we remain
    Very truly   yours
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1072

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017