Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  • Non. E. B. Lewis
    County Attorney
    Cherokee County
    Rusk, Texas
    Dear Sir:             Opinion ~No.‘o-1257
    Re: Appointment by.'widowbf brother
    of her deceased,husband; a&with-
    In th6,Nepotcsm Law.> :
    Wis~h&veyour ,telegraphi'&          August 7,
    I??tifiesF.?;,of
    1939, in which you ask,the following questf6h: ',.. .~
    Where the sheriff of Cherokee County was killed,
    his widow appointed to fill his unexpired term, there being no
    children; may the widow appoint her deceased husband's brother
    as deputy sheriff?
    Article 432, Penal Code,~1925, the so-called
    "Nepotism" Law, reads as follows:
    ,"No officer of this State or any officer ``
    of any district, county, city, precinct, school
    district, nor other munlciptilkubdiylslon,of this State,
    or any officer or member of any State, district, county,
    city 3 school district or other municipal board, or
    judge of any court, created by ,orunder authority of
    any general or special law of this State, or any
    member ,of the Legislature, shall appoint, or vote
    for, or confirm the appointment to any office, po:
    sition, clerkship, employment or duty, of any per-
    son related within the second degree by affinity or
    within the third degree by consanguinity to the per-
    son so appointing or so voting, or to any other
    member of any sudh board, the Legislature, or court
    of which such person so appointing or voting may be
    a member, when the salary, fees, or compensation of
    such appointee is to be paid for, directly or indi-
    rectly, out of or from public funds or fees of office
    of any kind or character whatsoever."
    247
    .Hon.E. B. Lewis, Page #t.
    The rollowing quotation taken rr0m the aase or
    Leafs vs. GIRalr, 130 S. W. (2df 919, by the Austin Court
    of Civil Appeals, governs the detera&natlonor this question:
    -Death of the spoaae terminatea the rela-
    tionship by afrinity; if, however, the marriage
    has resulted in issue who are still living, the
    relationshipby affinity oontlnuea.*
    See also StrlngrallOw~8. State, 42 Tax~*Or.,Rep.
    504, 61 S. VI.719; 2 C.J. p. 379.
    Since you state that there were no lab& ~rr&i'tlia
    union of the deceased sharlff and hla widow, whanaw.ea~w-
    as sheriff by appointment,the widow is no longer related
    by afrlnlty to the brother of her deoeaaed husband, and,
    therefore, she may appoint tha brother of har deoaaaad
    husband as a deputy sheriff, ulthout violating the Provlaions
    of Artiole 432, Penal Code, quoted above.
    Yours   gery truly
    ATTORNEY   GZNERAL OF TBXAS
    R. W. Palrahlld
    Aaalatant
    RpJFxpbp     APPROVEUAUG19; 1939
    ATTORREYGENERAL OP TEXAS
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1257

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017