Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                       OFFICE   OF THE ATTORNEY       GENERAL    OFTEXAS
    AUSTIN
    GCULD   C. MANN
    .-“”    ..*UIL
    Honorable C. J. Vllds
    Co'untyAuditor
    Xueces County
    Corpus Chrlatl,
    Dear Slrx
    Your request                           following ques-
    ticnsr
    e of marking
    ossor-Colleo-
    d the taking of
    y Tax kaaessnrs by
    lolatlon ai Sootion
    farring tc oountles
    00.00 per annum?
    d    your answer to QUr?StiOn number 1
    the employees did not teke an
    T3. Would the paynent for ovortlme to e1p-
    ployoea who sra drawing the maxlmm salary al-
    lowed under Sectloa 3 of Artlola 3902 be a
    violation of that Artlola?*
    Artlols 3902# Revised Civil Statutes of Texas,
    in part, reads as follows:
    Honorable C. J. Wilde, Page 2
    Whenever any district, counte or nroo!nct
    officer shall require tho services of deputies,
    asslstnnts or olerks in the nerformanoe of his
    duties he shall apply to the County Covmlsslcnars*
    Court of his county for authority to appoint euch
    deputies, assistants or olerks, stating by sworn
    application the number needed, the position to be
    filled and the amount to be paid. Said applloa-
    tlon shall be accompanied by a statezent sbowlng
    the probable rocelpts from fees, aommlsslons -and
    oo-Apensatlonto be oolleoted by said office dur-
    in3 the fiscal year and the probable disbursements
    whloh shall lnolude all salaries and oxponsas of
    said oftloe; and said court shall make its order
    nuthorlzlng the appointment of such deputfes,
    assistants and clerks and fir the compensation
    to be paid the.mwithin the llmitat6ons herein
    prescribed and determine the nuzbor to be appolnt-
    ed as inthe dlscretlcn of said court may bo proper;
    prorldcd tbst in no case shall the Coms&sloners*
    Court or any mczber thereof sttezpt to influence
    the aorointzientof any person as deouty, assistant
    or clerk in any office. Upon the entry of suoh
    order the officers applying for such asslGtants,
    deputies or clerks shall be authorized to appoint
    them; provided that said compensation shall not
    exceed the maxlmun amount heroinafter set out.
    The oompensatlon which may be allowed to the deputies,
    as?istants or clerks above named for their services.
    shall be a reasonable one not to exceed the iollow-
    lng amounts: . . . .      (Underscoring ours)
    Yn counties having a population of thlrty-
    seven tbousond five hundred and one (37,501) and not
    core thon sixty thousand (60,000) lnhabltonts, first
    assistant or cblef deputy not to exceed Twenty-one
    Hundred ($2100.00) Dollars per annum; other assistants,
    8e2uties  or clerks not to exoeed Eighteen Iiundrod
    ($lSOO.OO) Dollars per annui eaoh. Provided that
    nothing in this Act shall be oonstrued as repealing
    or affeotlng Section 2 of R. B. NO. 694, Chapter 315,
    Acts 1935, Forty-fourth Legislature, page 724. . . .*
    The population of Nuaces County. Texas, aooordlng
    to the 1930 Federal Census in 61,779.
    wConmlosloners* Court are courts Of
    llnlted jurlsdlotlon, in that their author-
    lty extends,only to matters pertaining to
    Honorable C. J. Wilde, PaFe 3
    the Ganoral welBfr6 of their respootlvo
    oountlas and that their powers nra only
    those expressly or lnpllodly oonierrad u?Oir
    t!+emby low, - that is, by the Constitution
    snd statutas of ,the state.* 11 Taxes Jurls-
    prudence 564-565.
    *The appolnt:centof deputies, ctlof
    clerks’,or  assistants  by oartoln olfloera
    is ~poclflcolly authorized by the stetutes.
    Under the fianaralstatutory law, corrnty
    offloers oomlne within tha provlalons of
    the ziarlzumfee bill are required to apply
    to th6 oot;l:5issioners'~courtfforauthority
    to appoint deputies, asslstrtntsor olerks,
    end awh oourt may naka an order auth,orlz-
    lng their appolntmont, dotermine the nun-
    ber to be appoln!ad, and fix the cozponsa-
    tlon to Abe paid them within oortnln pra-
    scribed limits. In no ease nay the oom-
    slsaioaets' oourt or any member thereor
    atte.mptto influence the appointment of
    any person as deputy, assistant or clerk in
    any office. Prior to the Bna-tmont of
    the zoneral statute county offloezs deter-
    mined for tiiems~6lves tha qucstlon of empltiy-
    lng deputies, and made cont.ractsfor their
    oorjpansntlon,but now the State Cetorzinas
    tba necessity for e;nploylnethauiand their
    aumber ,aad oozpensatlon.
    "The authority thus conferred tipon
    the com.zlsslcners*oourt to aoslst in ths
    appolntzont of deputies can be exerolsad
    only in the ;Paanerpresorlbed. If tho
    stotutory reyulroments are not compllad
    slth, the appolntzent of a deputy IS void,
    rendha pap be ousted through quo warrant0
    prooaedln,~sat the instance of the State. . . ."
    Texas Jur.Ptprudenoe,Vol. 34. I 155, p* 602.
    *This provlslon manifests a pub110
    polloy to enpower oounty and preolnot Olfl-
    oera gonerally to solaot their Laputlcs and
    asSlst9ntS, and tc forbid the ComzAssicnera~
    Col;rtfrot attospting to lnfluonoe thornin
    tho eeileotlonof tholr assistants.. 'The
    roason.fGr this polioy is that OffiOerS
    eleotad to dlsohargo pub110 trusts, end
    upon who% the respoaslblllty for tho pro-
    per
    Honorable C. J. Wilde, Pa&e 4
    per dlsoharne thereof rests, should be free
    to seleot persons of their own oholce to
    assist them." Neeper vs. Stewart, 66 S. E. (2d)
    812.
    The statutes do not provide for such offices as,
    vRepresent3tlves of the Cormnlssloners~Court*.
    The Deputy Tax Assessors-Collectors are the
    deputies of the Tax Assessor-Collootor, responsible to
    their superior and enployor, the Tax Assessor-Collector,
    and are not "representatives of tha Co~nmlsslGnersfCourt",
    .andare not responsible to the Connisslonerst Court.
    They may be dlsohor&ed by the Tax Assessor-Colleotor,
    lut  not by the Com3&vsloners* Court.
    In answer to your quest&s,   you are respect-'
    fully advised that it 1s the opinion of this departzient
    that there are no such offices atie?representatlvesof the
    Comzlssloners* CourtH; that the Coznlssicners* Court
    has no authority to employ ciameeither as Wrepresentstlves
    of the Coavlssloncrs* Court" or as "deputies of tho Tax
    Assessor-COlleotorW, regardless of whether such purported
    representatives of the CommloslGners* Court take an oath
    of off100 or not.
    You arc further respeotfully advised thet It la
    the opinion   of this departslentthat the Tax Assessor-
    Collector of EJuecesCounty, Texas, may apply to the
    Coinmissioners*Court for authority to appoint dcputlos,
    statIn the number he de3irea to appoint, the positions
    tG~he'~flllad,and the anou,ntto be paid each, which shall
    be presented in his svorn applloatlon to sold Covn&sloners*
    CGUrt,  cs outlined in Article 8902, Revised Civil Statutes
    of Texas. The 3alary of the first assistant Gr ohlef
    deputy shall not exoeed $2.100.00 por annum and the salary
    of other deyutles, clerks or assistants shall not exceed
    $1,800.00, In your county, under Seation 3 of Artlole
    3902, Revfsed Civil Statute3 of Texas.
    You sre further respaotrully advlsod that it
    1s the opinion of this dcpartmtlhtthat the marinum solary
    a lecal deputy Tax Assessor-CoLIeotor, other than the
    flr3t aaslstant or ohlef deputy, may reoelve in one year
    in &,800.00.   There is no provlslon made la the statutes
    for WovertiOe pay or salary".
    Honorable C..J. Wilde, Paea 5
    Trusting that this sntlsfaotorl:yanswers y&r
    quofitlons,
    ue are
    Yours very truly
    ATTOSfsiPG'"?.RJ.L
    OF TZXAS
    I%. J. Fannlug
    Assistant
    APPROVEDAUG 12, 19%
    &u.u
    4lTORKEYGENEFU OF 'I%%@
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-1175

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017