Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1939 )


Menu:
  •                    OFFICE   OF THE ATTORNEY     GENERAL    OF TEXAS
    AUSTIN
    GERALD C. MANN
    .,-on*” ..“8mAL
    January c,   1~3~
    iion.J. 0. Looney
    County Auditor, bowie Gouhty
    Boaton, 'kexes
    uear Mr. Looney:
    cry warrants ror
    uht tnah speciriea
    Your letter                        essea to rorrnerAttor-
    ney lieneralWllliaQ                          rea to the writer by Attor-
    ney cieneraluerald
    8 (iouhtyAuditor you
    would nave eutho                         y varrents ror any mount more
    oudget, lr the new Gouhty
    prove a 13~ reduction of sale-
    writer you nad in mind aectioh
    or the Forty-second Legislature
    reads a8 rollows:
    et has been finally approved
    therewith, and no expenditure ox the runds or
    the- county sna.~ltnerearter be made except in strict
    compliance with the cudget as adopted by the Gourt.
    Except met emergency expenaitures, in case or grave
    public necessity, to meet unusual and unforeseen
    .
    .   -
    Hon. J.   U.   ~oonay,   J snuary   6, 19.iY,Page 2
    conaltions wdich OUU~U not by reasonably diligent
    thought and attention, have been included in the
    original budget, may from time to time be authori-
    zed by the iourt as amendments to the original bud-
    get. In all cases where such amendments to the orig-
    inal budget is made, a copy of the order of the Court
    amending the budget shall be filed with the Clerk of
    the County Court, and attached to the budget originally
    adopted.*
    Also, you doubtlees considered your res_ponsibilityas
    County Auditor under the provisions of Art. 1666, R.C.S. 1925.
    I direct your attention to Section 20-e of said section
    12 of the General Laws of 
    1931, supra
    ;:
    "Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed
    as precluding the Legislature from making changes in the
    budget for State purposes or prevent the County Commis-
    sioners' Court from making changes in the budget for
    county purposes or prevent the governing body of any
    incorporated city or town from making changes in the bud-
    get for city purposes, or prevent the trustees or other
    school governing body from making changes in the budget
    for school purposes; and the duties required by virtue
    of this Act of State, County, City, and School Officers
    or Representatives shall be performed for the ccmpensa-
    tion now provided by law to be paid said officersrespect-
    ively."
    It has also been..heldby the Courts where the Commissioners*
    Court has power to fix the compensation of an officer, it may change
    the amount at any time, even during his term of office. See 34 Tex.
    Jur 527 and cases cited.
    You are accordingly advised that if the new Commissioners'
    Court properly passes orders changing the salaries of County Officers
    and their deputies, keeping within the statutory limits, it is our
    opinion you should approve the salary warrants; this despite the bud-
    get provisions fixed by the Court.
    Trusting the above satisfactori~lyanswers your inquiry, I am
    Yours respectfully
    (S) aenjemin bioouall
    HY
    APL'KUVU:                                                  aenjaininvvoodall
    \cijuA    c. MANN                                                 Assistant
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXA5
    F3W:Bi
    

Document Info

Docket Number: O-7

Judges: Gerald Mann

Filed Date: 7/2/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017