Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    September 6, 2016
    The Honorable Jim Murphy                                     Opinion No. KP-0112
    Chair, Committee on Corrections
    Texas House of Representatives                               Re: Whether the State is required to assume
    Post Office Box 2910                                         liability when a local retirement system
    Austin, Texas 78768-2910                                     created pursuant to title 109 of the Texas Civil
    Statutes is unable to meet its financial
    obligations (RQ-0101-KP)
    Dear Representative Murphy:
    You ask whether the State of Texas must assume liability in the event that a specific group
    of municipal retirement systems created pursuant to title 109 of the Texas Civil Statutes cannot
    meet its financial obligations. 1 You explain that "[r]ising pension and health care costs,
    unpredictable revenues, aging infrastructure, high debt load, and increasing costs for the delivery
    of city services threaten municipalities' ability to balance budgets and maintain strong credit
    ratings." Request Letter at 1. Citing the potential for municipal default, you ask whether "the
    oversight role played by the State Legislature in these specific municipal retirement systems
    cause[s] the State to assume some or all of the liability[.]" Id
    Article XVI, section 67(a) of the Texas Constitution authorizes the Legislature to "enact
    general laws establishing systems and programs of retirement and related disability and deatli
    benefits for public employees and officers." TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 67(a). With regard to
    municipalities, the constitution requires the Legislature to provide "by law for ... the creation by
    any city ... of a system of benefits for its officers and employees." 2 Id art. XVI,§ 67(c)(l)(A).
    Pursuant to this authority, the Legislatur~ enacted multiple articles in title 109 of the Texas Civil
    1
    See Letter and Attachment from Honorable Jim Murphy, Chair, Comm. on Corrections, Tex. House of
    Representatives, to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at I (Mar. 8, 2016), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.
    gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs ("Request Letter" & "Attachment" respectively) (Attachment on file with the
    Op. Comm.).
    2
    Article XVI, section 67(c)(l)(C) also requires the Legislature to provide for a statewide system "in which
    cities may voluntarily participate." TEX. CONST. art. XVI§ 67(c)(l)(C). Based on the information you provide, we
    assume that none of the cities at issue have elected to participate in the statewide system, the Texas Municipal
    Retirement System ("TMRS"). See generally TEX. Gov'T CODE §§ 851.001-855.608 (subtitle G", establishing
    TMRS).
    The Honorable Jim Murphy - Page 2                        (KP-0112)
    Statutes to establish the specific municipal retirement systems you ask about. 3 Through each
    system's enabling statute, the Legislature provided the governance provisions applicable to each
    system, including board composition, plan structure, retirement eligibility requirements, benefits,
    and pension fund contributions. The Legislature also made public retirement systems generally
    subject to Chapter 802 of the Government Code, which sets forth administrative requirements in
    subchapter C regarding, among other things, the administration of assets. 4 See generally TEX.
    Gov'T CODE§§ 802.201-.207. In accordance with the constitution and chapter 802, the trustees
    of the municipal retirement systems at issue must "hold the assets of the system or program for the
    exclusive purposes of providing benefits to participants and their beneficiaries and defraying
    reasonable expenses of administering the system or program." TEX. CONST. art. XVI,
    § 67(f)(2) (applicable to retirement systems not belonging to a statewide system); TEX. Gov'T
    CODE§ 802.201 (similarly providing that a public retirement system's assets are held in trust "for
    the benefit of the members and retirees of the system and their beneficiaries").
    In addition, the Legislature provided general oversight of municipal retirement systems
    created pursuant to title 109 through the State Pension Review Board (the "Board"). See generally
    TEX. Gov'T CODE §§ 801.001-.211. The Board must "conduct a continuing review of public
    retirement systems, compiling and comparing information about benefits, creditable service,
    financing, and administration of systems," including "intensive studies of potential or existing
    problems that threaten the actuarial soundness of or inhibit an equitable distribution of benefits."
    Id § 801.202(1)-(2). The Board recommends "policies, practices, and legislation" and, if
    requested by a public retirement system, provides "information and technical assistance on pension
    planning." Id § 801.202(3)-(4 ). Thus, through title 109 of the Civil Statutes and chapters 801
    and 802 of the Government Code, the Legislature provided an overall operating framework for
    each municipal retirement system about which you ask.
    Within this framework, the Legislature specifically addressed the financial health of the
    municipal retirement systems. For example, the Legislature required the Board to "conduct a study
    of the financial health of public retirement systems in this state, including each system's ability to
    meet its long-term obligations." Act of May 13, 2013, 83d Leg., R.S., ch. 140, § 7(b), 2013 Tex.
    Gen. Laws 566, 568. If at any time an actuarial valuation indicates "that the system's actual
    contributions are not sufficient to amortize the unfunded actuarial accrued liability within 40
    years," a public retirement system must generally notify the associated governmental entity in
    writing. TEX. Gov'T CODE § 802.2015(c). If the valuation shows that the amortization period
    3
    You identify the municipal retirement systems specifically enacted by title 109. See Attachment at 13-15,
    17, 19-21, 23-26, 28-29 (pagination as indicated therein) (identifying Austin Employees' Retirement System, Austin
    Fire Fighters Relief & Retirement Fund, Austin Police Retirement System, Dallas Police & Fire Pension System,
    El Paso Firemen Pension Fund, El Paso Police Pension Fund, Fort Worth Employees' Retirement Fund, Galveston
    Employees' Retirement Plan for Police, Houston Firefighters' Relief & Retirement Fund, Houston Municipal
    Employees Pension System, Houston Police Officers Pension System, San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund, and
    Texas Local Fire Fighters Retirement Act); see also TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. arts. 6243a-1, 6243b, 6243e, 6243e.1,
    6243e.2(1), 6243g-4, 6243h, 6243i, 6243n, 6243n-1, 62430, 6243p.
    4
    Subchapter C of chapter 802, Government Code, does not apply to the Texas Local Fire Fighters Retirement
    Act except for sections 802.202 (Investment of Surplus), 802.205 (Investment Custody Account), and 802.207
    (Custody and Use of Funds). TEX. REV. CIV. STAT. art. 6243e, § 28(h).
    The Honorable Jim Murphy - Page 3                           (KP-0112)
    "has exceeded 40 years" for a certain number of consecutive valuations, the retirement system and
    the associated governmental entity must generally "formulate a funding soundness restoration
    plan" meeting certain requirements in accordance with the system's governing statute and report
    the progress toward improved actuarial soundness to the Board. 
    Id. § 802.2015(c),
    (e), (f).
    With regard to specific enabling statutes of the municipal retirement systems at issue, the
    Legislature in some instances authorized or directed specific action by local entities under certain
    financial circumstances. See, e.g., TEX. REV. C1v. STAT. art. 6243h, § 21(a), (c) (Houston
    Municipal Employees Pension System) (authorizing the pension board to temporarily reduce
    benefits if it "determines that the pension fund is seriously depleted," and authorizing the
    governing body of the city by ordinance to dissolve and liquidate the pension system "[i]f the
    reserve and surplus in the pension fund become exhausted and the payouts of the pension fund
    exceed the income to the pension fund"). 5 In the event that a change by a municipal retirement
    system results in the reduction of benefits, article XVI, section 66( d)-( e) of the constitution
    generally protects the benefits of vested employees existing on the date of the change, putting the
    joint responsibility on "the political subdivision ... and the retirement system that finance benefits
    under the retirement system" to ensure that such benefits "are not reduced or otherwise impaired." 6
    TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 66(d)-(f); see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. GA-0615 (2008) at 7
    (indicating that the legislative intent of section 66 was to give affected retirement systems the
    "flexibility ... to respond to changing economic times" while protecting the benefits of vested
    employees (quotation marks omitted)).
    In no instance does the constitution or the Legislature make the State liable for any
    shortfalls of a municipal retirement system regarding the system's financial obligations under title
    109. The Texas Constitution would in fact prohibit the State from assuming such liability without
    express authorization. Article III, section 49(a) prohibits the creation of State debt except in
    5See also id.. arts. 6243e.l, § 9.08 (Austin Fire Fighters Relief and Retirement Fund) (requiring a temporary
    pro rata reduction of benefits ifthe fund is insufficient to make regular payments); 6243n-l, § 6.0l(d)(4) (Austin
    Police Retirement System) (giving the board "the authority and the duty" to decrease cost of living adjustments "as
    much as is necessary" to protect the continuity of the retirement system if "the ability of the system to continue"
    regular payments is compromised by an "economic situation"); 6243i, § 5.08(a) (Fort Worth Employees' Retirement
    Fund) (authorizing the city's governing body to amend its administrative rules governing municipal contributions
    under certain circumstances to address "a fiscal emergency"); 62430, § 4.06 (making the City of San Antonio
    responsible for paying "the deficiency, if any" between the amount available to pay benefits and the amount owed by
    statute).
    6 By its terms, article XVI, section 66 does not apply "to a public retirement system that provides service and
    disability retirement benefits and death benefits to firefighters and police officers employed by the City of
    San Antonio" and to a public retirement system and its financing political subdivision ifthe voters so elect pursuant
    to section 66(h). TEX. CONST. art. XVI,§ 66(b), (h). You inform us that voters of the following cities opted out of
    this provision: the City of Galveston (for the Galveston Employees' Retirement Plan for Police); the City of Houston
    (for the Houston Firefighters' Relief & Retirement Fund, the Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, and the
    Houston Police Officers Pension System); and the City of San Antonio (for the San Antonio Fire and Police Pension
    Fund). See Attachment at 22-26, 28 (pagination as indicated therein).
    The Honorable Jim Murphy - Page 4                           (KP-0112)
    limited circumstances not present here. 7 See TEX. CONST. art. III, § 49(a). A related provision,
    Article III, section 50, prohibits the State from lending its credit, stating that the Legislature has
    no power to give or to lend ... the credit of the State in aid of, or to
    any person, association or corporation, whether municipal or other,
    or to pledge the credit of the State in any manner whatsoever, for the
    payment of the liabilities, present or prospective, of any individual,
    association of individuals, municipal or other corporation
    whatsoever.
    
    Id. art. III,
    § 50. Thus, a court would likely conclude that the State is not required to assume
    liability when a municipal retirement system created under title 109 is unable to meet its financial
    obligations.
    7
    See TEX. CONST. art. III, § 49(a) (prohibiting the creation of State debt "except (1) to supply casual
    deficiencies of revenue, not to exceed in the aggregate at any one time two hundred thousand dollars; (2) to repel
    invasion, suppress insurrection, or defend the State in war; (3) as otherwise authorized by this constitution; or (4)" as
    approved by the voters through an election).
    The Honorable Jim Murphy - Page 5               (KP-0112)
    SUMMARY
    A court would likely conclude that the State is not required
    to assume liability when a municipal retirement system created
    under title 109 of the Texas Civil Statutes is unable to meet its
    financial obligations.
    Very truly yours,
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JEFFREY C. MATEER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    BECKY P. CASARES
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: KP-0112

Judges: Ken Paxton

Filed Date: 7/2/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/10/2017