Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                  KEN PAXTON
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    June 28, 2016
    The Honorable Dan Patrick                                   Opinion No. KP-0100
    Lieutenant Governor of Texas
    Post Office Box 12068                                       Re: Whether the ·Fort Worth Independent
    Austin, Texas 78711-2068                                    School District transgender guidelines violate
    chapter 26 of the Education Code and whether
    the superintendent had authority to adopt the
    guidelines without a vote by the school board or
    public comment (RQ-0107-KP)
    Dear Governor Patrick:
    You ask whether the "Transgender Guidelines" adopted by the Fort Worth Independent
    School District ("FWISD") superintendent violate chapter 26 of the Education Code and whether
    the superintendent had authority to adopt them without adoption by a school board vote and
    without public comment. 1 As background, the superintendent adopted the Transgender Student
    Guidelines in April of this year with the stated purpose of providing "direction for personnel to
    address issues that may arise concerning the needs of and challenges facing trans gender students. " 2
    The Guidelines state that they "are mandatory for the 2015-2016 school year," and failure to
    comply with them "may result in adverse employment action." Guidelines at 1. District staff
    developed the Guidelines, and they were approved by the FWISD superintendent. 3 You explain
    that this was done "without adoption by school board vote and without public comment from
    parents and citizens." Request Letter at 1.                                                           '
    You first ask whether these Guidelines violate chapter 26 of the Education Code in their
    "effort to keep student· information from parents." 
    Id. The answer
    to your question hinges on a
    proper understanding of the framework 9f parental rights as they relate to public education. As
    the United States Supreme Court has explained repeatedly since 1923, parents have the
    1See Letter from Honorable Dan Patrick, Lt. Gov., to Honorable Ken Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 1 (May 31,
    2016) ("Request Letter"), https://www.texasattomeygeneral.gov/opinion/requests-for-opinion-rqs.
    2   Fort Worth ISO Transgender Student Guidelines at 2 ("Guidelines") (attached to Request Letter).
    3See   Guidelines Approval Form (attached to Request Letter).
    The Honorable Dan Patrick - Page 2                        (KP-0100)
    fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody and control of their child. 4 To
    implement this guiding principle in the context of public education, the Legislature has imposed a
    delicate balance of the parents' fundamental right to direct the upbringing of their child with the
    public school official's need to direct the education of children in Chapter 26 of the Education
    Code, titled "Parental Rights and Responsibilities." See TEX. EDUC. CODE §§ 26.001-.013. In
    adopting that chapter, the Legislature emphasized that "[p]arents are partners with educators,
    administrators, and school district boards of trustees in their children's education. Parents shall be
    encouraged to actively participate in creating and implementing educational programs for their
    children." 
    Id. § 26.00l(a).
    Chapter 26 also provides that "[u]nless otherwise provided by law, a
    board of trustees, administrator, educator, or other person may not limit parental rights." 
    Id. § 26.00l(c).
    With regard to student records, "[a] parent is entitled to access to all written records
    of a school district concerning the parent's child." 
    Id. § 26.004.
    5 In addition, a "parent is entitled
    to full information regarding the school activities of a parent's child except as provided by Section
    38.004." 
    Id. § 26.008(a).
    "An attempt by any school district employee to encourage or coerce a
    child to withhold information from the child's parent is grounds for discipline." 
    Id. § 26.008(b
    ). 6
    Multiple provisions in the Guidelines relate to parental access to information about
    transgender students. Under the title "Privacy and Confidentiality," the Guidelines state:
    All students have a right to privacy. This includes keeping
    a student's actual or perceived gender identity and expression
    private. School personnel may only share this information on a
    need-to-know basis or as the student directs. This includes sharing
    information with the student's parent or guardian. When contacting
    the parent or guardian or a transgender student, school personnel
    must use the student's legal name and the pronoun corresponding to
    4
    See, e.g., Troxel v. Granville, 
    530 U.S. 57
    , 65 (2000) (observing that "the interest of parents in the care,
    custody, and control of their children[ ]is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this
    Court"); Santosfy v. Kramer, 
    455 U.S. 745
    , 753 (1982) (recognizing the "fundamental liberty interest of natural
    parents in the care, custody, and management of their child"); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 
    406 U.S. 205
    , 232 (1972) ("The
    history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and upbringing
    of their children. This primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate
    as an enduring American tradition."); Prince v. Massachusetts, 
    321 U.S. 158
    , 166 ( 1944) ("It is cardinal with us that
    the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include
    preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder."); Pierce v. Society ofSisters, 
    268 U.S. 510
    , 534-
    35 (1925) (holding that the parents have the right "to direct the upbringing and education of children under their
    control"); Meyer v. Nebraska, 
    262 U.S. 390
    , 399, 401 (1923) (holding that parents have a right to "establish a home
    and bring up children" and "to control the education of their own").
    5
    Section 38.004 requires the Texas Education Agency to adopt a policy governing the reports of child abuse
    or neglect, and it "must provide for cooperation with law enforcement child abuse investigations without the.consent
    of the child's parents if necessary." TEX. EDUC. CODE§ 38.004(a).
    6
    Although you ask only about chapter 26 of the Education Code, the federal Family Educational Rights and
    Privacy Act ("FERPA") likewise generally grants parents "the right to inspect and review the education records of
    their children." 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(a)(l)(A).
    The Honorable Dan Patrick - Page 3                      (KP-0100)
    the student's gender assigned at birth unless the student, parent, or
    guardian has specified otherwise.
    If a parent or guardian requests access to his/her student's
    educational records as defined by FERP A, access must be pro.vided.
    A request by a parent or guardian for educational records under
    FERPA may include unofficial records directly related to the
    student, including records containing a student's actual or perceived
    gender identity. The Office of Legal Counsel should be advised
    when a request for student records is made and a transgender
    student's privacy may be of concern (e.g. when the student has not
    yet disclosed gender identity status to a parent or guardian).
    FWISD Guidelines at 5 (emphasis added). The Guidelines also include a section titled "Student
    Transitions," wherein they provide:
    In most cases, transitioning is a very private matter. Students
    may choose whether or not to have their parents participate in this
    process ....
    Prior to notifying any parent or guardian regarding the
    student's gender identity or any potential transition process, school
    personnel must work closely with the student to assess the degree to
    which, if any, the parent or guardian has been or will be involved in
    the process.
    
    Id. at 6.
    Far from creating .a partnership between parents, educators, and administrators regarding
    their children's education, the Guidelines relegate parents to a subordinate status, receiving
    information only on a "need-to-know basis." Limiting parents' access to information in this way
    impairs their ability to "actively participate" in the children's education, contrary to state law. See
    TEX. EDUC. CODE § 26.00I(a). Furthermore, the provision requiring school personnel to "work
    closely with the student" to determine to what extent, if any, a parent will be involved in the
    student's transitioning suggests that employees could, pursuant to these restrictions, encourage
    some children to withhold information from a parent. See Guidelines at 6. Such action is both
    against state law and grounds for discipline under the Education Code. See TEX. EDUC. CODE
    §§ 26.00I(c), 26.008(a)-(b). Thus, to the extent that the Guidelines limit parental access to
    information about a parent's child and operate to encourage students to withhold information from
    their parents, they violate chapter 26 of the Education Code. 7
    7
    In briefing submitted to this office, FWISD argues that "there are times when the law precludes sharing of
    private information." See Letter from Valerie Carrillo, Gen. Counsel, Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist., to Honorable Ken
    The Honorable Dan Patrick - Page 4                       (KP-0100)
    You also ask whether the FWISD superintendent had "the authority to unilaterally adopt
    this policy without adoption by school board vote and without public comment." Request Letter
    at 1. Chapter 11 of the Education Code establishes requirements for school district organization
    and governance in Texas public schools. See TEX. EDUC. CODE§§ 11.001-.356. School districts
    are governed by boards of trustees who "oversee the management of the district" and "ensure that
    the superintendent implements and monitors plans, procedures, programs, and systems to achieve
    appropriate, clearly defined, and desired results in the major areas of district operations." 
    Id. § 1
    l.051(a). Addressing the collaboration between the board of trustees and the superintendent,
    subsection 1 l.1512(a) provides that the "superintendent shall, on a day-to-day basis, ensure the
    implementation of the policies created by the board." Id.§ 1 l.1512(a). Furthermore, the "board
    of trustees and the superintendent shall work together to ... establish district-wide policies ...."
    
    Id. § l
    1.1512(b)(4). Section 11.201 separately outlines the duties of the superintendent, which
    include, among others:
    (1) assuming administrative responsibility and leadership for the
    planning, organization, operation, supervision, and evaluation of the
    education programs, services, and facilities of the district ... ;
    (5) managing the day-to-day operations of the district as its
    administrative manager, including implementing and monitoring
    plans, procedures, programs, and systems to achieve clearly defined
    and desired results in major areas of district operations; ...
    (7) preparing recommendations for policies to be adopted by the
    board of trustees and overseeing the implementation of adopted
    policies; [and]
    (8) developing or causing to be developed appropriate
    administrative regulations to implement policies established by the
    board of trustees[.]
    Paxton, Tex. Att'y Gen. at 1 (June 14, 2016) ("FWISD Brief"). FWISD points to section 38.004 of the Education
    Code, which requires school districts to cooperate with law enforcement child abuse investigations without the consent
    of the child's parents if necessary, and chapter 32 of the Family Code, which enumerates specific situations when a
    child may consent to treatment of counseling without parental consent. See FWISD Brief at 1-2; TEX. EDUC. CODE
    § 38.004(a); TEX. FAM. CODE §§ 32.001-.005. This office has recognized that in "very narrow and unusual
    circumstances," state law may authorize a school to withhold some information from a parent; and FWISD explains
    in its briefing that "[a]bsent such circumstances, District personnel involve parents in all student matters, including
    gender identity issues." FWISD Briefat 2; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. JC-0538 (2002) at 7-8 (explaining that
    a school may withhold a minor child's cbunseling records from a parent in very limited and specific circumstances
    when the child's health or safety is a concern). However, the Guidelines do not currently specify that these are the
    only circumstances when parental access to information should be limited and instead appear to more broadly restrict
    parental access to information, in violation of state law. In briefing, FWISD explains that "it intends to clarify" this
    portion of the regulations in the future. FWISD Briefat 2.
    The Honorable Dan Patrick - Page 5                       (KP-0100)
    
    Id. § 1
    1.201 (d). When viewed as a whole, chapter 11 thus gives superintendents authority over
    the day-to-day management of the district, but it requires that boards of trustees adopt general
    policies for the district. Superintendents then implement those policies through the development
    of administrative regulations.
    FWISD explains that it adopted the Guidelines "as an administrative regulation aimed at
    appropriately implementing Board Policy FFH (LOCAL)." FWISD Brief at 2. FWISD Board
    Policy FFH "prohibits discrimination, including harassment, against any student on the basis of
    ... gender identity and expression," in addition to other potential bases of discrimination. 8 The
    policy defines discrimination and harassment, provides examples of how those may occur, outlines
    reporting and investigation procedures, and describes corrective actions that may be used. Policy
    FFH at 1-8. However, nowhere in Policy FFH has the board of trustees adopted a policy limiting
    a parent's involvement or access to information regarding a student's gender identity, and, as
    discussed above, doing so would have likely violated state law. Instead, the few references to
    "parent" in Policy FFH require notice to parents and allow for their involvement concerning a
    student who has faced harassment or discrimination. See id at 5, 7 ("The District official or
    designee shall promptly notify the parents of any student alleged to have experienced prohibited
    conduct by a District employee or another adult."). While the superintendent has characterized
    these regulations as Guidelines that "are in alignment with Board Policy FFH (Local)," decisions
    to withhold information from a parent regarding a student's gender identity or suggest that
    employees might work with a student to restrict parental involvement are in fact significant and
    controversial matters of policy that do not appear to have been previously addressed by the FWISD
    board oftrustees. 9 See Stedman v. Georgetown Savs. & Loan Ass 'n, 
    595 S.W.2d 486
    , 489 (Tex.
    1979) (explaining that courts look behind labels and to determine the actual substance of action
    taken). While a superintendent is authorized to recommend policies to be adopted by the board,
    chapter 11 requires that policy decisions, like those addressing parental involvement with students'
    gender identity choices, be addressed by the board of trustees prior to the development of any
    related administrative regulations. 10 See TEX. EDUC. CODE § 11.201 (d)(7) (authorizing the
    superintendent to prepare "recommendations for policies to be adopted by the board of trustees
    and overseeing the implementation of adopted policies").
    8See Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. Bd. Policy FFH (LOCAL), available at http://pol.tasb.org/Policy/
    Download/110 I ?filename=FFH%28LOCAL%29.pdf ("Policy FFH").
    9
    Guidelines Approval Form (attached to Request Letter).
    10  The FWISD board of trustees would be required to conduct deliberations and make decisions about such
    policies at an open meeting to which the public has access. See TEX. Gov'T CODE §§ 551.002 (requiring open
    meetings for governmental bodies), .001(3)(E) (defining "governmental body" to include "a school district board of
    trustees"), .00 I (5) (defining "open" to mean "open to the public).
    The Honorable Dan Patrick - Page 6              (KP-0100)
    SUMMARY
    Chapter 26 of the Education Code provides that parents must
    have access to all written records of a school district concerning their
    child, as well as full information regarding the child's school
    activities. Attempts to encourage a child to withhold information
    from his or her parents may be grounds for discipline. To the extent
    that the Transgender Student Guidelines adopted by the Fort Worth
    Independent School District superintendent limit parental access to
    information about their child and operate to encourage students to
    withhold information from parents contrary to the provisions in
    chapter 26, they violate state law.
    Chapter 11 of the Education Code requires that boards of
    trustees adopt policies for the district, while superintendents
    implement those policies by developing administrative regulations.
    While a superintendent is authorized to recommend policies to be
    adopted by the board, chapter 11 requires that policy decisions, like
    those addressing parental involvement with students' gender
    identity choices, be addressed by the board of trustees prior to the
    development of any related administrative regulations.
    Very truly yours,
    KEN PAXTON
    Attorney General of Texas
    JEFFREY C. MATEER
    First Assistant Attorney General
    BRANTLEY STARR
    Deputy First Assistant Attorney General
    VIRGINIA K. HOELSCHER
    Chair, Opinion Committee