Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                               ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG       ABBOTT
    July 30,2004
    The Honorable Jose R. Rodriguez                     Opinion No. GA-0224
    El Paso County Attorney
    500 East San Antonio, Room 503                      Re: Whether a member of the board of directors of
    El Paso, Texas 79901                                a water improvement district may simultaneously
    serve as a school district trustee (RQ-0174-GA)
    Dear Mr. Rodriguez:
    You ask whether a member of the board of directors of a water improvement                district may
    simultaneously serve as a school district trustee.’
    You indicate that the individual in question is a member of the board of directors of the
    Tornillo Water Improvement District (TWID), which was created in 1987 pursuant to article XVI,
    section 59, of the Texas Constitution and chapters 49 and 54 of the Water Code. See Request Letter,
    supra note 1, at 1. A district created under chapter 49 of the Water Code is authorized to “levy and
    collect a tax for operation and maintenance purposes.”        TEX. WATER CODE ANN. $ 49.107(a)
    (Vernon Supp. 2004). Thus, TWID has the power of taxation within its geographical jurisdiction.
    You further state that in May 2003, the individual “was elected to and subsequently accepted
    the office of trustee” of the Tomillo Independent School District (TISD). Request Letter, supra note
    1, at 1. A school district, like a water improvement district created under chapter 49 of the Water
    Code, also enjoys the power of taxation. See TEX. EDUC. CODEANN. 9 11.152 (Vernon 1996) (“[t]he
    trustees of an independent school district may levy and collect taxes”). You indicate that the
    geographical boundaries of TWID overlap with those of TISD. See Request Letter, supra note 1,
    at 1.
    Article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution prohibits an individual from holding more
    than one office of emolument.    See TEX. CONST. art. XVI, 0 40. A member of the TISD board of
    trustees does not hold an office of emolument because the office of school trustee is not a
    compensated position. See TEX. EDUC. CODE ANN. 9 11.06 1(d) (Vernon 1996) (“[t]he trustees [of
    a school district] serve without compensation”).    Thus, article XVI, section 40 is not a bar to the
    holding of the two offices under consideration here. Your concern is whether the common-law
    ‘See Letter from Honorable Jose R. Rodriguez, El Paso County Attorney, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Texas
    Attorney General (Jan. 20, 2004) (on file with Opinion Committee, also available at http://www.oag.state.tx.us)
    [hereinafterRequest Letter].
    The Honorable Jose R. Rodriguez      - Page 2       (GA-0224)
    doctrine of incompatibility   prohibits the individual   in question from simultaneously   holding both
    positions.
    The common-law doctrine of incompatibility has three aspects: self-appointment,       self-
    employment, and conflicting loyalties.      See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0032 (2003) at 4.
    Conflicting loyalties incompatibility was first recognized by a Texas court in Thomas v. Abernathy
    County Line Independent School District, 
    290 S.W. 152
    (Tex. Comm’n App. 1927, judgm’t
    adopted), in which the court declared:
    In our opinion the offices of school trustee and alderman are
    incompatible; for under our system there are in the city council or
    board of aldermen various directory or supervisory powers exertable
    in respect to school property located within the city or town and in
    respect to the duties of school trustee performable within its
    limits-e.g., there might well arise a conflict of discretion or duty in
    respect to health, quarantine, sanitary, and firepreventionregulations.
    If the same person could be a school trustee and a member of the city
    council or board of aldermen at the same time, school policies, in
    many important respects, would be subject to direction of the council
    or aldermen instead of to that of the trustees.
    Thomas v. 
    Abernathy, 290 S.W. at 153
    (citations omitted).
    As you note, the two entities under consideration, the TWID and the TISD, have overlapping
    geographical boundaries, and both have the power of taxation. In Attorney General Opinion
    GA-0032, we said, quoting two prior attorney general opinions, that “‘[i]f two districts with
    overlapping geographical jurisdictions each have the power of taxation, . . . the potential for
    conflict is insurmountable.“’    Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. GA-0032 (2003) at 5 (citations omitted).
    Furthermore,     “‘[wlhere  the object  of each district is to maximize its own revenues, a single
    individual would have great difficulty in exercising his duties to two separate and competing
    masters.“’ 
    Id. Opinion GA-0032
    found that, as a result, “an individual may not simultaneously serve
    both as trustee of the San Jacinto College District and as director of the Clear Brook Municipal
    Utility District.” 
    Id. Similar reasoning
    is applicable to the situation you describe here. As a result, an individual
    may not simultaneously serve as a trustee of the TISD and a member of the board of directors of the
    TWlD.
    You also ask whether, if the person in question is barred by the common-law doctrine of
    incompatibility from serving in both positions, he automatically resigned his position on the TWID
    board when he was elected to and qualified for the office of school trustee. See Request Letter,
    supra note 1, at 2-3. Ln Attorney General Opinion JC-0363, this office considered whether an
    individual who was a member of the board of directors of the Wilson County Memorial Hospital
    District automatically resigned that position when he was elected to and assumed the office of mayor
    The Honorable Jose R. Rodriguez    - Page 3      (GA-0224)
    of La Vemia. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0363 (2001) at 1. Citing the principle established by
    the Texas Supreme Court in Pruitt v. Glen Rose Independent School District, 84 S.W.2d 1004,1006
    (Tex. 1935), that qualification for and acceptance of a second office operates as an automatic
    resignation from the first, Opinion JC-0363 concluded that the person in question resigned from the
    office of director of the Wilson County Memorial Hospital District when he assumed the office of
    mayor. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0363 (2001) at 2-3. Likewise, in the situation you pose, the
    individual automatically resigned his office as amember of the board of directors of the TWID when
    he was elected to and assumed the position of a trustee of the TISD.
    The Honorable Jose R. Rodriguez    - Page 4       (GA-0224)
    SUMMARY
    An individual may not simultaneously serve as a member of
    the board of directors of a water improvement district created under
    chapter 49 of the Water Code and as a trustee of an independent
    school district when the two districts have overlapping geographical
    boundaries. A member of the board of directors of the Tomillo Water
    Improvement District automatically resigned his position when he
    was elected to and qualified for the position of a trustee of the
    Tomillo Independent School District.
    Very truly yours,
    G ABBOTT
    Attorney General of Texas
    BARRY R. MCBEE
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DON R. WILLETT
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    NANCY S. FULLER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Rick Gilpin
    Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-0224

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017