Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                                   ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
    GREG        ABBOTT
    February 12,2004
    The Honorable Fred Hill                                      Opinion No. GA-O 148
    Chair, Committee on Local Government
    Ways and Means                                             Re:     Whether recent amendments    to section
    Texas House of Representatives                               11.13(Z) of the Tax Code may be applied to
    P.O. Box 2910                                                restrict homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax
    Austin, Texas 78768-29 10                                    year (RQ-0104-GA)
    Dear Representative       Hill:
    You ask whether amendments to section 11.13(Z) of the Tax Code enacted by the Seventy-
    eighth Legislature in House Bill 1223, see Act of May 28,2003,78th Leg., R.S., ch. 240,§ 1,2003
    Tex. Gen. Laws 1 100, 1 100, may be applied to restrict homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year.’
    Section 11.13 of the Tax Code provides homeowners with various tax exemptions on the
    value of their residence homesteads. See TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 3 11.13(a)-(d), (n)-(q) (Vernon Supp.
    2004); see also TEX. CONST. art. VIII, 9 l-b (authorizing residence homestead exemptions); TEX.
    TAX CODE ANN. 8 11.13(j)(l) (V emon Supp. 2004) (defining “residence homestead”); Tex. Att’y
    Gen. Op. No. JC-0415 (2001) at 4-5 (“principal residence” means primary residence that owner
    occupies on a regular basis). Before the House Bill 1223 amendments took effect, section 11.13(Z)
    provided that a homestead exemption was not lost when an owner temporarily stopped occupying
    the home as his or her principal residence if the owner did not establish a different principal
    residence and intended to return.* Section 11.13(Z), as amended by House Bill 1223, now imposes
    specific time limits for a temporary absence. An owner who temporarily stops occupying his or her
    principal residence is entitled to a homestead exemption only if the owner does not establish a
    different principal residence and the absence is:
    ‘Letter from Honorable Fred Hill, Chair, Committee on Local Government Ways and Means, Texas House of
    Representatives, to Honorable Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General (Sept. 11,2003) (on file with Opinion Committee)
    [hereinafter Request Letter].
    2Prior to amendment, section 11.13(Z) read in its entirety, “A qualified residential structure does not lose its
    character as a residence homestead when the owner who qualifies for the exemption temporarily stops occupying it as
    a principal residence if that owner does not establish a different principal residence and intends to return and occupy the
    structure as his principal residence.” Act of May 26, 1979,66th Leg., R.S., ch. 84 1, 0 1, 1979 Tex. Gen. Laws 22 17,
    2236(enacting Tax Code section 11.13(r)).
    The Honorable Fred Hill - Page 2                     (GA-0148)
    (1) for a period of less than two years and the owner intends to return and
    occupy the structure as the owner’s principal residence; or
    (2) caused by the owner’s:
    (A) military service outside of the United States as a member
    of the armed forces of the United States or of this state; or
    (B) residency in a facility that provides         services related to
    health, infirmity, or aging.
    TEX.TAXCODEANN.§         ll.l3(Z)(V emon Supp. 2004). In short, to qualify as temporarily absent, an
    owner may not be absent for two years or more unless he or she is on active military duty outside the
    United States or is confined in an institution such as a nursing home or hospital.
    House Bill 1223, having received the required two-thirds vote, became effective immediately
    upon signature on June 18,2003. See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1; Act of May 28,2003,§ 2,
    2003 Tex. Gen. Laws at 1100. The question has arisen, however, whether its restriction on
    temporary absences applies to homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year. See Request Letter,
    supra note 1, at 1.
    As we understand the situation giving rise to your request, at least one tax appraisal district
    has taken the view that this restriction does apply to homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year.3
    The bill’s author describes this as a “retrospective application of the changes [H.B. 1223 ] made to
    the Property Tax Code,” Madden Letter, supra note 3, and you ask whether applying the changes for
    the 2003 tax year is legitimate, see Request Letter, supra note 1, at 1.
    Generally speaking, the status of property for the purpose of qualifying for tax exemptions
    is set on January 1 of the year in question. Section 11.42(a) of the Tax Code provides that, with
    limited exceptions not relevant to your question, “eligibility for and amount of an exemption
    authorized by this chapter for any tax year are determined by a claimant’s qualifications on January
    1.” TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 9 11.42(a) (Vernon Supp. 2004).
    Applying the two-year restriction on temporary absence imposed by House Bill 1223 for the
    2003 tax year would, as Representative Madden suggests, be retrospective.      See Madden Letter,
    supra note 3. As of January 1,2003, no such restriction formed part of the statute. In order to be
    eligible for a homestead exemption under the law as it existed on January 1 of the 2003 tax year, it
    was necessary only for the homeowner to have established no other permanent residence and to
    intend to return to the homestead. See Act of May 26, 1979, 5 1, 1979 Tex. Gen. Laws at 2236
    (enacting Tax Code section 11.13(Z)).
    ‘See Letter from Honorable Jerry A. Madden, Texas House of Representatives, to Honorable Fred Hill, Chair,
    Committee on Local Government Ways and Means, Texas House of Representatives (Sept. 11,2003) (attachment to
    Request Letter) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Madden Letter].
    The Honorable Fred Hill - Page 3               (GA-0148)
    As a rule, retrospective application of statutes requires that such statutes expressly provide
    that they shall be retrospective.   Section 3 11.022 of the Government Code states, “A statute is
    presumed to be prospective in its operation unless expressly made retrospective.” TEX. GOV’T CODE
    ANN. 0 3 11.022 (Vernon 1998). Nothing in the language of House Bill 1223 makes it retrospectively
    applicable to the 2003 tax year. See Act of May 28, 2003, $ 1, 2003 Tex. Gen. Laws at 1100.
    Accordingly, exemptions for that year are governed, pursuant to section 11.42(a) of the Tax Code,
    by “a claimant’s qualifications on January 1” of that year. TEX. TAX CODE ANN. 0 11.42(a) (Vernon
    Supp. 2004). Such qualification, as of the relevant date, was not affected by House Bill 1223’s two-
    year limitation on temporary absence from the homestead.
    The Honorable Fred Hill - Page 4             (GA-0148)
    SUMMARY
    Amendments to section 11.13(Z) of the Tax Code adopted
    pursuant to House Bill 1223, Seventy-eighth Legislature, Regular
    Session do not apply to homestead exemptions for the 2003 tax year.
    Yoursyery   truly,
    /     GRE
    Attom
    BARRY R. MCBEE
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DON R. WILLETT
    Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
    NANCY S. FULLER
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: GA-0148

Judges: Greg Abbott

Filed Date: 7/2/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017