Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •      OFFltE OF THEATTORNEY
    GENERAL.STATEOF nx*s
    JOHN     CORNYN
    October 3,200O
    The Honorable     Homer0 Ramirez                       Opinion No. JC-0287
    Webb County      Attorney
    1110 Victoria,   Suite 403                            Re: Which county is responsible for mental
    Laredo, Texas     78040                               health services proceeding costs under section
    571 .018 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and
    related question (RQ-0227-JC)
    Dear Mr. Ramirez:
    You ask about the collection of mental health services proceeding costs under section
    571.018 ofthe Health and Safety Code. We understand you to ask which county is responsible for
    mental health services proceeding costs under section 571.018, and the costs for which it is
    responsible.    Because you do not ask about a particular situation, we answer your questions in
    general terms. The county that initiates emergency detention procedures or, if no such procedures
    are initiated, the county that accepts an application for court-ordered mental health services, issues
    an order for protective custody, or issues an order for temporary mental health services is generally
    responsible for paying mental health services proceeding costs under section 571.018.                A
    nonresponsible county conducting mental health services proceedings is authorized to collect the
    cost of those proceedings from the responsible county. A county’s responsibility for paying mental
    health services proceeding costs is not limited to actions that are “derivative” of the initial
    commitment proceeding. The costs ofmental health services proceedings payable by the responsible
    county include, but are not limited to, those enumerated in section 571.018(c).
    You inform us ofthe following facts giving rise to your request: San Antonio State Hospital
    (SASH) in Bexar County serves as the regional hospital providing inpatient care for various Texas
    counties, including Webb County. Bexar County, using its resources, conducts hearings for mental
    health services for patients committed to SASH by Webb County or patients admitted to SASH from
    Webb County under the emergency detention procedures as set out in subchapters A or B of chapter
    573 of the Health and Safety Code. Examples of such proceedings include petitions for an order to
    administer psychoactive medication, applications for a temporary mental health services order, and
    applications for extended mental health services. Bexar County sends Webb County bills of costs
    for these proceedings.    Webb County has not entered into any local intergovernmental    agreement
    with Bexar County agreeing to be responsible for these mental health services proceeding costs.’
    ‘Letter fromHonorable Homero Ramirez, Webb County Attorney, to Honorable John Comyn, Texas Attorney
    General at 2 (Apr. 28,200O) (on tile with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Request Letter].
    The Honorable Homer0 Ramirez           - Page 2       (X-0287)
    We understand you to ask, first, which county is responsible for mental health services
    proceeding costs under section 571.018 and, second, what are the costs for which it is responsible.
    See Request Letter, supra note 1, at 2-3; Webb Brief at 2-5$ Telephone Conversation with
    Honorable Homer0 Ramirez, Webb County Attorney (Aug. 3 1,200O).
    The Texas Mental Health Code, codified as subtitle C of title 7, Health and Safety Code,
    provides for access to care and treatment for mentally ill persons. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE
    ANN. chs. 571 - 577 (Vernon 1992 & Supp. 2000). Chapter 574 of the Health and Safety Code
    governs proceedings for court-ordered mental health services. A county or district attorney or other
    adult may tile an application for court-ordered mental health services for an individual.      See 
    id. 4 574.001
    (Vernon Supp. 2000). The application must be tiled with the county clerk in the county
    in which the proposed patient resides, is found, or is receiving mental health services by court order
    or pursuant to apprehension by a police officer under subchapter A of chapter 573 of the Health and
    Safety Code. See 
    id. 5 574.001(b).
    Section 571.018 of the Health and Safety Code deals with the mental health services
    proceeding costs, and subsection (a) of that section provides that they shall be paid by:
    (1)    the county that initiates emergency           detention
    procedures under Subchapter A or B, Chapter 573 [for temporary
    detention of a person believed to be mentally ill, where there is a
    substantial risk of serious harm to the person or others]; or
    (2)      ifno emergency detention procedures are initiated, the
    county that accepts an application for court-ordered mental health
    services, issues an order for protective custody, or issues an order for
    temporary mental health services.
    
    Id. 5 571.018(a)(l),
    (2). The county responsible for the mental health services proceeding costs
    under subsection (a) is responsible for paying the costs of all subsequent hearings or proceedings for
    that person until he or she is discharged. 
    Id. 5 571
    .018(b). A proposed patient’s county of residence,
    however, must pay certain court-approved expenses for an indigent patient if ordered by the court
    under section 574.010. 
    Id. $5 571.018(f)
    (Vernon Supp. 2000), 574.010 (Vernon 1992). A county
    is entitled to reimbursement for costs actually paid by the county from the patient or “a person or
    estate liable for the patient’s support in a department[al] mental health facility.” 
    Id. 5 571
    .018(d)
    (Vernon Supp. 2000).
    With this background, we turn to your first question regarding the county responsible for
    mental health services proceeding costs under section 571 ,018. The county that initiates emergency
    detention procedures or, if no such procedures are initiated, the county that accepts an application
    for court-ordered mental health services, issues an order for protective custody, or issues an order
    2Brieffrom HonorableHomero Ram&z, Webb County Attorney, to Honorable       John Comyn, Texas Attorney
    General (Apr. 28,200O) (on file with Opinion Committee) [hereinafter Webb Brief].
    The Honorable   Homer0 Ramirez      - Page 3      (X-0287)
    for temporary mental health services is generally responsible for paying for the costs of a mental
    healthservicesproceeding.    See-id. 4 571.018(a),(b). Responsibilityundersection     571.018(a)isnot
    based on residency. See 
    id. The responsible
    county may be, but is not necessarily, the proposed
    patient’s county ofresidence. See id.; 
    id. 5 574.001(b)
    (application for court-ordered mental health
    services must be filed in the county in which person resides, is found, or is receiving mental health
    services by court order or pursuant to apprehension by police officer). If ordered by a court,
    however, the county of the proposed patient’s residence is responsible for court-approved expenses
    incurred for psychiatric evaluation and expert testimony for an indigent person.                See 
    id. $5 571.018(f)
    (Vernon Supp. 2000), 574.010 (Vernon 1992).
    Which county is the responsible county will vary in each case and will depend upon how the
    case was initiated. Webb County would generally be the responsibIe county for mental health
    services proceeding costs if it initiated the emergency detention proceedings, accepted a court-
    ordered mental health services application, or issued an order for protective custody or temporary
    mental health services. Because responsibility for the mental health services proceedings will vary
    with the facts of each case, we cannot advise you, as a matter of law, whether Bexar County or Webb
    County is responsible for the costs of mental health services proceedings.or hearings conducted in
    Bexar County.
    Relying on Attorney General Opinion JC-0088 (1999), you appear to suggest that a county
    is responsible under section 571.018 only for “derivative proceedings” to the commitment
    proceedings initiated by or conducted in that county. Webb Brief, supra note 2, at 2-5. We disagree.
    Section 571.018 does not allocate responsibility based on the “derivative” or “original”
    nature of the mental health services hearings or proceedings.      Again, under section 571 ,018, the
    county that initiates emergency detention procedures or, if no such procedures are initiated, the
    county that accepts an application for court-ordered mental health services, issues an order for
    protective custody, or issues an order for temporary mental health services is responsible for mental
    health services proceeding costs; and that county is also responsible for the costs of all subsequent
    mental health services proceedings under subtitle C of title 7 of the Health and Safety Code until the
    person who is the subject of these proceedings is discharged. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN.
    5 571.018(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2000). Subtitle C oftitle 7 comprises chapters 571 through 577 of
    the Health and Safety Code. If no emergency detention proceedings are initiated, the county that
    conducts the hearing on the application for court-ordered mental health services for a person, see 
    id. $5 574.031,
    ,034, ,035, which we assume is ihe “commitment hearing” to which you refer, is
    responsible for the costs of all subsequent proceedings under these chapters for that person. That
    county would be responsible, for instance, for paying the costs of a hearing on a petition to
    administer psychoactive medication under section 574.106 of the Health and Safety Code.
    Attorney General Opinion JC-0088 is inapposite. Attorney General Opinion JC-0088 deals
    with whether a county clerk under the clerk’s statutory authority to assess a separate filing
    fee only for each “original action” is permitted to charge a separate fee for a section 574.106
    medication hearing. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0088 (1999) at 2; see also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op.
    No. DM-174 (1992) at 2 (“The fee collected by a county clerk for filing of an original action under
    The Honorable   Homer0 Ramirez      - Page 4      (Jc-0287)
    section 118.052 [of the Local Government Code] is intended to cover ‘all clerical duties in
    connection with an original action tiled in a county civil court.“‘). The opinion concludes that a
    section 574.106 medication hearing is not a derivative or ancillary proceeding to the initial
    involuntary mental health commitment action, but a separate original action for which the county
    clerk is permitted to charge an additional fee. See Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0088 (1999).
    Attorney General Opinion K-0088 does not speak to the mental health proceedings costs for which
    a county is responsible under section 571.018.
    You also appear to suggest that the nonresponsible county conducting the mental health
    services proceedings is not authorized to collect the costs of those proceedings from the responsible
    county in the absence of an agreement by the responsible county to pay those costs. We disagree.
    First, the responsible county by definition is statutorily obligated to pay the mental health services
    proceeding costs. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETYCODE ANN. 5 571 .018(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2000).
    Second, a nonresponsible     county conducting the mental health services proceedings is clearly
    authorized to bill the responsible county for those costs under section 571.018(b):
    The county responsible      for the costs of a hearing or
    proceeding under Subsection (a) shall pay the costs of all subsequent
    hearings or proceedings for that person under this subtitle until the
    person is discharged from mental health services. The costs shall be
    billed by the clerk of the court conducting the hearings.
    
    Id. 5 571
    .018(b) (emphasis added); see also Tex. Att’y Gen. Op. No. JC-0222 (2000) at 3
    (concluding that “section 571 ,018 now expressly requires the clerk ofthe court to bill the responsible
    county for the costs of the mental health services proceedings.“).
    You next ask about the mental health services proceeding costs which the responsible county
    is required to pay under section 571.018. As discussed above, the responsible county is required to
    pay the costs of all mental health services proceedings relating to a proposed patient that are
    provided for under chapters 571 through 577 of the Health and Safety Code until that person is
    discharged. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETYCODE ANN. § 571 .018(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2000). The
    costs of mental health services proceedings payable by the responsible county include, but are not
    limited to, those enumerated in section 571.018(c), which provides that:
    Costs under this section include:
    (1)    attorney’s fees;
    (2)    physician examination    fees;
    (3)    compensation for court-appointed personnel listed
    under Section 571.017 [court shall order payment of reasonable
    compensation to attorneys, physicians, language interpreters, sign
    interpreters, and masters];
    The Honorable Homer0 Ramirez        - Page 5      (K-0287)
    (4)    expenses of transportation to a mental health facility
    or to a federal agency not to exceed $50 if transporting within the
    same county and not to exceed the reasonable cost of transportation
    if transporting between counties;
    (5)    costs and salary supplements authorized under Section
    574.031(i) and (j) [for a judge who holds hearings at locations other
    than the county courthouse]; and
    (6)     prosecutor’s fees authorized under Section 574.031(k).
    
    Id. 3 571.018(c)
    (emphasis added). The Code Construction Act provides that “‘includes’ and
    ‘including’ are terms of enlargement and not of limitation or exclusive enumeration, and use of the
    terms does not create a presumption that components not expressed are excluded.” TEX. GOV’T
    CODE ANN. 5 3 11.005(13) (Vernon 1998); see also 
    id. (these definitions
    apply unless statute or
    context requires a different definition). Accordingly, the enumerated costs in section 571.018 are
    not exclusive.
    Additionally, a patient’s county of residence, rather than the responsible county, must pay
    court-approved expenses incurred for psychiatric evaluation and expert testimony for an indigent
    patient if ordered by the court under section 574.010. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN.
    5 571.018(f) (Vernon Supp. 2000). Section 574.010 authorizes the court to order an independent
    psychiatric evaluation of a proposed patient by a psychiatrist chosen by the patient; and to order the
    patient’s county of residence to pay for cow-approved      expenses for expert testimony if the court
    determines that the proposed patient is indigent. 
    Id. 5 574.010
    (Vernon 1992).
    The Honorable Homer0 Ramirez       - Page 6      (X-0287)
    SUMMARY
    The county that initiates emergency detention procedures or,
    if no such procedures are initiated, the county that accepts an
    application for court-ordered mental health services, issues an order
    for protective custody, or issues an order for temporary mental health
    services is generally responsible for paying mental health services
    proceeding costs under section 571.018 of the Health and Safety
    Code. A nonresponsible county conducting mental health services
    proceedings is authorized to collect the costs of those proceedings
    from the responsible county regardless of whether the responsible
    county has agreed to pay those costs. A county’s responsibility for
    paying mental health services proceeding costs is not limited to
    actions that are “derivative” of the initial commitment proceeding.
    The costs of mental health services proceedings payable by the
    responsible county include, but are not limited to, those enumerated
    in section 571.018(c) ofthe Health and Safety Code.
    Attorney General of Texas
    ANDY TAYLOR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    CLARK KENT ERVJN
    Deputy Attorney General - General Counsel
    SUSAN D. GUSKY
    Chair, Opinion Committee
    Sheela Rai
    Assistant Attorney General - Opinion Committee
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JC-287

Judges: John Cornyn

Filed Date: 7/2/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017