Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1991 )


Menu:
  •                           @ffice of tty !&tornep tkiecal
    Watt of &txae
    November 27,199l
    Honorable Allen Hightower                       Opinion No. DM- 4SB
    chalrman
    Committee on Corrections                        Re: Whether the amendment to article
    Texas House of Representatives                  42.18 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
    P.O. Box 2910                                   regarding the mandatory time that
    Austin, Texas 78768-2910                        inmates must serve prior to eligibility for
    parole is retroactive (RQ-65)
    Dear Representative Hightower:
    You ask a question about certain amendments to section 8(b) of article 42.18
    of the Code of Criminal Procedure adopted by the 70th Legislature. Section 5 of
    House Bill 680 and section 7 of Senate Bill 341 of the 70th Legislature amended
    section 8(b) to reduce the time that certain.prisoners had to serve before being
    eligible for parole. H.B. 680, Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 3&t, 3 5, at 1889; S.B. 341,
    Acts 1987, 70th Leg. ch. 1101, 5 7, at 3754. You ask whether this change applies
    only to inmates convicted after the effective date of the amendment. We conclude
    that it does.
    House Bill 680 does not limit the effect of its reduction of the time necessary
    to be served before parole eligibility with respect to the time of the commission of
    the crime for which the prisoner was sentenced.1 Because its effect is not
    detrimental to the affected prisoners, application of this change in the law to
    prisoners convicted of crimes committed before its effective date would run afoul of
    neither the a post  fucfodoctrine nor the restriction against retroactive laws found in
    article I, section 16, of the Texas Constitution. U.S. Const. art I, 0 9, cl. 3; 
    id. 0 10.
    %stion S of House Bii 669 also amended s&on 8(b) by adding seaions 8(b)(2) ~hrougb
    8@)(S). The changes made by the addition of these subsections were spccirrcaUymade applicable only
    to prisoners conkted of olhses committed on or after the cffeaivc date of the aa. Aas 1987, 70th
    kg., ch. 384, 5 g(a). Howew, seaions 8(b)(2) through s@)(5) were subsequcnlly repealed. Aas
    1989.71w Leg.. ch. 785,$5.01 at 3536.
    p.   227
    Hooorable Allen Hightower - Page 2                  (DH-ISB)
    CL1; Weaverv. GM,     
    450 U.S. 24
    (1981);M~llingerv. Ciryof Houston, 
    3 S.W. 249
    (Rx. 1887); Twtwvillev. Gondy, 
    272 S.W. 559
    (Tex. Cii. App.-Fort Worth 1925,no
    writ). Therefore, considered alone, the change in the time necessary to be served
    before parole eligibility effected by section 5 of House Bill 680 would apply to
    prisoners without regard to the time the offense was committed.          See also
    Schmolesky, 77LneChanges: GrowingComplerityin Texas Sentencing Law, 30 S.
    Tur L REV. 283,299.300 (1989) (ex post facto doctrine).
    However, Senate Bill 341 includes section 18(b), which expressly limits the
    effect of the amendment to section 8(b) by section 7 of that bill to prisoners
    sentenced for an offense committed on or after the effective date of the act. In
    construing acts passed at the same legislative session, the courts will read them as
    one act. Hendersonv. State, 
    758 S.W.2d 694
    (Ten App.-Austin 1988, no writ). For
    a later enacted provision to repeal a provision adopted earlier in the same session,
    there must be express repeal or an irreconcilable repugnancy between them. Id
    House Bill 680 was adopted after Senate Bill 341: but neither repeals nor conflicts
    with the earlier enacted act. In regard to the reduction of the time necessary to be
    served before parole eligibility, the later enacted act is silent as to its effect on
    prisoners sentenced for crimes committed before its effective date, and the earlier
    enacted act has an express provision making the change applicable only to prisoners
    sentenced for an offense committed after its effective date. Section 18(b) of Senate
    Bill 341 is the only express indication of the legislature’s intent regarding the effect
    of the amendments on prisoners with respect to the time an offense was cotmnittcd.3
    As we must harmonize the two bills we conclude that the application of the change
    made by the 79th Legislature reducing the time prisoners must serve before
    becoming eligible for parole is limited as provided by section 18(b) of Senate Bill
    341.
    *Senate Bi 341 was fmaUy adopted by the legislature on May 23.1987.    House Bii 680 was
    fmally adopted on May 25.1987.
    3Botb SCU.~CBii 341 and How     Bill 630 became &dive   OD   Sqtembcr   1.1987.
    p.    228
    Ijonorable hen   Hightower - Page 3          (DW45Bl
    SUMMARY
    The effect of the 1987 amendments to article 42.18.
    section 8(b). of the Code of Criminal Procedure
    reducing the time prisoners must serve before becoming
    eligible for parole is limited to prisoners convicted of
    offenses committed on or after the effective date of the
    amendments.
    DAN      MORALES
    Attorney General of Texas
    WILL PRYOR
    First Assistant Attorney General
    MARY KELLER
    Deputy Assistant .kzomey General
    JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY (Ret.)
    Special Assistant .ktomey General
    RENEA HICKS
    Special Assistant .\:tomey General
    MADELEINE B. JOHSSON
    Chair, Opinion Coxrnittee
    Prepared by John S:eine:
    Assistant Attorney- General
    p.   229
    

Document Info

Docket Number: DM-45b

Judges: Dan Morales

Filed Date: 7/2/1991

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017