Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1952 )


Menu:
  •              .      ,
    TTORNEY            G~ENERAL
    TEXAS
    PRICE  DANIEL
    ATTORNEYGENERAL.
    December 22, 1952
    Eon. Robert S. Calvert
    C&roller    of Public Account6
    Aurtin, Texas                       opinion No. v-1563
    Re:   Authority of the Comp-
    troller to promulgate
    a regulation allowing
    tax deductions to offset
    estimated non-highway use
    of special fuels in LPG
    Dear Sir:                                 delivery trucks.
    Your request for an opinion of this office reads:
    "We desire the opinion of your office regard-
    ing the legality of a propo66d method of accounting
    for the tax imposed by Section 14, Article 7065b,
    Vernon's Annotated Civil Statute6 upon the highway
    u6e of 'Liquefied Gas' (Butane-Propane) and 'Other
    Liquid Fuels' (Diesel Fuel), which became effective
    September 1, 1951. These two products are further
    defined in Section 1,of the lawas 'Special Fuels'.
    "The law imposes the tax upon the USE, or the
    DELIVERY INTO A FURL TARE FOR USE, of such fuels in
    propelling a motor vehicle upon the public highway
    of Texas, and places the responsibility for report-
    ing and paying over the taxes upon user-dealers.
    "'User-dealer' ie defined in Section 1 of the Act
    as (1) any distributor, dealer or other'person selling
    .          and delivering special fuels in this State into the fuel
    tank of any motor.v6hlcle for u6e in propelling said
    motor vehicle upon the public highway of Texas; e e D
    and (2) shall also mean and include any distributor,
    dealer or other p6r6,onWhO shall acquire any special
    fuel tax free and USE IT OR DELIVER IT IRTO A FUEL TARE
    FOR USE to propel motor vehicles operated by said dis-
    tributor, dealer or oth& #!crdonUpon the public high-
    way of Texas.
    "It is the second CssBifiCatiOn - the user-dealers
    who acquire liquHied.&sad     useit or deliver it into
    .
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (v-1563)
    the fuel tanks of their own vehicles for use on
    the highway - with whom we are here concerned.
    "Because of the expense and burden of in-
    stalling separate fuel tanks on each delivery
    vehicle, these user-dealers, who deliver their
    commercial cargos of IPG products by means of
    pressure pumps which are operated by the same
    motor (and fed by the same fuel tank) which al-
    so propels the tank truck over the highway, have
    urged the Comptroller to calculate - from a series
    of pump-off tests made on the various size and
    type vehicles operating in Texas - the overall
    average gallonage that would be necessary to pump
    off quantities of 100 gallons, 250 gallons, 500
    gallons and 1000 gallons of the cargos and that
    the Comptroller authorize such user-dealers to
    deduct the average gallonage determined in such tests
    for each such unit of delivery from their monthly tax
    remittances to the State.   They point to the second
    paragraph of Section 14(a) of the Act which provides
    'it is the intent and object of this section that the
    tax or taxes imposed herein on special fuels, as that
    term is defined, shall be paid by persons using or
    consuming said special fuels to generate power for the
    propulsion of motor vehicles upon the public highway
    of this State', and suggests that Section 23 of the
    Act, vests the Comptroller with sufficient regulatory
    powers to permit such tax accounting methods.
    "In further pursuance of the request, user-dealer
    members of the Texas Butane Dealers Association have
    made actual pump-off tests from 37 various types de-
    livery tank vehicles, namely, International, GMC, Ford.,
    Chevrolet, and Dodge trucks.   The quantities consumed
    in pumping off 1000 gallons of the cargo in such tests
    ranged from 7/1Cth of a gallon used in one truck to
    2.62 gallons used in another truck. The average con-
    sumption in the different make trucks ranged from 1.01
    gallons average in 8 Chevrolets to 1.56 gallons average
    in 5 International trucks, and about the same variation
    was reflected in different vehicles of the same make.
    Separate test6 from the same truck reflected various
    amounts of consumption under similar conditions. From
    th66e tests it appears obvious that the establishing of
    any mean or average pump off allowance for all trucks,
    or the establishing of any table of mean or average
    allowance6 for the different 6ize or make of trucks would
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 3 (v-1563)
    necessarily have to be based on estimate or guesswork.
    "It is likewise obvious that such user-dealers
    are presently paying taxes on fuel consumed in such
    pumping operation6 which would be exempt from taxa-
    tion under the law if such fuel could be accurately
    measured, or could be supplied from separate fuel
    tanks, though the latter remedy may be economically
    inexpedient.
    "In reviewing the request we are forced to the
    conclusion that any regulation promulgated to permit
    payment of the tax on an estimated basis because of
    individual cases of hardship would be inconsistent
    with the law which appears to be supported to some
    extent by your Opinion No. o-2381,holding that the
    Comptroller will not be required to approve any re-
    fund claim based upon a mere estimate or guesswork
    by the claimant as to the amount of motor fuel used.
    The Texae Butane Dealers Association, however, has
    urged that the question be submitted to you.
    'The opinion of your office is therefore respect-
    fully requested as to whether or not Section 23 of the
    Motor Fuel Tax Law, above referred to, vests the Comp-
    troller with sufficient authority to promulgate a
    regulation that would legally permit the deductions
    described above from tax remittances to cover non-
    highway use of fuel when such deductions must be based
    on an estimate of the quantity so used.   This depart-
    ment has made no departmental construction concerning
    this question other than above set out.   There is no
    litigation pending that will determine the answer to
    this question."
    In answering the question presented, we have assumed
    that the use of the fuel described in your request is not for
    the propulsion of a motor vehicle on the public highways of this
    State and would, therefore, not be subject to the tax if deliver-
    ed into a separate fuel tank.
    Tax deductions or refunds are in the nature of an exemp-
    tion and under the general rule must be strictly construed. 51
    Am. Jur. 502, Taxation, Sec. 495.   It has been held that the
    right of a claimant to make an application for a tax refund is
    statutory and that the procedure set out in the statute author-
    izing such refund must be strictly complied with in order to
    entitle the claimant to that right.   Att'y Cen. 0ps. v-1487
    (1952); v-721 (1948);0-6363 (1945);o-6195 (1944);Armstrong v.
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 4 (v-1563)
    Driscoll Construction Co-, 
    110 P.2d 651
    (colo.Sup. 1941).
    Article 7065b-23,V.C.S., provides in part:
    "It is hereby made the duty of the Comptroller
    to collect, supervise, and enforce the collection of
    all taxes, penalties, costs, and interest due or that
    may become due under the provisions of this Article,
    and to that end the Comptroller is hereby vested with
    all the',powerand authority conferred by this Article.
    Said Comptroller shall alB0 have the power and-author-
    ity to promulgate rules and regulations, not inconsis-
    tent with this Article or the Constitutions of this
    State or the United States, for the enforcement of the
    provisions of this Article and the collection of the
    revenues levied hereunder."
    Subdivision (a) of Article 7065b-14, V.C.S., provides
    in part:
    "There is hereby levied and imposed an excise tax
    of Four Cents (4#) per gallon on all liquefied gas
    used, or delivered into a fuel tank for use, in pro-
    pelling a motor vehicle upon the public highway of
    Texas, and Six Cents (64) per gallon on all other
    liquid fuels used, or delivered into a fuel tank for
    uBe in propelling a motor vehicle upon the public
    highway of Texas, and every user-dealer who sells
    and delivers liquefied @.B or other liquid fuels into
    a fuel tank or tanks used to supply fuel for the pro-
    pulsion of any licensed motor vehicle or any other
    motor vehicle being operated or intended to be
    operated upon the public highway of this State shall,
    at the time of such sale and delivery, collect the
    said tax at the rate or rates imposed upon the pur-
    chaser or recipient of said special fuels, in addition
    to his selling price, and shall report and pay to the
    State of Texas the tax so collected at the time and
    in the manner as herein provided.     Every user-dealer
    shall   likewise report and pay to the State of Texas,
    the tax at the rate or rates imposed hereinabove on
    each gallon of liquefied gas or other liquid fuels,
    hereinafter referred to as special fuels, acquired
    in any manner tax free by said user-dealer and there-
    after used, or delivered into a fuel tank for use, in
    propelling a motor vehicle upon the public highway
    of Texas.”    (Emphasis added throughout).
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 5 (v-1563)
    The rule with regard to the authority of an agency
    to make rules or regulations is stated in Volume 1 of Texas
    Jurisprudence Supplement at page 101:
    "A settled doctrine of Constitutional Law for-
    bids the delegation of legislative powers unless
    express warrant therefor, in some particular situa-
    tion, is to be found in the constitution.    Accor-
    dingly the Legislature cannot empower an agency to
    make laws.   But rule-making authority may be con-
    ferred upon an agency, and this has often been done.
    Express authority to adopt rules and regulations may
    be given by the words of the statute.   Implied au-
    thority exists, it seems, when the adoption of rules
    and regulations is necessary to accomplish the pur-
    pose of the statute.   So where a statute expressly
    authorizes an agency to regulate an industry it im-
    pliedly authorizes the adoption of regulations to that
    end.
    "When such authority, express or implied, has
    been conferred upon an agency, it may make reasonable
    rules and regulations, proper and necesssary in the
    exercise of its powers. But they must be within the
    clear intent of the statute, and not in excess of the
    powers delegated to the agency."
    The tax refund section of the Motor Fuel Tax Law (Art.
    706513-13)contains an elaborate and detailed reporting and
    record provision which was designed to prevent tax evasion and
    the filing of fraudulent tax refund claims.   Section 13 applies
    only to "motor fuel" as that term is defined in Section 1 of the
    act and therefore does not include "special fuels".
    Subdivision (I) of Article 7065b-14, V.C.S., provides
    that the owners of certain agricultural vehicles may consume
    qpecial fuels without qualifying as a user-dealer and paying
    the tax. SubdiviBion (f) of the statute contains a credit pro-
    vi~ionvhere the user-dealer has erroneously reported and paid
    more tax than was due on account of either a mistake of fact
    or law.
    It is clear from the language of Subdivision (a) of
    Art.~Otj~bi&that the Legislature intended that liquefied gas
    .or other liquid fuels (special fuels) which are sold and de-
    livered or delivered for use in a "fuel tank or tanks used to
    6Upply fuel for the propulsion of any licensed motor vehicle
    or any other motor vehicle being operated or intended to be
    operated upon the public highway of this State" were to be
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 6 (v-1563)
    Subject to the tax.   Since:~:there
    are no provisions for re-
    funds or for deductions, the presumption arises that the
    special fuels placed in these fuel tanks were to be used in
    propelling a motor vehicle upon the public highway.   To
    permit the taxpayer to make such deductions is, in effect,
    to allow a refund ~.'or
    an Offset to the taxes due and owing
    the State in the absence of statutory authority.   In addition,
    it is our belief that it would be impracticable, if not im-
    poESibl6, for you to promulgate rules or regulations which
    would result in the special fuels referred to in your reqU66t
    being calculated with the required degree of certainty. Att'y
    en. o-p.o-2381 (1940).
    It is our opinion that you are without statutory
    authority to promulgate rules or regulations allowing motor
    fuel tax deductions on special fuels consumed or used for the
    generation of power other than for the propulsion of mot&r
    vehicles upon the public highways from the same truck fuel
    tank6 which also supply the fuel for the propulsion of the
    truck upon the highways of this State.
    SUMMARY
    The Comptroller of Public Accounts has no
    etatutory authority to promulgate rules or regu-
    lations allowing tax deductions on special fuels
    consumed or used for the generation of power other
    than for the propulsion of motor vehicles upon the
    public highways from the same truck fuel tanks which
    also supply the fuel for the propulsion of the trucks
    upon the highways of this State.   Art. 7065b14,
    V.C.S.;Att'y Gen. QB.   v-1487 (1952); v-721 (1948);
    O-6363 (1945);o-6195 (1944);o-2381 (1940).
    APPROVED:                             Yours very truly,
    PRICE DANIEL
    W. V. Geppert                         Attorney General
    Taxation Division
    Mary 5. Wall
    Reviewing A66istant                   4f!irsA
    Assistant
    Charles D. !&hews
    First Assistant
    FL:ms
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1563

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1952

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017