Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1952 )


Menu:
  • Hon. Homer Garrison, Jr., Director
    Texas Department of Public Safety
    Austin, Texas '            Opinion No, V-1546.
    Re:   Action under Section 17
    of Article 6701h, V.C.S..
    when a driver's license
    Is suspended under Sec-
    tfon 22 of Article 6687b,
    Dear Colonel Garrison:          v,c.s,
    In your recent request for an opinion of thFs
    office, you ask the following question:
    "When the Department of Public Safety,
    pursuant to the authority granted in Sec. 22
    of Article 6687b, suspends a license after
    recefvfng a report from the court of an
    affirmative finding by the court on behalf of
    the Department, Is thfs such a suspension or
    revocation of a lfcense of any person 'upon
    receiving record of a conviction or a for-
    feiture of balls as to require the Department
    of Public Safety to suspend the registration
    for all motor vehicles regfsterjedin the name
    of such person as requfred by Set, 17(a) of
    Article 6701h, V.C.S;?"
    Subdivisfon (a] of Se,ction17, Article 6701h,
    V,C.S., reads;
    "Whenever the Department, under any law of
    this State9 suspends or revokes the license
    of any person upon recefvfng record of a con-
    vi:ctionor a forfeiture of bail, the Department
    shall alao suspend the registration for all
    motor vehfcles registered in the name of such
    person, except that the Department shall not
    suspend such regfetration, unless otherwise
    requfred by law, if such person has previously
    g%ven or shall immetliatelggive and thereafter
    lion;Homer Garrison, Jr., page 2 (Opinion go. V- 1546).
    .
    maintain proof:of financial responsibility with
    respect to all motor vehicles registered by such
    person."
    Subdivision (a) of Section 22, Article 6687b,
    V.C.S., reads:         $
    '(a) When under Section 10 of this Act
    the Director believes the licensee to be incapable
    of safely operating a motor vehicle, the Director
    may notify said liceneee‘of such fact and summons
    him to appear f,orhearing as provided hereinafter.
    Such hearing shall be had not less than ten (10)
    days after notification to the licensee or operator
    under any of the provlsions of this Section, and
    upon charges in writing a copy of which shall be
    given to said operator or licensee not less than
    ten (10) days before said hearing. For the pur-
    pose of hearing such cases jurlsdictlon Is vested
    In the mayor of the city, or judge of the police
    court, or a justice of the peace in the countg
    or subdivision thereof where the operator or
    licensee resides, Such dourt may admlhister oaths
    and may Issue subpoenas for the attendanCe of
    witnesses and the ljroductlonof relative books
    and papers. It shall be the duty of the cqurt
    to set the matter for hearing upon ten (10) days
    written notice to the Department. Upon such hear-
    ing, in the event of an affirmative finding by
    the court, the officer who presides at such hear-
    ing shall report the same to the Department which
    shall have authority to suspend said lloense for
    a period not greater than one (1) year;provided,
    however, that in the event of such affirmative
    finding the llcensee~may appeal to thencounty
    court of the counti wherein the hearing was held,
    said appeal to be tried de novo. Notice by
    registered mail to address shown on the license
    of licensee shall constitute service for the pur-
    pose of this Section.”
    The word “conviction” Is the key tb the answBp
    to the question you present concerning ArtLcle 670213. By
    Hon. Hager.Garrison, Jr., page 3 (Opinion No. V-15466),
    the wording of Section 17, the Department is authorFBed
    to suspend the registration of motor vehloles of a
    licensee,if it has first suspended or revoked the license
    of the llaensee upon receipt of a record of conviction
    or a forf'eltureof bail of the llcezisee.
    The term "conviction" ordinarily refers to the
    determination of the nuilt of a parts in a erlmiaal..DSPo-
    ceeding before a judicial tribunal. -SnoBgrass v. St&&,
    
    150 S.W. 162
    (Tex.Crlm. 1912); Hill v. Si%&, 41-53
    (1874).  In Snodgress v, State, the Court uoted,the
    definition for conviction given In 9 Cgq: 865, as f'ollaara:
    I#
    e In 9 Cyc, 865, the general ?ee,i"li$on
    of the word 'conviction'.is given as:
    finding of a person guilty,by a verdict of a
    jury; that legal prqceeding of record which as-
    certains the gullt,of the party, and upon which
    the sentence of judgment is founded.'"
    Conviction in its most extensive sense signifies
    given against a cfitilnal.
    A search of Texas ca;%c,elot~erpretib,g  the wol?d
    "convlctionn BhoWS that the word has been defined as
    the finding of a person guilty In a crimitialjudicial
    hearing, the judgment entered in a criminal judicial
    proeesdinq,,and the pronouncement of sentiencein a
    crimloal dudiceal proceeding, It is our opinion that
    the word convictfon" Is used in Article 6701h in tha!
    ordinary sense of a conviction In a e&-fmfnalproceeding.
    Ro Texas case Indicates that the term Includes-fact
    findings '&$oF* aq admitifstratfveoffieelr- It should be
    noted that in Section 22 of Article 6687b, the officer
    or court condustfng the hearing act,8in an adminiU&?a%ive~
    eapaelty iq,making the "afffrmat,ivefinding" upon whleh
    the Dewartment of Public S&e%Y ~usw``ndIs    the liaeaae.
    carpSaon, 248 S.W.26-241 (TexOClv.App. 1952).
    Pr$.nce'v~>
    wage                   shows that the LsgUGatuFe did n&
    cot%d&-"ea:h ac$fon under SeoiXoa 2s of Ar)i~l:@     66%~
    Thus It is evident utier subdlvigion   (a) of
    Section 17, Article    6701h, that the DepasWent is M
    suspend registration    only where the lloeneee has b&en
    found gulliq   in 6 criminal judlalal  proceeaing an4 the
    Deparfment hare received reoozff therear.
    The a&Ion   of awpenstorr abi& f&e Dspw@mmt
    is autho*ized to perf’orm under SactZon 22 0. &&lcle
    6687b is based upon the outcome of an BrttiQiatrative
    proaeedipg,   not a criminal fudba-ial prooeebl
    This sect$oa of AzWoLcle2. 687P-fwou d
    ie%pWion under subdivision
    1~1.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1546

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1952

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017