Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1952 )


Menu:
  • Hon. C. H. Cavness     Opinion V- 1507
    State Auditor
    Austin, Texas          Re: Legality of including "G:I."
    (Teague Bill) students in
    calculating the apportion-
    ment of public junior col-
    .lege'appropriati.ons,Land'
    the legality of afmltting
    ;;:;~a;~;;;,;;~;; o;;z;
    Dear Sir:                  tuition r.atesi
    ,We refer to your recent request addressed to
    this office which reads as follows:
    “i. We shall appreciate yo'uradvising
    us If in,yo.uropinion funds a,ppropriatedIn
    Article IV, House Bill 426 of the 52nd Legis-
    lature, may be. apportioned and paid to the
    Public Junior Colleges enumerated therein for
    semester hours being taken during the coming
    1952-1953 school year by students who are
    receiving education allowancesbenefits from
    the Federal Government as provided in H. R
    7656,  82nd Congress, Second Session, That
    Act Is known as 'Veterans Readjustment As-
    sistance Act of 1952.'
    'We quote herewith another question on
    the n.ewG.I. Bill from one of the State Col-
    leges (Senior) and,ask your opinion directly
    on it - of course all State Colleges will,be
    affected, This ia:
    'A question has arisen concerning
    the provisions of the new G.1. Bill
    for education of Korean veterans. Is
    it your Interpretation that an out of
    state student who is a. Korean veteran
    ,will pay the out of state tuition If
    he elects to attend a Texas State Sup-
    ported Instlt,utlon? A student whose
    Hon. C. H. Cavness, page 2 (V-1507)
    home is in another state has made
    application for admission to Texas
    ~College of Arts and Industries at
    the beginning of the coming fall
    semester and has objected to the
    payment of an o,ut-of-statefee on
    the ground that he is a Korean vet-
    eran."
    Article IV of House Bill 426, Acts 52nd Leg.,
    R.S. 1951, ch. 499, pm 1228, at page 1443, provides
    lump sum appropriations forthe:biennlum (September 1,
    1951, through August 31, 1953), and for the apportionment
    thereof to the public junior colleges listed therein which
    qualify under its provisions. Section 4 of Article 
    IV, supra
    , provides as follows:
    "The funds herein appropriated shall
    be disbursed to the Public Junior Colleges
    which qualify to rece,iveIt on the basis
    Of . . .($189) per capita for each full-
    time student equivalent enrolled in approved
    courses of study, OP proportionately if the
    total appropriation made by this Article
    should be insufficient to provide the full
    . . . ($189) per capita.
    "The term 'full-time student equlva-
    lent' as herein used shall be defined as
    a student taking fifteen (15) semester
    hours of approved courses; and the number
    of full-time student equivalents for any
    Junior College to be benefitted'by this
    Article shall,be determined by dividing
    by fifteen (15) the total number of semes-
    ter hours of approved courses carried by
    all eligible students as of November 1st in
    each fiscal ear, except that not more than
    eighteen (18";semester hours being carried
    on that date by any individual student shall
    be co,unted,nor shall the semester hours
    carried by any student in excess of a total
    of sixty-six (66) semester credit hours
    earned in a Public Junior College be
    counted; and provided further that the
    count;oO semester hours shall not include
    those being carried by any students who
    have not made timely compliance with the
    . requirements of Section 3 (a) above, -nor
    Hon. 6. H. Cavness, page 3 (V-1507)
    those being
    cept Vocatio
    tuition and fee expenses are paid by the
    United States Government.!'(Emphasis
    added throughout.)
    Section 3 referred to in the quoted,Section 4
    reads as follows:
    "It is further provided that to be
    eligible for and to receive a proportion-
    ate share of this appropriation a Public
    Junior College shall:
    "(a) Prior to November 1st of each year,
    collect matriculation and other session
    fees not less than the amounts provided Tgr
    by law for State-supported institutions of
    higher learning (for full-time and for part-
    time students from each enrolled student)
    ,&t. 2654c, V.C.S.7, except this shall not
    apply to any studeTitwho may be exempt from
    the payment of such fees by State law f&t.
    2654b-1, V.C.S,7; e . *'I
    Thus, in this statutory formula for proportlon-
    ate disbursement of the Junior college appropriations,
    it is provided that the count of semester hours required
    therein shall not include those semester ho.urscarried
    by any students whose tuition and fee expenses are paid
    by the United States Government, except vocational re-
    habilitants.
    In 1943 Section 3 of Article 2654b-1, V.C.S.,
    was enacted. This statute exempted from the payment of
    tuition at our public Institutions of collegiate rank
    veterans of the armed services of World War II, as
    designated therein, who were citizens of Texas, honor-
    ably discharged, and who had not been discharged on
    personal request or because over the age of thirty-
    eight years. But in 1945, after the passage of Public
    Law 346, 78th Congress, bestowing Federal ed,ucational
    benefits on certain veterans of the armed services of
    World !#arII, Section 4 of Article 2654b-1, V.C.S.,
    was enacted, which provides in part as follows:
    "Sec. 4. The exemption from the payment
    of dues, fees and charges as provided herein-
    above In Section land Section 3 of this
    ‘.
    Horn.C, H. Cavness, page 4 (V-1507)
    Article ,&t-. 2654b-1, V.C.S.7 shall ,not
    apply to or lnclude~honqrabl~ discharged
    members of such United States Armed Forces,
    or ,otHer persons hereinabove named, who are
    eligible for education or training benefits
    provided by the United States Government
    under Public Law No, 16, 78th Congress,
    f-vocational rehabllltants7, or amendments
    thereto, or'under Public-Law No: 346, 78th
    Congress  fi,I, Bill7 or amendments thereto,
    or under any other-Federal legislation that
    may be in force at the time of registration
    in the college concerned of such ex-service
    Oman or woman- As to all ex-service men or
    women as defined In this section, the govern-
    ing boards of each of the several institu-
    tions of collegiate rank, supported In whole
    or in part by public funds appropriated from
    the State Treasury, are hereby authorized
    to enter Into contracts with the Unlted
    States Government, or any of its agencies,
    to furnish .instructlonto such ex-service
    men and women at a tuition rate which covers
    the estimated coat of such Instruction or,
    in the alternative, at a tuition.rate of
    . ($100.00) a semester, as may be deter-
    mined by the governlnfiboard of 'the institu-
    tion concerned; 1 . .
    See also paragraphs 2 and 4 of Section 1 of
    Article 2654c, as amended in 1947 by House Bill 507, Acts
    50th Leg., R.S., 1947, ch. 218, p* 389, each containing
    the following provision:
    I9
    : . ,>provided that the nonresident
    registration fee may within the discretion
    of said governing'board be charged the
    United States Government for veterans en-
    rolled under the provisions of any Federal
    law and regulations authorizing education1
    or tre$nlng benefits for said veterans,
    9,i c
    Section 4 of Article 2654b-1 specifically con-
    cerns veterans entitled to "GoI." Bill lP.L, 346) educa-
    tional benefits, and.the manifest purpose of that law was
    to allow,the several public Institutions of oollegiate
    rank in Texas to realize tuition payments from the Govern-
    ment on such veterans, Att'y Gen, Op. V-688 (1948).
    H0n.C.. H. Cavness, page 5 (V-1507)
    Therefore, it seems,reasonable to suppose that.the .Legis-
    lature,~when it incorporated in the j.uniorcollege ap-
    propriation (Art. ,IV of H. B. 
    426, supra
    ) that provision
    prohibiting the inclusion of semester hours of veterans
    whose education is paid for by the Government, had in
    mind only the educational benefits afforde~diveterans
    under Public Law 346 or some other law'provlding for sim-
    ilar tuition payments by the Government. Tuition pay-
    ments under Public Law 346 are governed by the following
    provisions (see 38 U.S,C.A. 1951 pocket part, p. 248,
    Veterans Regulations):
    "The administrator shall pay to the eduea-
    tional or straininginstitution , . '; for each
    person enrolled infull time or part time course
    of education or training, the customary cost of
    tuition, and such laboratory, library, health,
    infirmary,~and other similar fees as are custo-
    marily charged,,and may pay for books, supplies,
    equipment, and other necessary expenseg,,e,x-
    elusive of,,borird,
    lodging, other liv$ng expenses,
    and travel, a$sare generalfy .requiredfor:the
    successful pursuit and completion of the'course
    by other students in the institution: Provided,
    That in no event shall such ayments, with re-
    spect,to any person, exceed $500 for an ordinary
    school year unless .the veteran elects Bo have
    such customary charges paid in excess :oP such
    limitation, in which event there shell be charged
    against his period of eligibility the proportion
    of an ordinary school year which such excess
    bears to $500: . _ . And ,providedfurther, That
    any lnstitutiqnmay app,lyto the Administrator
    fouran.adjustment of tuition and the Admlnis-
    trator, if he finds that the customary tu.&tion
    charges are insufficient to permit the'insti-'
    tution to furnish education or training to
    eligible veterans, or Inadequate compensation
    therefor, may provide for the payment of such
    fair and reasonable compensation as will not ex-
    ceed the estimated cost of teaching personnel
    and supplies for inatrnct-ion;and may in like
    manner readjust such payments from time to time.
    . . . in the computation of such estimated cost
    of teaching personnel and auppl1ea for instruc-
    tion in the case of any nonprofit educational
    institution, no reduction shall be made by
    reason of any payments to such Institution from
    State or municipal or other non-Federal public
    Hon..C. H. Cavness, page 6 (V-1507)
    funds, or from private endowments or gifts or'
    other income from nonpublic sources . . .'
    In addition to the above payments which are
    made directly to the educational Institution, the Govern-
    ment also pays a subsistence allowance to the,student.
    We think that in arriving at the true meanin
    and purpose of that provision in Article IV ofH. ,B. 
    42E supra
    , which excludes from the semester hourscount thosg
    hours taken by students whose tuition is paid by the
    United States Government, it is necessary to consider In
    pari materla therewith Section,4 of Article 2654b-1. When
    that provision is studied in Its proper relation to Arti-
    cle 2654b-1, it becomes readily apparent that the legiwla-
    tive intent was not to provide for a $189 per capita State
    apportionment or appropriation to junior colleges for any
    full-time student equivalent whose cost of Instruction
    was being paid directly to the college by the United
    States Government. The Legislature had In mind, we think,
    that the junior college would receive tuitionbenefits on
    veteran students from the Government under Public Laws
    346 recited In Article 26$+b-1, in such amounts as would
    make It unnecessary for the State to support junior col-
    leges with State appropriations toward'the education of
    such veterans. In this the Legislature reasoned car-
    rectly because, we are Informed, the junior colleges have.
    :   realized more on tuitions paid by the Government on Its
    Public Law 346 v~eteranstudents than the~$189 per capita
    appropriated by the State to assist in the education of
    full-time student equivalents receiving no tuition aid
    from the Government‘
    However, with respect to veterans ellglble for
    Government educational benefits under the Teague Bill
    (Public Law 550, 82nd Congress, 2d Sess.; H. R. 7656, to
    be codified 38 U,S,C,A., note foll. chap. 12) approved
    ,July 16, 1952, we find that Public Law 550 provides only
    for payments directly to the eligible veteran and llmlts
    the amount of tuition which the institution may charge to
    the established tuition which the-institution requires
    similarly circumstanced nonveterans to pay.
    Section 231 of H. R. 
    7656, supra
    , provides in
    part :
    "(a) the Administrator shall pay 2
    each eligible veteran who Is Pursuing a
    program of education  or training under this
    Hon. C. H, Cavness, page 7 (V-1507)
    title, and who applies therefor, an education
    and training allowance to
    expenses of his subsistence,
    supplies, books and equipment."
    : Section 232 provides in part as follows:
    "(a) The education and training allow-
    ance,of an eligible veteran who is pursuing a
    program of education or training in an educa-
    tional institution and is not entitled to
    receive an education and trainin allowance
    under subsection (b), (c), (d), $e), or (f)
    shall be computed as follows:
    "(1) If such program is pursued on a
    full-time basis,.such allowance shall be COW
    puted at the rate of $110 per month, if the
    veteran has no dependent, or at the rate of
    $135 per month, if he has one dependent, or
    at the rate of $160 per month,if he has more
    than,one d&pehdent;,...lr    ,:
    Section 234 provides as follows:
    "The Administrator may, if he finds
    public educational institution which'hoes
    not have established dharges for tuition
    and feeswhich It requires nonveteran Pesi-
    dents to pay, such institution may charge
    and receive from each eligible veteran who
    is a resident an amount equal to the estimat-
    ed .cost of teaching personnel and .auppliea
    for instruction attributable to such veteran,
    but in no event to exceed the rate of $10 per
    'monthfor a full-time course.'I
    Tuitions payable by nonveteran residents en-
    rolled in Texas public institutions of collegiate rank
    for fall and spring semester are fixed by statute, like-
    wise the minimum-maximum rates within which college
    .
    Hon. C. H. Cavness, Page 8 (V-1507)
    boards may yearly establish tuitions for summer ses-
    .sionsl Pars.,1 and 4, Sec. 1, Art. 26540, Q.C.S. The
    minimum-maximum rates for tuition which may be charged
    nonresident nonveteran students,.within,&loh oollege
    boards may establlsh,a fixed rate yearly, are 'also
    .preacribed by law. Pars. 2 and 4, Sec. 1, Art. 2654~.
    .'Therefore, the tuition of nonveteran students, resident
    and nonresident, are "established oharges" (established
    by statute with respect to residents, or established
    within limits fixed in the statute with respect to non-
    residents) within the meaning of the above underscored
    provision in Sectlon 234, H. R. 7656, supca. It follows
    : that the tuition chargeable to veterans, residents or
    nonresidents, who apply,and enroll for benefits under
    Public Law 550.(Teague Bill) may not be greater than the
    college legally~charges nonveteran students, residents
    or nonresidents;.respectively,
    Under Article IV of House Bill 
    426, supra
    ,our
    public junior colleges realize a state appropriation on
    each formula-determined nonveteran student, resident or
    nonresident, In the amount of $189. May the provisions In
    that appropriation bill be construed to deprive such col-
    mlegesof that $189 state aid .on veteran students, resl-
    dent or nonresident, who enroll under application for
    Teague Bill benefits, and are subject to the same tuition
    charges established for nonveteran students, resident and
    nonresident, without doing violence to the underlying
    purpose of the junior college appropriation bill hereln-
    before discussed? We think not.
    The clear purpose of the appropriation made'in
    the junior college bill was to grant state aid of $189
    or to the extent made avallabe, on each formula-determined
    student whose tuition charges muet be llmlted to those
    fixed In or eetabliehed~under provisions of Article 2654c,
    V.C.S.
    Therefore, it Is the opinion of this office
    that the funds appropriated In Article IV of House Bill
    426, supsa,may be apportioned and paid to the junior
    colleges enumerated therein on eemester hours being taken
    during the 1952-1953 school year by veteran students re-
    ceiving educational beneflte from the United States Govern-
    ment as provided in the Teague Bill, Public Law 550, 82nd
    Congress, 2nd Session.
    .   .’
    Hon. C. H. Cavness, page 9 (V-1507)
    In connection with your second question, it
    has been pointed out that Article 2654~ governs in,the
    matter of tuition that may be charged veteran applicants,
    resident and nonresident, who 'are eliglble for education
    benefits under the Teague Bill, Public Law 
    550, supra
    .
    We find no provision in Article 2654~ or ,otherState law
    which would authorize theeerning    boards of our'-public
    institutions of colleglate'rank to admit at resident tui-
    tion rates nonresident veterans of any war or national
    emergency, unless they a8 children.of armed service per-
    sonnel stationed In Texas come within the benefits of
    subsec,tion(6) ,of Section 1, Article 2654c, V.C.S. Att'y
    Gen. Cp. v-1502 (1952).
    Therefore, a nonresident stud.entwho Is a Korean
    ve~teranmuat pay the nonresident fees established for non-
    veteran nonresident students If he elects to attend a Texas
    State-supported institution of collegiate rank.
    SUMMARY
    Funds appropriated by Article IV of
    House Bill 426, Acts 52nd Leg. 1951, ch.
    499, pp.'1228, 1443, may be apportioned and
    paid to the junior colleges enumerated there-
    in for semester hours being taken during the
    1952-1953 school year by veterans receiving ~.
    educational benefits provided In Public Law
    550, 82nd Congress, 2nd Session.
    A nonresident student who is a Korean
    veteran and receiving paymentfor tuition and
    subsistence under Pi L. 550, 82nd'Congress,
    2nd,Session, will pay the nonresident tuition
    established for nonresident nonveteran stu-
    dents,.under the provisions of Article 2654c,
    V.C.S., if he elects to attend a~Texas State-
    supported institution of collegiate rank,
    unless the veteran Is the child of armed
    service personnel:ab%%ed in Texas and thereby
    homes within the benefits of subsectlon~(6)
    of Section 1, Article 
    2654c, supra
    .
    Yours very   truly,
    APPROVED:                          PRICE DANIEL
    J. C. Davis, Jr.                 Attorney General
    County Affairs Division
    Mary K. Wall
    Reviewing Assistant
    Charles D. Mathews                     Assistant
    First Assistant
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1507

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1952

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017