Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1952 )


Menu:
  •      -’
    June 16, 1952
    Hon. R. Y. Lindsey, Jr.   Opinion No. v-1461
    County Attorney
    Dawson,County             Re:   Necessity fQr the answer
    Lamesa, Texas                   to plaintiff's petition
    in civil suits In jus-
    tice courts to be in
    Dear Sir:                       writing.
    ~,Werefer to yo'urreq~uestfor an opinion of
    this office concerning the necessity for a written
    answer to plaintiff's petition in civil wits   In jus-
    tice courts, in the light of the amendment of Rule 101
    of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
    Rule 
    101, supra
    , as amended by the Supreme
    c-
    Co,urton October 10, 1951, became effective March 1,
    19520 See 14 Texas Bar Jo,urnal633. As amended, that
    rule now reads in part as follows:
    "The citation shall be styled 'The State
    of Texas' and shall be directed to the defend-
    ant and shall command him to appear by filing
    a written answer to the plaintiff's petltlon
    at or before 10 o'clock a.m. of the Monday
    next after the expiration of 20 days after
    the date of service thereof, statlag the
    place of holding the court. . . e
    Rule 101 Is a part of those rules which gov-
    ern civil procedure in the district and county courts.
    Prior to its amendment, the rule req,uiredthat the clta-
    tions command the defendant "to appear and answer." Now
    it commands defendant "to appear by filing a written
    answer."
    Rules 523, 525, 526, 534, and 535 are a part
    of the rules specifically controlling civil practice
    in the j~usticecourts. These rules of,procedure read
    in part as follows:
    “Rule 523 n District Co,urtRules Govern.--
    All r,ules governing the district and county
    courts shall also govern the justice  courts,
    ‘-
    Hon. R. Y, Lindsey, Jr., page 2   (~-1461)
    insofar as they can be applied
    where otherwise specially providelaw
    or these rules." [Emphasis added.)
    -.
    "Rule 525* Oral Pleadings---The
    pleadings shall be oral, except where
    otherwise specially provided; but a brief
    statement thereof may be noted on the
    docket; provided that after a case has
    been appealed and Is docketed .ln the co'un-
    ty (or district) court all pleadings shall
    be reduced to writing."
    "Rule 526. Sworn Pleadings,--@
    answer or other pleading setting up any
    of the matters specified in Rule 93 shall
    be in writing and signed by the party 0;
    his attorney and verified by affidavit.
    (Rule 527 contains f,urtherprovisions with
    respect to a plea of privilege.)
    "Rule 534. Citation. When a claim
    or demand is lodged with a justice for
    suit, he shall issue forthwith citations
    for the defendant or defendants. The clta-
    tion shall require the defendant to appear
    and answer plaintiff's suit at or before
    10:00 osclock a.m. on the Monday next after
    the expiration of ten days from the date
    of service thereof, and shall state the
    place of holding the court. . . 011
    "Rule 5350 Answer Filed.--Where clta-
    tion has been personally served at least
    ten days before appearance day, exclusive
    of the day of service and of return, the
    answer of the defendant shall be filed at
    or before ten o'clock a.m. on such day.
    D o .II
    
    R,ule523, supra
    , clearly pr,ovidesthat the
    rules governing the district and county courts shall be
    applicable to justice court proceedings when not in con-
    flict with the existing rules and stahtes  relating  to
    civil procedure in the justice courts. Rule 525, how-
    ever, provides that the pleadings In a justice co,urt
    "shall be oral" except where otherwise specially provid-
    ed. Rule 101, as amended, does not specifically req'uire    - -
    that pleadings in the justice courts shall be in writing.
    Hon. R. Y. Lindsey, Jr., page 3    (v-1461)
    Nor does Rule 101, as amended, In any way modify, super-
    sede, or repeal Rules 525, 526, 527, 534, and 535, which
    exist unchanged to govern civil answers in the justice
    courts.
    Therefore, it is the opinion of this office
    that Rule 101, as amended, does not req,ulrethe answer
    to plaintiff's petition In civil suits In justice courts
    to be In writing*
    You have called our attention to the language
    In R~ule535 which states that the answer of the defendant
    "shall be filed." Prior to the adoption of the Rules of
    Civil Procedure in 1940, It was clearly the rule that the
    defendant's answer In the justice court 'couldbe oral un-
    less it set up a matter which was specially required to,be
    pleaded In writing. Where the answer was pleaded orally,
    a brief statement of its contents was noted on the docket.
    Moore v. Jordan, 
    67 Tex. 394
    , 
    3 S.W. 317
    (1887); Low v.
    Griffin, 
    41 S.W. 73
    (1897). The official notes appended
    to Rule 535 show that the rewording of the prior articles
    in the civil statutes from which this rule was taken was
    for the purpose of changing the time of answering and not
    the manner of answering. It is our opinlon that the change
    made by Rule 535 was not Intended to require the filing of
    a written answer In the justice court.
    SUMMARY
    Rule 101 of the Texas R~ules of Civil
    Procedure, as amended, does not req,ulrethat
    answers to plaintiff's petition in civil nits
    In justice courts shall be in writing.
    Yours very truly,
    APPROVED:                     PRICE DANIEL
    Attorney General
    J, C. Davis, Jr.
    County Affairs Division
    Mary K. Wall                BY
    Reviewing Assistant               Chester E. Olllson
    Assistant
    Charles D. Mathews
    First Assistant
    CEO:mh
    

Document Info

Docket Number: V-1461

Judges: Price Daniel

Filed Date: 7/2/1952

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017