Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1951 )


Menu:
  •                            November     20,   1951
    Hon. Robert S. Calvert                  Opinion      No. V-1351
    Comptroller   of Public Accounts
    Austin, Texas                           Re:   Exemption from inherit-
    ance taxes of bequest to
    Kerr County War Memo-
    Dear   Sir:                                   rial Association.
    You have requested the opinion of this office as to
    whether a bequest to Kerr County War Memorial      Association  is
    exempt from inheritance  taxes by virtue of Article 7122, V.C.S.
    From the file submitted with your request we have
    gathered the following facts. In his last will and testament Wal-
    ter Jarmon made the following provision:
    “FOURTH:    All the rest and residue of my prop-
    erty and estate, whether the same be real, personal
    or mixed, monies, notes, bonds, stocks, proceeds from
    insurance policies,   chases in action, and all other prop-
    erty belonging to me of whatever type or description
    it may be, I hereby give, bequeath and devise to W. G.
    Garrett, Jr. and L. D. Garrett, as Trustees,    for the
    use and benefit of Kerr County War Memorial       Associa-
    tion, or its successors,   said Association being formed
    for the purpose of perpetuating the memory of those
    persons who lost their lives in the service and defense
    of the United States, and which said Trustees    shall have
    the following rights, powers and duties:
    ,“l. To hold, manage, control, sell, execute con-
    veyances of, dispose of, incumber,          invest, reinvest
    proceeds of, rent or lease, all or any part of my said
    property and estate, and any amounts so received, as a
    result of the execution of said above powers, shall be
    paid over to the said Kerr County War Memorial             Asso-
    ciation, or its successors,       by my said Trustees,    as in
    their discretion    they shall deem proper, such sums so
    paid over to be used by the said Association         or its suc-
    cessors    in the erection,   construction,   maintenance    or
    upkeep of a Memorial        Building to be erected in memo-
    ry of those persons who gave their lives in the service
    of and defense of this Country.
    .
    Hon. Robert    S. Calvert,      Page    2 (V-1351)
    “2. I do hereby empower my said Trustees,      if
    in their discretion they deem proper, to convey and
    execute proper instruments   of conveyance   to the said
    Kerr County War Memorial     Association   or its succes-
    sors, of my said property and estate, or any part of
    the same.
    “3.  The said trust herein created shall continue
    to exist for a period of ten years, unless sooner ter-
    minated by the said Trustees    by the execution of any
    of the powers herein conferred.     In the event such trust
    is not so terminated,  then at the expiration of such ten
    year period, all of my property and estate then remain-
    ing shall pass to and vest in fee simple in the said
    Kerr County War Memorial      Association,   or its succes-
    sors:
    Articles II, III, and VI of the Constitution and By-laws
    of the Kerr   County War Memorial      Association   read as follows:
    “Article     II - Object
    “Section 1~
    The object      of this association        shall be
    (a)   to erect, equip, maintain and operate a
    memorial   community building to honor all
    those who served in World Wars.
    (b)   to provide opportunities   in such building
    in Kerr County for wholesome      recreation,
    education, civic and other leisure-time
    activities on a democratic    community-wide
    basis.
    “Article    III - Board     of Directors
    “Section 1~
    The management      and administration    of the affairs
    of this association   shall be vested in a board of direc-
    tors of 50 members      who shall serve until January 1,
    1946. One month previous to January 1, 1946 the Presi-
    dent of the association    shall call a meeting of the citi-
    zens of Kerr County for the purpose of electing a New
    Board to carry on the affairs of the association.       Said
    board to consist of as many directors       and to serve such
    time as shall at that time be determined.
    “Article      VI - Meetings                        -.
    Hon. Robert   S. Calvert,   Page   3 (V-1351)
    “Section 1.
    There shall be an annual~meeting of the citizens
    of Kerr County the first Monday in November.     Such
    meeting shall be publicized through the local papers.
    “Section 2.
    (a) There shall be an organization    meeting of
    the board of directors   held as soon as possible after
    the annual meeting of members      for the purpose of
    electing officers, appointing committees    and transact-            ,
    ing such other business as shall come before it.
    .I
    . . .
    Article  7122, V.C.S.,  provides an exemption from in-
    heritance taxes for “property    passing to or for the use of the United
    States or any r,eligious, educational   or charitable organization when
    such bequest, devise or gift is to be used within this State.”
    In Attorney General’s    Opinion V-958 (1949), this office
    pointed out that the exemption allowed for charitable bequests is
    not limited by the requirement    that property pass directly to a
    charitable corporation  or institution, but is allowed if the property
    -,   passes to or for the use of a charitable organization.
    The devise and bequest made by the above quoted por-
    tions of Mr. Jarmon’s   will therefore passed at his death tax free
    if the Kerr County War Memorial      Association constitutes a “char-
    itable organization”  within the meaning of Article 7122.
    In general, the distinctive features of a charitable or-
    ganization are that it has no capital stock and no provision for
    making dividends or profits, but derives its funds mainly from
    public and private charity and holds them in trust for tfe objects
    expressed  in the instrument creating the organization;      and the
    ‘In construing the exemption from ad valorem          taxation al-
    lowed institutions of purely public charity, our Supreme Court
    made the following statement:
    “In our opinion, the Legislature      might reasonably    con-
    clude that an institution was one of ‘purely public charity’
    where:      First, it made no gain or profit; second, it accom-
    plished ends wholly benevolent;       and third, it benefited per-
    sons, indefinite in numbers and in personalities,        by prevent-
    ing them, through absolute gratuity, from becoming burdens
    to society and to the state.
    .I
    . . . Charity need not be universal to be public.       It is
    public when it affects all the people of a community or state,
    by assuming,       to a material extent, that which otherwise
    might become the obligation or duty of the community or
    the state.”      City of Houston v. Scottish Rite Benev. Assoc.,
    
    111 Tex. 191
    , 
    230 S.W. 978
    , 981 (1921).
    Hon. Robert        S. Calvert,   Page 4 (V-1351)
    test is whether the organization  exists to carry out a purpose
    recognized   in law as charitable or is maintained for gain, profit,
    or private advantage.    People ex rel. Hellyer V. Morton, 
    373 Ill. 72
    , 
    25 N.E.2d 504
    , 506 (1940); Congregational    Sunday School &
    Publishing Society vn Board of Review, 
    290 Ill. 108
    , 125 N.E~ 7,
    9 (1919).
    In Boyd v. Frost National Bank, 
    145 Tex. 206
    , 
    196 S.W.2d 497
    (1946)    the court discusses charitable purposes.  We
    quote the following excerpt from page 501 of the opinion:
    The authorities   leave no doubt that the
    6.
    ”   ”   I
    words ‘charitable    purposes’ have a fixed meaning in
    law and that a judicial determination      may be made
    with satisfactory   certainty in every case where the
    question of whether a given purpose is or is not char-
    itable arises.    Chapter 4 of the statutes of 43 Eliza-
    beth, enacted in 1601, known as the Statute of Charita-
    ble Uses, although not adopted in Texas,       “is regarded
    by many authorities     as the principal test and evidence
    of what the law will consider charitable      uses,’ and the
    enumeration    of those uses as set out in the preamble
    to the act was accepted as authoritative      in Powers v.
    First National Bank of Corsicana,       138 Tex, 604, 
    161 S.W.2d 273
    .
    “Illuminative   in this regard is the following quo-
    tation from Zollman’s     American     Law of Charities,   8.187,
    pa 123: ‘It must never be forgotten that the words “char-
    ity” and “charitable”    are technical terms.     Since the
    statute of Elizabeth,   they have had a technical meaning
    both in England and America,       including even those states
    in which the statute has been repealed or has not been
    re-enacted    or adopted,   “They are lifted from their
    popular and lexicographical      meaning.   In them survives
    a history from which they have derived a special sig-
    nificance.   They condense volumes of controversy        and
    decision into a phrase which must be now read by the
    growing light under which it has been developed.”        ’
    “And the following excellent definition of ‘charity’
    and ‘a charitable   use’ is evolved in 2 Perry, Trusts
    and Trustees,   7th ed., § 697, p” 1182:  ‘It will be seen
    that the words “charity*’ and “a charitable use” have a
    somewhat technical meaning in the law. * * * The
    word “charity” in its widest sense, denotes all the good
    affections  men ought to bear toward each other; in a
    more restricted    sense, it means relief or alms to the
    poor; but in a court of chancery the signification    of the
    Hon. Robert   S. Calvert,     Page   5 (V-1351)
    word is derived from the statute of Elizabeth,          [and a
    public charity need have no special reference          to the
    poor.]   Hence it has been said that those’purposes           are
    considered   charitable which are enumerated          in the
    statute, or which by analogy are deemed within its
    spirit or intendment.     Another short but practical       def-
    inition ha’s described   it as ‘a gift to a general public
    use, which extends to the poor as well as the rich.”
    But Mr. Justice Gray has given a definition which in-
    cludes all the facts and circumstances,        and all vari-
    eties of charity under the law, and leaves nothing to
    be desired.    In his words, a charity in a Legal sense
    may be more fully defined as a gift to be applied, con-
    sistently with existing laws, for the benefit of an in-
    definite number of persons,--either       by bringing their
    hearts under the influence of education or religion, by
    relieving their bodies from disease,       suffering,    or con-
    straint, by assisting   them to establish    themselves      for
    life, or by erecting or maintaining public buildings or
    works, or otherwise lessening      the burdens of govern-
    ment.” ’
    “Current legal concepts of what are charitable
    purposes are well gathered into the following classifi-
    cation in II Restatement, Trusts, 6 368, p. 1140:
    * ‘Charitable    purposes    include
    (a)   the relief of poverty;
    (b)   the advancement     of ~education;
    (c)   the advancement     of religion;
    (d)   the promotion of health;
    (e)   governmental    or municipal purposes;
    (f)   other purposes the accomplishment        of
    which is beneficial    to the community.’
    “Other guides which will satisfactorily    conduct
    the inquirer to an answer of the question, what are char-
    itable purposes,   are 2 Bogert, Trusts and Trustees,
    8~361 et seq.; Zollman, American     Law of Charities,   set,
    184 et seq.; 14 C.J.S.,  Charities,  5 1 et seq., p. 410 et
    seq.; 10 Am. Jur., Charities,    pa 584 et seq.”
    The following testamentary     gifts have been held ex-
    empt from death taxes as passing for charitable or public purposes
    or to charitable institutions:   a gift for the support of a symphony
    orchestra,   State v. Central Trust Co., 
    17 Ohio App. 423
    (1923); a
    bequest to Shakespeare     Memorial   Theatre organized to keep alive
    Shakespeare’s    memory by the production and presentation       of plays
    ’ ..
    Hon. Robert   S, Galvert,   Page   6 (V-1351)
    and also to assist poor members      of the theatrical profession,   In
    re Hackett’s Estate, 
    234 N.Y.S. 299
    (1929); a bequest for the use
    of a farm foundation which was established      to encourage   commu-
    nity effort and to improve rural life, People v. First Nat. Bank,
    
    364 Ill. 262
    , 4 N.E.Zd 378 (1936); a bequest to an incorporated
    memorial,    the purposes of which were to bring about the civic
    betterment    of the residents of the United States and preferably
    of those residing in the State of Ohio, Tax Commission       v. Livin-
    good, 
    40 Ohio App. 543
    , 
    178 N.E. 707
    (1931); a gift to the inhabit-
    ants of a town for the construction    and maintenance   of a town hall,
    In re Clark, 
    131 Me. 105
    , 
    159 A. 500
    (1932).
    Cases recognizing   as charitable trusts for the com-
    memoration,    maintenance,   or preservation  of particular events
    or objects,  monuments,   memorials,    and shrines are discussed   in
    
    12 A.L.R. 2d
    888-893.
    In view of the foregoing authorities,  as the purposes
    or objects of the Kerr County War Memorial       Association   previ-
    ously quoted are clearly charitable,    we conclude that it is a “char-
    itable organization”  within the meaning of Article 7122.     Since the
    further statutory requirement    that the bequest or devise must be
    used within the State is also met, the property which passed under
    the fourth clause of Mr. Jarmon’s     will passed tax free.
    SUMMARY
    The Kerr County War Memorial      Association,
    organized for the purpose of erecting and maintaining
    a memorial   community building honoring all who served
    in World Wars, is a ‘charitable   organization”    within
    the meaning of Article 7122, V.C.S.    Since the require-
    ment of Article 7122 that the bequest or devise must be
    used within the State is also met, no inheritance     taxes
    are due on property which passed by will to trustees
    for the use of the Association.
    Yours     very   truly,
    APPROVED:
    PRICE DANIEL
    W. V. Geppert                         Attorney General
    Taxation Division
    Everett Hutchinson                    B $4$usz-h<,                     4&
    Executive Assistant                      Mrs. Marietta          9
    Mc   regor Creel
    Assistant
    Charles D. Mathews
    First Assistant
    MMC/mwb