Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •                                The Attorney            General of Texas
    JIM MATTOX
    Decenber 31, 1985
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Building         Mr. William S. Na:L:;                     Opinion No.   .TM-47.0
    P. 0. BOX 12548                Executive Directo::
    Austin, TX. 78711. 2548        Texas State Board of                      Re: Whether the Texas State Board
    512,4752501
    Dental Examine:%                       of Dental Examiners may allow the
    Telex 9101874-1367
    Telecopier  51214750266
    411 West 13th Street, Suite 503           delegation to dental hygienists cf
    Austin, Texas   7wo1                      smoothing roughened root surfaces
    714 Jackson, Suite 700         Dear Mr.   Nail:
    Dallas, TX. 7520245OS
    2la742.8944
    You ask for a clarification of certain amendments made by the
    Sixty-ninth Legislature to the Dental Hygiene Act. V.T.C.S. art.
    4824 Alberta Ave., Suiie 180   4551e.
    El Paso, TX. 799052793
    915/53534e4                         The legislature amended the definition of "dental hygiene" to
    read as follows:
    1001 Texas, Suite 700
    Houston, TX. 77002-3111                        The term 'dental hygiene,' and the practice
    7131223~5886                               thereof as used In this Act shall mean and is
    hereby defined as (a) the removal of accumulated
    matter, tartar, deposits, accretions or stains,
    SW Broadway, Suite 312
    Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479
    except rlottledenamel stains, from the natural and
    8061747-5238                               restorecl surfaces of exposed human teeth, and
    restoraf:ions  therefor in the human mouth, the
    smoothing;of the roughened root surfaces, and the
    4309 N. Tenth, Suite S
    McAlle”, TX. 78501-1885
    polishing; of said surfaces; (b) the making of
    5121882-4547
    topical application of drugs to the surface
    tissues of the human mouth aud to the exposed
    surface of human teeth; (c) the making of Dental
    200 Main Plaza, Suite 400                 X-rays ; and (d) such other services and procedures
    San Antonio. TX. 78205.2797
    as may 'XL prescribed by the Texas State Board of
    51212254191
    Dental Examiners in its Rules and Regulations;
    provide<,,however, that such services, tasks, or
    A” Equal Opportunity/                     proceduws defined as dental hygiene are performed
    Affirmative Action Employer               in compliance with Section 3 of this Article.
    (Emphasis in original).
    Acts 1985, 69th Ls:g,.
    , ch. 80, 51, at 320 (underlined language added by
    Sixty-ninth Legirilature) (to be codified as article 4551e, 51,
    V.T.C.S.)
    p. 1916
    Mr.   William S. Nail - Page 2   (JM-420,)
    Section 3(a) of article 4551e, V.T.C.S., governs delegation of
    certain tasks to dental h:rj;ienists.This provision was also amended
    by the Sixty-ninth Legislar:ure.
    The Texas State Board of Dental Examiners may
    by rule permit a licensed dentist to delegate the
    performance of a service, task, or procedure to a
    licensed hygiendst under the direct or general
    supervision of the dentist; provided, however,
    that the licensed hygienist shall not be permitted
    to diagnose a dental disease or ailment, prescribe
    any treatment or a regimen thereof, prescribe,
    order, or disptn,se medication, or perform any
    procedure which F:s irreversible or which involves
    the intentional cutting of the soft or hard tissue
    by any means. Plothing herein shall be construed
    to prevent a dentist from authorizing a dental
    hygienist employoilby said dentist to instruct and
    educate a patient in good oral hygiene technique
    or to provide 2. medication as ordered by said
    dentist to said patient. This Act does not pro-
    hibit the incidental removal of cementurn by a
    dental hygienist&ring   the smoothing of roughened
    root surfaces.
    
    Id. 53, at
    321 (underlined language added by        69th Leg.)   (to be
    codified as art. 4551~. §3m:a),V.T.C.S.).
    In regard to those amendments. you ask:
    Assuming that 'the smoothing of the roughened
    root surfaces' is an irreversible procedure or
    'involves the intentional cutting of the soft or
    hard tissue by ,%ny means,' may the dental board
    delegate to dental hygienists the permitted duty
    of smoothing of the roughened root surfaces in
    view of the language added by the Sixty-ninth
    Legislature to article 4551e, section 1.
    The Sixty-ninth Legislature passed a bill the purposes of which
    were (1) to add "the smoothing of roughened root surfaces" to the list
    of tasks that make up tk.e practice of dental hygiene and (2) to
    provide that the prohibit!.cmson the delegation of certain kinds of
    tasks to dental hygienist,3 are not intended to prohibit "the inci-
    dental removal of cementurnby a dental hygienist during the smoothing
    of roughened root surfaces." Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 80, at 320.
    Ae a general rule, the,board may not allow dentists to delegate
    to dental hygienists irrev~erslbleprocedures or procedures involving
    the cutting of tissue. V.T.C.S. art. 4551e. 93(a). The legislative
    p. 1917
    Mr. William S. Nail - Page 3 (JM-420)
    history of House Bill NC. 1229 informs us that the smoothing of
    roughened root surfaces, also known as "root planning," is a basic
    treatment for gum disease.      Dental hygienists may perform the
    procedure in 43 other rotates, and the procedure is part of a
    hygienists's training. Bjll Analysis to H.B. No. 1229, prepared for
    House Committee on Public 'health,filed in Bill File to B.B. No. 1229,
    Legislative Reference Library. We assume that the smoothing of
    roughened root surfaces it;,by its nature, irreversible. You do not
    inform us whether generally accepted methods of smoothing roughened
    root surfaces involve the: cutting of tissue. Obviously, however,
    House Bill No. 1229 was intended to make clear that the board could
    permit dentists to delegate to hygienists the task of smoothing
    roughened root surfaces. The legislature obviously contemplated that
    hygienists would do so usiq the method or methods generally taught to
    them in their training. 'Thus, the board may permit a dentist to
    delegate to a hygienist Forking under the dentist's supervision the
    smoothing of roughened roo’tsurfaces by generally accepted methods.
    SUMMARY
    The Texas Ste,te Board of Dental Examiners may
    promulgate a rul'zallowing dentists to delegate to
    dental hygienists the smoothing of roughened root
    surfaces by gene,callyaccepted methods.
    J-h
    Very truly yours
    .
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    JACK HIGHTOWBR
    First Assistant Attorney G,zneral
    MARY KELLBR
    Executive Assistant Attorwy   General
    ROBERT GRAY
    Special Assistant Attorney General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committe,?.
    Prepared by Sarah Woelk
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 1918
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-420

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017