Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •                                 The Attorney          General of Texas
    JIM MAlTOX                                        December20, 1985
    Attorney General                                                        JM-399 OVERRULED H-708
    Supreme Court Building         Mr. Jim Lusk                             OpinionNo. m-399
    P. 0. Box 12549
    Austin, TX. 79711. 2549
    ExecutiveDirector
    51214752501                    Texas AmusementMachine Commission        Re: Prorationof occupationtax
    Telex 9101874.1367             P. 0. Box 13226, Capitol Station         under article 8802, V.T.C.S.,
    Telecopier 5121475-0286        Austin,Texas 78"l.l                      and proration of license and
    registrationfees under article
    714 Jackson, Suite 700                                                  8817, V.T.C.S.
    Dallas, TX. 75202.4509
    21417428944                    Dear Mr.   Lusk:
    4824 Alberta Ave., Suite 180
    You ask severlrl.
    questionsregardingproratioaof certain fees and
    El Paso, TX. 79905.2793
    taxes to be collect,zd
    by the Texas AmusementMachine Commission. The
    915/5333494                    commission issues .and collects fees for licenses and registration
    certificatesfor persons who engage in business activitiesinvolving
    coin-operatedmacI.ines. V.T.C.S. art. 8817. The cmisslon also
    1001 Texas, Suite 700          collects the annual occupation tax on coin-operated machines.
    Houston, TX. 77002.3111
    7131223-5886
    V.T.C.S. art. 8802.
    Your first qucmtiondeals with fees for licensesand registration
    506 Broadway, Suite 312        certificates. Art:lcle 8817 specifiesannual fees for various licenses
    Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479        and sets a $50 registrationfee for persons who are exempt from the
    So6(747-5238
    licensingrequiremnts but who own and exhibit coin-operatedmachines.
    V.T.C.S. art. 8817,,5116, 16A. All licensesissued under article 8817
    4309 N. Tenth. Suite S         expire on December:31st of each year. 
    Id. 19. It
    is implicit in
    t&Allen, TX. 7950%1885         article 8817 that registrationcertificatesalso expire ou December
    512/@2-4547
    31st of each year. Compare art. 8817. §9, and art. 8817, 016A.
    Consequently,many :Lnitlallicensesand registrationcertificatesare
    20 Maln Plaza, Suite 4Ml       valid for less thm a full year. You ask whether you may prorate the
    San Antonio, TX. 79205.2797    fee for an initial Licenseor registrationcertificateo* a quarterly
    5121225-419l                   basis. We couclud~! that you cannot prorate fees for such licensesand
    registrationcertificates.
    An Equal Opportunity/
    Affirmative Action Employer        This office hm issued severalopinionsdealingwith prorationof
    license fees. Thorn opinionshave reached differentconclusionsas to
    the propriety of proration based on the language of the relevant
    statutes.
    In a 1970 op~xlon this office consideredwhether the Texas State
    Department of Bealth could prorate licensing fees under article
    4477-6,V.T.C.S. AttorneyGeneral OpinionM-580 (1970). That statute
    provided that such Iicensesmust be renewed each year by January 1st.
    V.T.C.S. art. 4477-6. 013. The section of the statute that listed
    p. 1826
    Mr. Jim Lusk - Page 2   (JM-3'39)
    annual fees for licenses began with the following words: "The
    following fees shall accospany each application.. . ." &I& 112.
    This office concludedthat those words made clear that the department
    had no authorityto prorate the annual fee for the initial license. A
    1972 opinion relied on sim:.l.ar
    language in the Texas StructuralPest
    Control Act, article 135b-6, V.T.C.S., in concluding that the
    StructuralPest Control Boatedcould not prorate the initial fee for a
    licenseunder the act. AttfxmeyGeneral OpinionM-1107 (1972).
    In contrast,AttorneyI:eneral OpinionH-708 (1975) concludedthat
    the fee provided for in the :iollowing
    statute could be prorated:
    The annual felrfor each auctioneer'slicense
    issued by the cormisslonerto a resident of this
    state is $100.      The annual fee for each
    auctioneer'slicenseissued by the coamissionerto
    a nonresident is $300. The commissioner shall
    issue the license,upon receipt of payment of all
    license fees. All licensesexpire annuallyon the
    last day of December of each year and shall be
    renewed upon the ,ceceipt
    of the written request of
    the licenseeand ,therequired licensefee. . . .
    Acts 1975, 64th Leg., ch. 320,   54(a), at 828 (the 1975 version has
    since been amended by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., ch. 314, at 842).
    AttorneyGeneral Opinion H-708 distinguishedAttorneyGeneral Opinions
    M-580 and M-1107 because th#rstatutesconsideredin those two opinions
    containedlanguage requiringan initial applicationto be accompanied
    by the specifiedfees, whereas the language in the statute considered
    in Attorney General Opinian E-708 set an "annual fee" but did not
    specifically require that the "annual fee" accompany an initial
    application. Therefore, tke opinion concluded,the annual fee could
    be prorated for a licenset'l;ltwould not be valid for a full year.
    The language used in article 8817 compels us to follow Attorney
    GeneralOpinionsM-580 and Id-1107rather than AttorneyGeneral Opinion
    H-708, the continuingvalidity of which we would question in any case.
    As we pointed out prev1out;l.y.section 16 of article 8817 specifies
    annual license fees, and contains the following provision regarding
    applicationsfor licenses:
    The application must be accompanied by the
    annual license f:e in the form of a cashier's
    check or money order payable to the coamission.
    (Emphasisadded).
    V.T.C.S. art. 8817, 513. Betcause article 8817 sets out annual license
    fees in one section and 1x1another section requires that an initial
    applicationfor a licensebe accompaniedby "the annual license fee,"
    YOU nay not prorate the fee :Eoran initial license.
    p. 1827
    Mr. Jim Lusk - Page 3   (JM-399)
    Also, article 8817 mntains the following provision regarding
    registrationfees:
    The fee for registrationof machines affected
    by this section L:s $50 for the business entity in
    which the owner'smachines are exhibited. The fee
    shall be paid to the cosmissionby cashier'scheck
    or money order.
    V.T.C.S. art. 8817, §16A(L,).Here the statute simply sets a fee --
    not an "annual" fee - for registrationand then requires that "the
    fee" be paid to the cosneiss:Lon.This languagedoes not permit you to
    prorate the initial fee for registration.
    Your second question is whether you may prorate the occupation
    tax on coin-operatedmachines. V.T.C.S. art. 8802. Article 8802
    provides:
    Every 'owner', save an owner holding an import
    license and holding coin-operatedmachines solely
    for re-sale, who owns, controls, possesses,
    exhibits,displa:rtr,or who permits to be exhibited
    or displayed lr. this State any 'coin-operated
    machine' shall pay, and there is hereby levied on
    each 'coin-operai:ed
    machine',as definedherein in
    Article 13.01, except as are exempt herein, an
    annual occupationtax of $30.00, except that the
    annual tax on each coin-operatedmachine that is
    designed exclusively for showing motion pictures
    is $1,500.00. 'Ihe tax shall be paid to the
    commissionby caabier'scheck or money order.
    In 1941, this office consideredwhether the Comptrollerof Public
    Accounts could make a rule permittingthe payment of occupationtaxes
    on coin-operatedmachines on a quarterly basis. Attorney General
    Opinion O-3009 (1941). This office concludedthat the comptrollerhad
    no authorityto do so. The requestorhad suggestedthat the following
    statutewould permit such ,arule:
    [T]he payment of the specific tax herein provided
    for, shall be required by the collectorof taxes
    to be made befor<,any person, firm, or association
    of persons shall be allowed to engage in any
    occupation requ::ringa license under the pro-
    visions of this                             

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-399

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017