Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  • .’
    The Attorney                     General           of Texas
    -.Decembcr 2.          1905
    JIM MAlTOX
    Attorney General
    Suprcm6 Cowl BulldIng         Honorable   term1           1. Smith                          Opinion    lo.   m-386
    P.0.Box12545                  chairm6n
    AUCIln.lx 75711.2545          comictee    on Crimfml               Jurispmdcncr             Rc:     Whether an   aldentanof 6
    51Y4752501
    Tcxar Eoure      of Rcyresentetives                           general   ldw city       uay 8eave l*
    Telex 5la574.1267
    P. 0. Box 2910                                                a member of that         city's police
    Td.coplrr 5121475-0255
    betin, Texas               Xl69                               reeenw
    714 Jackson. Suitr700         Dear Representative               Smith:
    Dall6c,~ 752024505
    214n42a644
    You reque8t            w     opinion   on the follwlng          question:
    a24 AIbmC   AVE..Sulle 160                     Can m     6lderwn    on the                     city  council  of  l
    El P6ao.TX. 198052763                       general ltav city legally   se-e                    as a member of that
    615f533.3464                                same ciq’8   police rererrre?
    loolT*x4s.sullr 700                Article    9986,    V.T.C.S.,     authorizes                   a   general       lav city to
    wouslon.Tx. 77002.3111       eetabli6h    a pollctc re6erve   force:
    7cmm
    :        (a)               body of en7 city.
    The governing                tom.   or
    Village                 for the l6tabllstment
    :u6y provide                     of 6
    we Broulrry.Suilo 312
    Luboock.tx 764013r7s                       ;dFz,., ceawy,e ~fo~tiori;ber6        of   the   police
    6ce747-5255                                         f       f                6hall be appointed
    ‘at the~dircretioo   of the chiei of police and shall
    oeme   OII puce   officeF6,. during   the actual     dis-
    008 N. TmIh, SUII.8
    charge         of officiel        duties~. :..;~
    McN6n. lx. 7wol-1565                       .
    512l662d647
    (b)        ,%    governing     body s&l      l6trblirb   quali-
    fiutionr     and standard6            of tr6inins    for members of
    200 MIllIPlU& Suit.No
    ``t``l``~i,I.c````~=e~d                       msP lfmit     the size
    sari ~ntodo. Tx. 762052767
    512/22541s1
    (4         No person
    ``              appointed
    to the police      reserve
    force       y        cm-    8     veapon or
    otherviee      act es l
    p ea c e o ffic er u ntil h e I166 beeo l     p p r wed by the
    pvernimlg     body.    titer   lpprwal.     he UI      earn   l
    ve66on     onlr yhen      lutho&ed      by     the -Chief - of
    Police,,    and- when dirctirgin$    official     duties a6 a
    duly ecmrtituted puce officer.
    (d)   kkmbers of the police reseme   force serve
    at    the   discretion of the chief of police end may
    be    callscd into remice    at my time the chief of
    RonOr6bL6 ferr61       Il. Soitb     - I’eSe 2   (M-386)
    r
    police     COn6ider6 it       neee6mry   to have ldditionel
    officers     to preruve         the puce    rod enforce   the
    ~16V.
    (e)   llemben af the police      .rememe force uy
    ,seme without eompme~tion       but the governing     body
    6~    prwide    uuifom   compen66tiou for members of
    the police reserve force.       The compens6tio6 shell
    be b66ed solely      qon  time  rerved   by l peder    of
    the police reeerwc fotee vhile in treinins     for,   or
    in the perform&Inca of, officiel     dutier.
    .cer,      end reserve        (
    6th benefits   6et cut %n Chapter
    66
    86, Acts of the 60th Legialrture,         Regul6r     Sc6sion,
    1967, 66 6mended (Article         622Sf. Vernon's        Texas
    Civil   Statutes).    prwided.    hwev6r.      that    nothing
    in thi6 Act 6he1.1 be construed           to 6utborize       or
    petmit   6 member aIf the police         re6eme      force to
    becoue eligiblr      for p6rticip6tioo      in 6ny peurion
    fund crated       pur6mnt    to St6te stetute        to vhich
    regul6r   officerr     cney become l ,.memb by     er p6yroll
    deductions or othc~nrire.
    (8) R666q6 police OffiC6rO 6h611 6Ct only in
    6  suppltoPrnt6ry,c6p6city      to the reguler       police
    force 6nd 6h611 ‘.LIP no. c66e ls6uue the full         ti6te
    duties of r,&lar       police   officerr     without  first
    complying dtb     6:llL requirement6     for  such reguler
    police officers.
    (h)   This Act doer not lfmit the pwer           of the
    uyor    of   my gwerel-kv           city   to 6unnon   into
    service    l 6pccirl  police      force,    66 prwided   by
    Article    995, Rrri6ed     Civil      St6tuteo  of Tex66.
    1925.    (Eoph66is ldded) .
    The city   council hm conofldlerable supervisory        pwer   wer   the police
    reseme.    The council lst6b:lisbes      tbe force end determine6      it6 size.
    It   sets   qu6lifiestions     6nd tr6ininS      stend6rdr   for   member6 and
    determiner   vbetber they rh611 receive       compen66tion 6nd ho6pit61       6nd
    medic61 6srist6nce.       No inclividuel  member of the police re6eme force
    m6y C6rry 6 Ye6pon or otherraise 6Ct 66 6 police officer           until he h66
    been 6pproved by the city council.         &
    p.   1768
    ’ .
    Ronor6ble   Terre1   1. Smith a. P6Se 3      (RI-386)
    In    our   opinion.   tba!   coIIIDon In,      doctrine
    of  incomp6tibility
    prohibits    an eldermen     on xhe city    councilSener61 16~ city
    of l            from
    lewin``6 e member of the city's        police   reseme.     This doctrine
    prevents one perron frw    boldinS  two offices    if the duties    lr6    in
    conflict or if one 16 &bl,rdinate  to the other.
    District    So. 1, 50 S.W.2d :
    other grounds 6ub nom. Prultt         v. Glen Rome Independent School District
    No. 1, 
    84 S.W.2d 1000
    T;:.            1935) ; Attoruey Cenerel. Opinionm m-203
    pA;pv-303          (19071.   Sea!
    ---   6160  Stete v. Martin,      51 S.U.2d 615 (Tex.
    .     . - Snn Antonio      15,32, no vrit).    Coasideratioer     of incompati-
    bility   al60 bar 6 public csfflcer from rppointing           himself to en office
    or employment over vhich lrtr holds the appointive             paver.     Eblinger   v.
    Clark.   8 S.W.Zd 666 (Tex. 1928); Attorney Gmnerd Letter               Advi6ory No.
    ii$7l975);      see al60 Starr County v. Cuerra. 297 S.W.?d 379 (Tar. Civ.
    . - Ssn Antonio 1956, no vrit).           Although 8 member of the re6eme
    is appointed by the police: chief,         he MY not exercise       the poverr of a
    peace    officer      until  the    city   council    6pprwer     hi6    lppointnent.
    V.T.C.S.    art. 9986(c).       The city council’m 6pprov61 power rerembler            a
    rbared    povcr    to rppoiot.                         Attoruey General       Letters
    Advisory g06. 156, 132                                    rbared pov8r to l     p p o ic   t
    in context of nepotism +ertion).                In viev   of the city       council'6
    supervision     and other 6ul.bority      over member6     of the police. reserve
    force,   and the accountabi:l!Lty of police        resewe    force member6 to the
    city council.     a member of the city council may not 6etve on the city's
    police   re6eme.
    SUMWART                      .
    Article   996a, V.T.C.S.,      Sives the city council
    con6iderable    6uIeKVisO9     authority   over MtDber6     Of
    the police     re66crre force      and uk46     the     force
    accountsble    to the city eouoeil.        The cow00 l~v
    doctrine    of   ir.comp~tibility     therefore    bars     an
    alderman on the city council of l general lav city
    from also serv1r.g es a member of the city's police
    re6erv•.
    Very   truly       your
    .
    J-J~
    JIM     UATTOX
    Attorney Gener61            of Texas
    JACX RIGEITMR
    yir6t A66i6tant      Attorney   (k!oeral
    gonorable     terrrl      1. Smith - pege     4     (``-386)
    NARYRELLER
    Executive Assistant          Attorney    General
    ROBERT GMT
    Special     &rirtont       AttorSey    ~;arner&l
    RICR GILPIN
    Chairmm,  Gpfnion          Coumittee
    Prepared     by Swan       L. Garrim~n
    Ammiot6nt      Attorney     General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COM4ITTEE
    RI& Gilpin,            Chaiamw
    Colin Carl
    SU6m      G6rri6OU
    Tony Gull109
    Jim Moellinger
    Jennifer   Riggs
    Nancy Sutton
    Sarah Vqelk
    BNCe    Youngblood
    --   .Z
    ,
    p. 1770
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-386

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017