Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1985 )


Menu:
  •     /
    -
    ‘The Attorney       General of Texas
    JIM MAlTOX                                    March 27. 1985
    AttorneyGeneral
    Carlos D. Godinez. M.D.                  Opinion No. JM-304
    President
    Texas State Board oE Medical             Re:  Whether section 5.09(a)
    Examiner8                             of article 4495b. V.T.C.S.,
    P. 0. Box 13562, CapLtol Station         authorizes a physician to
    Austin, Texas   78711                    collect reimbursement for
    drugs supplied to patients
    714 Jack6on. SUItO 700
    oallas, TX. 75zozm             Dear Dr. Godinez:
    2lu742-8944
    You ask whether a physician may be reimbursed for the coat of
    4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160   dangerous drugs or controlled substances supplied a patient under the
    El Paec..TX. 799052793         authority of sectton 5.09(a) of article 4495b, V.T.C.S., of the
    OlY53334M                      Medical Practice Act.  Article 5.09 reads in Its entirety:
    1001 ma*    swa 700                         Sec. 5.09. (a) A person licensed to practice
    l4oueton. TX. 77002-311t                 medicine under this Act is authorized to supply
    71-                                      the needs of his patients with any drugs or
    remedies as are necessary to meet the patients’
    immediate: needs; provided, howwer, this section
    Suite 312
    808 Emadw*y,
    LubtJcck,
    TX.70401447Q                      doesaotpem&tthepttpaMantonperatea         retaW
    emf747-5235                             pharmacy vithout first complying with the Texas
    Phermacy Act.
    Uoo N. Tsnth. Sulle B                                            physician  vho   practices
    cb) A    licensed
    McAllsn, TX. 78501-1485
    51-7
    uidlcinc in a rural area in which there is no
    pharmacy may maintain a supply of dangerous drugs
    ,ln the o:E:Mce of the physician to be dispensed in
    200 MaIn Ptua, wte uw)                  the course of treating the physician’s patients
    San Antonlo. TX. 752052797              and may be reimbursed for the cost of supplying
    512n2n101
    those dtqs without obtaining a license under the
    Texae~ Pharmacy Act     (Article 4542a-1, Vernon’s
    Texas Civil Statutes).       Such physicians shall
    comply with all appropriate labeling sections
    applicable to this class of drugs under the Texas
    Pharmacy    Act,   and    oversee  compliance with
    packaging and recordkeeping sections applicable to
    this elms of drugs. For the purposes of this
    subsectimn:
    (1) t’hc term ‘rural area’ means an area in
    which there is no pharmacy within a 15-mile radius
    of the physician’s office. and is within:
    p. 1379
    Dr. Carlos D. Godinez - Page :!
    (A) a county with a total population of 5,000
    or less according to the most recent federal
    census; or
    @)   a   city    or   town,   incorporated   or
    unincorporated,  with  s population  of less  than
    2,500, according to the most recent federal
    census, but shall not include a city or town.
    incorporated or unincorporated, whose boundaries
    arc adjacent to ar, incorporated city or town with
    an equal or greater population.
    (2) the term 'reimbursed for cost' shall mean
    an additional cha,rSe separate from that made for
    the physician's    professional   services which
    include the cost af the drug product and all other
    actual costs to the physician incidental to
    providing the dispensing service but not including
    a separate fee for the act of dispensing the drug
    product itself.
    The Sixty-eighth Legislature added section 5.09(b) to the Medical
    Practice Act and an identlc.al provision to the Texas Pharmacy Act.
    Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. S90, 551, 2 (codified as V.T.C.S. srts.
    4542a-1, 033(c); 4495b. i5.09). The ssme enactment placed the word
    "retail" before "pharmacy" in section 5.09(a), originally enacted in
    1981 as section 5.09 of the YledicalPractice Act. -See Acts 1981. 67th
    -
    You first ask:
    1. May a phys::cianwho, under the authority of
    section 5.09(a) of the Medical Practice Act,
    suppl.iesdangerow drugs or controlled substances
    to a patient tc meet the patient's Imediate
    needs. be reimbursed for the cost of the drug
    product supplied :Lf [certain conditions are met].
    The Medical Practice Act does not define "supply." Rowever,
    section 3.06(d), authorizing: a physician to delegate to others the
    administration or provision of dangerous drugs, defines "provision" as
    follows:
    'provision' means 'cosupply one or more unit doses
    of a drug, medicf&, or dangerous drug. The drug
    or medicine shal~l be supplied in a suitable
    container thathasbeen   labeled in compliance with
    the applicable dru:glaws. (Emphasis added).
    V.T.C.S. art. 4495b, 13.06:~1)(3)(4). When the patient is "supplied"
    medicine. he is given one or more doses to take with him and to use
    p. 1380
    Dr. Carlos D. Godinez - Page 3 (JM-304)
    according to the physician's instructions. See also V.T.C.S. art.
    4542a-1. 119(f); Attorney    General Opinion MI-410 (1981) (under
    Pharmacy Act physician may administer medication to patients without
    being licensed as a pharmacist).
    Section 5.09(a) does not expressly permit reimbursement for the
    cost of drugs supplied under its authority. It does not pennit a
    physician to operate a reta:tl.pharmacy without first complying with
    the Texas Pharmacy Act.    The Texas Pharmacy Act, article 4542a-1.
    V.T.C.S., includes In sectiorl19 an exemption for physicians expressed
    in language similar to that in.section 5.09(a):
    (c) This Act does not apply to a practitioner
    licensed by the npproprlate state board who
    supplies his patients with dNgS     in a manner
    authorized by stale or federal law and vho does
    not   operate a plumnacy   for the retailing of
    prescription drugs.,
    Texas Pharmacy Act, Acts 15181, 67th Leg., ch. 255, 519(c), at 650
    ("retailing" is incorrectly codified at V.T.C.S. art. 4542a-1.
    119(c)). Section     19(c) and section 5.09(a) are provisions In par1
    materia which should be CoriE~truedtogether. Calvert v. Fort Worth
    National Bank, 356 S.W.Zd 918 (Tex. 1962); State Board of Dental
    Examiners V, Fenlav.   357 S.W.Zd 185 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1962, no
    VI-it).
    The Pharmacy Act does not prevent a physician from charging a
    aeparllceree tar adnU.niSteY~ii``~   \r.T.ti;.S.
    art. 4 ~--s-l``
    "Admlnlster"
    means the direct application of a prescription
    drug by injection,, inhalation, ingestion, or any
    other means to the body of a patient by:
    0     a practiM&ner    or    an   authorized agent
    under his supervIsion; or
    (W    the pat:lent at       the   direction   of   a
    practitioner.
    
    Id. 15(2). Nor
    Is a physicl.anbarred from dispensing or distributing
    ~scriptioa   drugs to his own patients. 
    Id. 119(a),(c). The
    relevant
    terms are defined as follows:           7
    (16)   'Dispense' means preparing, packaging,
    compounding,    or   labeling  for   delivery   a
    prescription drug or device in the course of
    nrofessional
    .             nractice io an ultimate user or his
    agent by or pursJ;mt to the lawful order of a
    oractltioner.
    p. 1381
    Dr. Carlos D. Codinex - Page ,b (JM-304)
    (17)   ‘Distribute’ means the delivery of a
    prescription dNg     or device other than by
    administering or dispensing. (Emphasis added).
    
    Id. 55(16), (171.
    However. he may not “operate e pharmacy for the
    ?6&iling of prescription drugs.” 
    Id. 119(c): see
    also V.T.C.S. art.
    4495b. 55.09(s). If a physician se%    drugs to individual patients,
    even at cost,   the pharmacy, act considers  him to be operating a
    pharmacy for the retailing of drugs. - See  Attorney General Opinion
    MW-410 (1981).
    Attorney General Opinion MW-410 (1981) construed section 19(c) of
    the Texas Pharmacy Act to prohibit the physician from charging a
    separate fee for drugs provided to the patient for self-medication.
    The opinion states as follow:
    We believe a physlc:Lanwho charges a separate fee
    for   dispensing    dNgS    t0   a   patient   for
    self-medication engages in the retailing of drugs.
    When a physician retails drugs, he is engaging in
    the practice of pharmacy within the statutory
    definition. A physician may. however, administer
    drugs directly to IXLSpatients, see sections 5(g),
    19(d). and we believe he maymake       a separate
    charge for so d’o:Lngwithout engaging in the
    practice of pharmayf.
    ~ectio````e~e~ca``~a~tice                            Act. ConstNed in
    pari materis with section 19(c) of the Pharmacy Act,      prohibits a
    physician from charging a fee to cover the cost of drugs supplied to a
    patient for self-medication. unless such physician practices in “a
    rural ares” as defined In article 5.09(b).
    You also ask:
    2.  If a physician may not be reimbursed for
    the cost of a drug product supplied to a patient
    under the clrcumutances described in the first
    question, are thaw any circumstances under which
    a physician may be reimbursed for the actual costs
    to the physician of a drug product supplied to a
    patient to meet the patfent’s immedfate needs,
    other than the* cfccumstances described in the new
    Section 5.09(b) oi’ the Medical Practice Act. which
    addresses the authority of rural     physicians to
    dispense dangerous drugs?
    Section 5.09(b) and an identical provision codified as section
    33(c) of article 4542a-1, V.T.C.S.. authorize a physician vho
    practices in a “rural area” to dispense dangerous drugs to his
    patients and be reimbursed for the cost of supplying the drugs.
    <’   ’
    Dr. Cerlos D. Godinex - Page 5 (JM-304)
    “Rural   *reel’
    is defined rer;trictlvely. This narrow exception wes
    enacted to exempt rural physicians from the prohibition against
    charging a separate fee For      prescription medicine supplied to
    patients. See Bill Anslys~ilito House Bill No. 1474, prepared for
    House Committee on Public Realth, filed in Bill File to Rouse Bill No.
    1474. Legislative Reference 'LLbrary (bill which included 85.09(b) of
    article 4495b. V.T.C.S.. end 133(c) of article 4542a-1, V.T.C.S.).
    Section 5.09(b). as an exception to e general prohibition, should
    be strictly construed. --
    liunslqer v. Boyd, 
    26 S.W.2d 905
    (Tex. 1930).
    Corpus Christi v. McClaugher~r, 
    284 S.W.2d 927
    (Tex. Civ. App. - San
    Antonio 1955. writ ref'd).     Unless he complies with the various
    requirements of section 5.OS(b), a physician who is not a licensed
    pharmacist may not be reimbursed for the cost of drugs supplied to
    meet a patient's immediate needs.
    SUMMARY
    A physician who supplies dangerous drugs or
    controlled substances to a patient under authority
    of section 5.09(a). article 4495b. V.T.C.S.. may
    not be reimbursed Eor the cost of the product
    supplied. Section 15.09(b) provides sn exception
    permitting rural physicians who come vithin its
    terms to charge o fee for the cost of drugs
    supplied to patients.
    Attorney   General of Texas
    TOMGREBN
    First Assistant Attorney General
    DAVID R. RICEAXDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney   General
    RICX GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 1383
    Dr. Carlos D. Godlnez - Page 6   (JM-304)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Cilpin. Chairman
    Susan Garrison
    Jim Moellinger
    Jennifer Riggs
    p. 1384
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-304

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017