-
/ - ‘The Attorney General of Texas JIM MAlTOX March 27. 1985 AttorneyGeneral Carlos D. Godinez. M.D. Opinion No. JM-304 President Texas State Board oE Medical Re: Whether section 5.09(a) Examiner8 of article 4495b. V.T.C.S., P. 0. Box 13562, CapLtol Station authorizes a physician to Austin, Texas 78711 collect reimbursement for drugs supplied to patients 714 Jack6on. SUItO 700 oallas, TX. 75zozm Dear Dr. Godinez: 2lu742-8944 You ask whether a physician may be reimbursed for the coat of 4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 dangerous drugs or controlled substances supplied a patient under the El Paec..TX. 799052793 authority of sectton 5.09(a) of article 4495b, V.T.C.S., of the OlY53334M Medical Practice Act. Article 5.09 reads in Its entirety: 1001 ma* swa 700 Sec. 5.09. (a) A person licensed to practice l4oueton. TX. 77002-311t medicine under this Act is authorized to supply 71- the needs of his patients with any drugs or remedies as are necessary to meet the patients’ immediate: needs; provided, howwer, this section Suite 312 808 Emadw*y, LubtJcck, TX.70401447Q doesaotpem&tthepttpaMantonperatea retaW emf747-5235 pharmacy vithout first complying with the Texas Phermacy Act. Uoo N. Tsnth. Sulle B physician vho practices cb) A licensed McAllsn, TX. 78501-1485 51-7 uidlcinc in a rural area in which there is no pharmacy may maintain a supply of dangerous drugs ,ln the o:E:Mce of the physician to be dispensed in 200 MaIn Ptua, wte uw) the course of treating the physician’s patients San Antonlo. TX. 752052797 and may be reimbursed for the cost of supplying 512n2n101 those dtqs without obtaining a license under the Texae~ Pharmacy Act (Article 4542a-1, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes). Such physicians shall comply with all appropriate labeling sections applicable to this class of drugs under the Texas Pharmacy Act, and oversee compliance with packaging and recordkeeping sections applicable to this elms of drugs. For the purposes of this subsectimn: (1) t’hc term ‘rural area’ means an area in which there is no pharmacy within a 15-mile radius of the physician’s office. and is within: p. 1379 Dr. Carlos D. Godinez - Page :! (A) a county with a total population of 5,000 or less according to the most recent federal census; or @) a city or town, incorporated or unincorporated, with s population of less than 2,500, according to the most recent federal census, but shall not include a city or town. incorporated or unincorporated, whose boundaries arc adjacent to ar, incorporated city or town with an equal or greater population. (2) the term 'reimbursed for cost' shall mean an additional cha,rSe separate from that made for the physician's professional services which include the cost af the drug product and all other actual costs to the physician incidental to providing the dispensing service but not including a separate fee for the act of dispensing the drug product itself. The Sixty-eighth Legislature added section 5.09(b) to the Medical Practice Act and an identlc.al provision to the Texas Pharmacy Act. Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. S90, 551, 2 (codified as V.T.C.S. srts. 4542a-1, 033(c); 4495b. i5.09). The ssme enactment placed the word "retail" before "pharmacy" in section 5.09(a), originally enacted in 1981 as section 5.09 of the YledicalPractice Act. -See Acts 1981. 67th - You first ask: 1. May a phys::cianwho, under the authority of section 5.09(a) of the Medical Practice Act, suppl.iesdangerow drugs or controlled substances to a patient tc meet the patient's Imediate needs. be reimbursed for the cost of the drug product supplied :Lf [certain conditions are met]. The Medical Practice Act does not define "supply." Rowever, section 3.06(d), authorizing: a physician to delegate to others the administration or provision of dangerous drugs, defines "provision" as follows: 'provision' means 'cosupply one or more unit doses of a drug, medicf&, or dangerous drug. The drug or medicine shal~l be supplied in a suitable container thathasbeen labeled in compliance with the applicable dru:glaws. (Emphasis added). V.T.C.S. art. 4495b, 13.06:~1)(3)(4). When the patient is "supplied" medicine. he is given one or more doses to take with him and to use p. 1380 Dr. Carlos D. Godinez - Page 3 (JM-304) according to the physician's instructions. See also V.T.C.S. art. 4542a-1. 119(f); Attorney General Opinion MI-410 (1981) (under Pharmacy Act physician may administer medication to patients without being licensed as a pharmacist). Section 5.09(a) does not expressly permit reimbursement for the cost of drugs supplied under its authority. It does not pennit a physician to operate a reta:tl.pharmacy without first complying with the Texas Pharmacy Act. The Texas Pharmacy Act, article 4542a-1. V.T.C.S., includes In sectiorl19 an exemption for physicians expressed in language similar to that in.section 5.09(a): (c) This Act does not apply to a practitioner licensed by the npproprlate state board who supplies his patients with dNgS in a manner authorized by stale or federal law and vho does not operate a plumnacy for the retailing of prescription drugs., Texas Pharmacy Act, Acts 15181, 67th Leg., ch. 255, 519(c), at 650 ("retailing" is incorrectly codified at V.T.C.S. art. 4542a-1. 119(c)). Section 19(c) and section 5.09(a) are provisions In par1 materia which should be CoriE~truedtogether. Calvert v. Fort Worth National Bank, 356 S.W.Zd 918 (Tex. 1962); State Board of Dental Examiners V, Fenlav. 357 S.W.Zd 185 (Tex. Civ. App. - Dallas 1962, no VI-it). The Pharmacy Act does not prevent a physician from charging a aeparllceree tar adnU.niSteY~ii``~ \r.T.ti;.S. art. 4 ~--s-l`` "Admlnlster" means the direct application of a prescription drug by injection,, inhalation, ingestion, or any other means to the body of a patient by: 0 a practiM&ner or an authorized agent under his supervIsion; or (W the pat:lent at the direction of a practitioner.
Id. 15(2). NorIs a physicl.anbarred from dispensing or distributing ~scriptioa drugs to his own patients.
Id. 119(a),(c). Therelevant terms are defined as follows: 7 (16) 'Dispense' means preparing, packaging, compounding, or labeling for delivery a prescription drug or device in the course of nrofessional . nractice io an ultimate user or his agent by or pursJ;mt to the lawful order of a oractltioner. p. 1381 Dr. Carlos D. Codinex - Page ,b (JM-304) (17) ‘Distribute’ means the delivery of a prescription dNg or device other than by administering or dispensing. (Emphasis added).
Id. 55(16), (171.However. he may not “operate e pharmacy for the ?6&iling of prescription drugs.”
Id. 119(c): seealso V.T.C.S. art. 4495b. 55.09(s). If a physician se% drugs to individual patients, even at cost, the pharmacy, act considers him to be operating a pharmacy for the retailing of drugs. - See Attorney General Opinion MW-410 (1981). Attorney General Opinion MW-410 (1981) construed section 19(c) of the Texas Pharmacy Act to prohibit the physician from charging a separate fee for drugs provided to the patient for self-medication. The opinion states as follow: We believe a physlc:Lanwho charges a separate fee for dispensing dNgS t0 a patient for self-medication engages in the retailing of drugs. When a physician retails drugs, he is engaging in the practice of pharmacy within the statutory definition. A physician may. however, administer drugs directly to IXLSpatients, see sections 5(g), 19(d). and we believe he maymake a separate charge for so d’o:Lngwithout engaging in the practice of pharmayf. ~ectio````e~e~ca``~a~tice Act. ConstNed in pari materis with section 19(c) of the Pharmacy Act, prohibits a physician from charging a fee to cover the cost of drugs supplied to a patient for self-medication. unless such physician practices in “a rural ares” as defined In article 5.09(b). You also ask: 2. If a physician may not be reimbursed for the cost of a drug product supplied to a patient under the clrcumutances described in the first question, are thaw any circumstances under which a physician may be reimbursed for the actual costs to the physician of a drug product supplied to a patient to meet the patfent’s immedfate needs, other than the* cfccumstances described in the new Section 5.09(b) oi’ the Medical Practice Act. which addresses the authority of rural physicians to dispense dangerous drugs? Section 5.09(b) and an identical provision codified as section 33(c) of article 4542a-1, V.T.C.S.. authorize a physician vho practices in a “rural area” to dispense dangerous drugs to his patients and be reimbursed for the cost of supplying the drugs. <’ ’ Dr. Cerlos D. Godinex - Page 5 (JM-304) “Rural *reel’ is defined rer;trictlvely. This narrow exception wes enacted to exempt rural physicians from the prohibition against charging a separate fee For prescription medicine supplied to patients. See Bill Anslys~ilito House Bill No. 1474, prepared for House Committee on Public Realth, filed in Bill File to Rouse Bill No. 1474. Legislative Reference 'LLbrary (bill which included 85.09(b) of article 4495b. V.T.C.S.. end 133(c) of article 4542a-1, V.T.C.S.). Section 5.09(b). as an exception to e general prohibition, should be strictly construed. -- liunslqer v. Boyd,
26 S.W.2d 905(Tex. 1930). Corpus Christi v. McClaugher~r,
284 S.W.2d 927(Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1955. writ ref'd). Unless he complies with the various requirements of section 5.OS(b), a physician who is not a licensed pharmacist may not be reimbursed for the cost of drugs supplied to meet a patient's immediate needs. SUMMARY A physician who supplies dangerous drugs or controlled substances to a patient under authority of section 5.09(a). article 4495b. V.T.C.S.. may not be reimbursed Eor the cost of the product supplied. Section 15.09(b) provides sn exception permitting rural physicians who come vithin its terms to charge o fee for the cost of drugs supplied to patients. Attorney General of Texas TOMGREBN First Assistant Attorney General DAVID R. RICEAXDS Executive Assistant Attorney General RICX GILPIN Chairman, Opinion Committee Prepared by Susan L. Garrison Assistant Attorney General p. 1383 Dr. Carlos D. Godlnez - Page 6 (JM-304) APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Rick Cilpin. Chairman Susan Garrison Jim Moellinger Jennifer Riggs p. 1384
Document Info
Docket Number: JM-304
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1985
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017