Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  • I
    .       .
    The Attome)’ General                      of Texas
    December 20,     1984
    M MAllOX
    I
    Attorney General
    ``feme cewl BUllOlng             Ronorable Mergeret Moore                     Opinion    No. JH-281
    P. 0. Box 12548                  Travis County Attoruc!)~
    ‘.rrtin. TX. 7.9711.
    2540          P. 0. Box 1740                               Re: When a county msy charge the
    W75-2501                      Austin,  Tex*s   7876’~                      optional $5.00 vehicle reglstra-
    **1*x QlolS71-1367
    tion fee
    Telecopier51214754l2S6
    Dear Ms. Moore:
    , A Jackson.Sulle 700
    DalIal. lx. 75202-4x4                                              article    6675a-9a.   V.T.C.S.,     with
    You have asked 11s to construe
    -4r742-Ss44
    regard to the time 111:which the optional     county vehicle    registration
    fee may be imposed an license  plate renewals.      The statutory     language
    4s24 Albem ha.. Suite ISO    about which you IoquLre reads as follow:
    -’ Paso. TX. 799052793
    y53534s4                                    (b) A county    may impose   a fee under   this
    section  onl:y to take effect beginning January 1 of
    rexae. sui1a700                     a year ending In a ‘5’ or a ‘0’. (Emphasis added).
    >usIo”. TX. 77002.3111
    7lY223-58m                   Section  3 of    the same act,   Rouse Bill       No. 965.     whose   first   section
    added article    6675a-9a. provides   that
    * Sroedw*y. Suit9 312
    Lubbwk. TX. 79401-3479
    A fee  imposed   by s county     under   Section
    Sw747.5238                               9a . . . applies   to a registration    period that
    begins on or after  the date the fee takes effect.
    (Emphasis added).
    009 N. Tenth. Suite B
    MeAllen.TX. 7s5o1-lw5
    r2t2J32a47                  Acts  1983, 68th Leg., ch. 022. st 4710.             Essentially.   you ask vhen it
    is eppropriate     for a county to begin charging the extra $5.00 fee.                 We
    conclude     that  e eaunty Vhose comissloners              court  has adopted       the
    IQ) Maln flua. Suite 400     optional    county vehicle     registretion     fee in compliance       vith   article
    an Antonio. TX. 782052797
    6675e-9a may begin ctlarging such fee only on January 1. 1985 and only
    ra22Ylsl
    with   regard to veh:lc:les which.        under the established       administrative
    construction,     becow! eligible     for registration      renewal on that date or
    thereafter.
    The uncertainty     which has led to your Inquiry               appears   to have
    been engendered       because     article      6675a-9a     has been imbedded       in a
    statutory    scheme of gear-round         vehicle    registration.     which replaced   a
    system that for fility        years contained          a uniform annual registration
    running    from April    :I to March 31.           Art.   6675a-1 et seq.      You have
    sugge~sted that either. the extra $5.00 fee should be assessed                   only on
    all registration      renewals     purchased      on or after      January 1. 1985. or
    gonorablr    Nargsret         Noore   - Pagtr 2      (rn-281)
    thst    the extra     $5.00        fee sh#xJld be assessed       on all    registrations
    expiring     on or after            Dscembc’r 31,     1984, even if the renewal            is
    purchased     during the         tvu months prior      to January 1. 1985.        Hovever,
    the well-•etablfshed            rule of Lw that statutes        vhfch fix fess are to
    be strictly     construed        against    allowing   a fee by implication      militntes
    agslnst    your suggested          couclur~ion.     Moore v. Sheppard, 192 S.W.Zd 559
    (Tex. 1946); UcLennan            County v, BOggsSb. 
    137 S.W. 346
    (Tex. 1911).
    Tour second suggested   anrlyels , that      the optloual  fee is meant to
    apply to all regfstratlons    exl,!iring on or after December 31. 1984. Is
    based on the tvo mouth time period during which you believe            a renewal
    may be purchased     prior  to its      expirstion.      Section   5 of article
    6675a-3e provides   that:
    license   plates           may tme purchased        during the month
    preceding     the          datl? on which           the   registration
    expires.
    Article     6675a-4(a)        provides      t’kat:
    Each registration     ye.ar . . . shall   . . . expire on
    the last     day of ,:he last     calendar    month in a
    registration    period.
    As an orfgifd      matter.    we might conclude        that the “month” referred  to
    in article    6675a-3s.    section   !i , was only the calendar month, 55 Tex.
    Jur. 2d Time 13 (1964).         pramding      the close     of business on the last
    day of thzery        month ia vhf,ch the registration          expired.  However. we
    agree   with    you that       chew      is  sufficient      ambiguity  that   it is
    reasouable    to reach the concl.u.sion that the time period during vhich a
    renaval may be purchased is the -two months preceding the date on vhich
    the registration     expires.
    Indeed, that is the conclusiou       arrived   at by the Texas Department
    of Highvays, es demonstrated. by the testimony              of gr. Robert Townsly.
    Director    of Motor Vehicle DQr:Lsion of the Texas Ugbway Department.              at
    a hearing      before      the Rouse Transportation          Cocmittee   wherein    he
    indicated     that    renewal   notices   would be sent out in the “month
    preceding    the month in vhict. the registration          is due.”    Bill Analysis
    to House Bill         No. 1924. (84th Leg.,      Legislative     Reference    Library
    (1975).     Llkavise,     the curwut    manual issued     to county tax assessor-
    collectors    by the Texas Department of Highways and Public Transporta-
    tion refers     to
    a   tvo-month registration    renewal     period  - the
    month      in
    which t’,w current    registration     expire5
    and the month immc:d.lately preceding    the expiration
    month.
    p.   121r3
    Uonotablo   Narpret     Moor. - Pallo 3      (JW281)
    State of Texas Lava and Saguiations              Relating     to the gcgistration          of
    Vehiclea    Sec. 3.(b)     II (1982).     See also &,          23s et seq.      Mile    the
    interpretation*        of statutea ude         by   lgcociea charged vith their
    administration are not con``ls1~1~0~           they should be given substantiel
    weight.      ?!x Parte   Roloff. 310 S.Y.Zd 913 (tes.            1974).     Nevertheleaa.
    -pi-t     d         mtqgp&ub    -lanw~r:ufira.    w.       LM -&+ul           ~mllbx       %
    vitiatea    the plain    meaning of’ the vordr “take effect”              in section     (b)
    of article       667Sa-9a.     Article     10. V.T.C.S..         requires     that   uorde
    routinely     be given their “ortllnary       signification.”          See Jones v. Del
    Anderson and Aasociateo, 539 S.U.Zd 346 (fex.                   1976).Webeter’r          New
    ColJegiate     Dictionary    define11 the term “tahe effect”               as “to become
    operative.”       Therefore,   the optional      fee mey be chrrged only on and
    after January 1. 1985.
    your first    suggested    analyale   of the timing of the implementation
    of the optiooal       fee accept8 this conclusion.         but results       in a strained
    lppllcation       of your construc:r,ion    of the phrase “registration period”
    in article     6675a-4 to section 1 in House Bill No. 965, n                        Therein
    “regirtration      period*    appears    to aean the rpan of tims of not more
    than twelve months for vhich a regintratioa                 is valid.       Its usage      in
    that provlsien seems to be the product of the fact that the Texas
    Department      of     Highways     YE,I authorized         to    establish      different
    registration      years for different       claeslfications         of vehicles      end to
    prorate annual registration           f,css on a monthly basia.             If the phrase
    “registration      period” means the same thing in article                  6675a-4 aa in
    section 3 of llouse Bill No. 965. it produces the follcuing                      lnomalous
    results:      (1) for the firat web registration               “period” to begin on or
    after     January    1, 1985. the two month period                 for the reneuel         of
    registretions       expired    on Del:emher 31, 1984; end (2) the tvo month
    period for the reneual of registratloaa              for the next such registration
    “period” extends from Decembw 1, 1964. to January 31. 1985. and thus
    reneuals     of registraclonr      exl~%ring on January 31 would not be rubject
    to the extra       $5.00 fee if Dnrchased before              January l.but       vould be
    subject    to that fee if purcha,ccd after December 31.
    Ye think ic uoreasonablc           to attribute      an intent     to create such
    absurd     results    to     the    l~gisleture.       especially      when    a   simple,
    strolghtfonard       explanation       of the plain        meaning of the lna c twnt
    (sections     1 and 3 of House B,L:LlNo. 965) is readily              apparent.      If the
    phrase “registration       period” .Ln section        3 is taken to mean the period
    for reneual       of registrations,         then all     tegistmtlone       which are     to
    expire on February 28, 1965, would be subject                   to the extra $5.00 fee
    during the entire       period of t:heir eligibility            for renewal (January 1
    through     February    26).     Such an lnterpretatlon            causes   no lnomelous
    results    snd is soundly groundSed in the princlplc               that the leginlaturc
    kncv the established         administrative      construction      of rrticle    667Sa-3e.
    section 5.
    p. 1244
    Wmorablo   Uaryret   lIooro - PawI 4   (Jb281)
    A eo unc  u hyich ohl e
    do p td tha opt-1      $5.00
    vehicle  re8iatrathw    fea uy be8in     cbaqin8    it
    oely on Jau~ry    1, 19885,end only for the reneud
    of relistratiooo    which  expire   oo Iebnury     28.
    1985.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOI4GRN6N
    pirrt Aoaiatant Attoraey    Genewl
    DAVID 1. RIGHARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney General
    PlQ( GILpIN
    t3drman.  Opinion   ColiCtee
    Prepared by Colin Carl
    Asaiatant Attonwy  General
    APpPsOvm:
    OPINIONCGIDIITTEE
    Rick Gilpin,  Glmirun
    Colin Gal
    Suaan Garrison
    Tony Guillory
    JimHoelliqer
    Jennifot   RIGGS
    Nancy Sutton
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-281

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017