Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                  The Attorney                     General             of Texas
    Dccambcr 20.        1904
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    suprome Court Bullding         Donorable   Tmmy Y. Wallace                                      Opinion      Do. .Df-277
    P. 0. Box 12548                Criminal   District   IStormy
    Austin. TX. 78711.2549         Van Zandt County Cmrthouse                                       Re:     Whether    a constahlo       who
    51214752501                    Canton,   Texan     751c3                                        has been     appointed    to fill       a
    Telex SlofS7&13S7
    vacancy    is authorized       to call
    Telecopier 5121475tJ288
    a meeting     of a county        griev-
    ance cosmlttee
    714 .J1EkSO”. SUIP 700
    Dallrr. TX. 7S2o2JsoB          Dear Dr.      Wallace:
    214l742-BB44
    You have      ask44    whether   the phrase    “elected      county    or precinct
    4S24 *,beft* Ave., s!Ne led    officer”     as used in sectfon       2(e) of article      3912K. V.T.C.S..      includes
    El P4s.a TX. 7SBOS.2793        a county     constable     ,who has been appointed     to fill      the vacancy    left   by
    915633-3484                    an elected     constab:le    who has been temporarily        suspended     from office    by
    the district      court.     Article   3912K. section     2(e)   provides:
    a1 Texas. suite 7M)
    Houston. TX. 77002.3111                       Any elected       county    or precinct        officer       who is
    713J223aSB                                    aggrievei     by the setting      of his   salary      or personal
    expenses      may within     5 days      of his      notification
    request      a hearing     before     the    salary       grievance
    SW Broadway. Suite 312
    colmllittec.    . . .
    Lubbock. TX. 79401-347s
    SOSl747-5238
    We conclude     that article    3912K. section     2(e) applies                        equally   to      anyone
    vho holds     the offi,ze    of constable     whether    he has                       been elected         in a
    43z4 N. Tenth. Suite B        general   election   or appointed     to fill    a vacancy.
    McAllen. TX. 7SSol~lea5
    512mS2-4517
    In general,         nt:atutory       language       ~311 be construed              to give      effect
    to the legislot.lw             Intent.        National         Surety    Corp.      v. Ladd,     115 S.U.Zd
    2CQ Main Plaza. Suite 400      600,     603 (Tex.         1938).        When necessary               to   fulfill       the    IeKislative
    San Antonio. TX. 78205-2797
    intent      and to effectuate           the legislative             purpose,       the meaning      of words
    512f225-4191
    vi11     be extended         beyond       or restrdcted            within      their     natural      import.
    Lunsford       v. City       of -Bryan.       
    297 S.W.2d 115
    .             117 (Tex.        1957);    Cit        of
    A” Equal OppOrtWWyl            Mason v.         Went Texas         Utilities         Company,         
    237 S.W.2d 273
    ,    27**
    Attirmative Action EmPlOW      1951).         It    is    our     opinion        that      it     would      not     comport      with       the
    legislative        lntenl:      behind      article       3912K to construe              the language           of
    the statute        litera,lly,       thereby       distinguishing           constables       vho have been
    elected        to    offiw        from      those       vho      have     been       appointed      to      fill
    vacancies.
    In Attorney          Ctmeral  Oploion     MW-111 (lYi9).     this    office   dlscussed
    the     status    of      a    person   appointed     to the    constitutional        office     of
    sheriff        to fill        an unexpired      term.    The question       addressed      in the
    ltoaorablo      Tosmy     Y. Wallace      - lhse      Z+~J&277)
    opinion concerned       the applicdbility      of article   4413(29aa).    V.T.C.S.     to
    :I sheriff   appointee.      Article   4513(29ae)    creetcd the Corission        on Law
    l?nforcsment    Officer Stsndartls and Education vhich sets standards                 for
    law enfnrcsment       officers      ia the   state.     The  provisions    of   article
    4413(29aa)     are qualified      by the specific       exemption    found in section
    6(f):
    Nothing herein       shol.1 be ~construed     . . . to affect
    ‘any sheriff , cowtable        or other      lav   enforcement
    officer      elected     under  the     provislons      of    the
    Constitution       of the State of Texas.
    In Attorney   General   Opluion      Mu-111 (1979).          this    office      construed
    section       6(f) to    exempt   from certification               those    persons        occupying
    constitutional        law enforcement         offices.         The opinion         concluded        that
    because      the constitutional         office      itself      vas    excepted        from article
    4413!?9aa),       it   was immaterf.al         that a person           held     the position           by
    appointment       rather     than   by popular           election,       despite        the    literal
    language       of the provision      ff..       both     elected      and appointed          sheriffs
    are exempted.        The   opinion   ,reasoned      as    follws:
    [Ilf      the    statute     were     construed        otherwise.         the
    requirements           of   the     statute        would       constitute
    qualifications           for the office.         There would be one
    set of qualifications              for    the office        if occupied
    by     an     appointee,       and     another       set     for     it     If
    occupied       by a pcrs.on popularly           elected      to it.
    Attorney       Crneral     Opinion     MR-111 (1979).
    Analogously,     we conc:lude     that     the phrase        “elected      county    or
    precinct    off ice?    as used in article         3912K must he construed           broadly
    to refer     to the elected     o:Fl’ice itself;       anyone holding        the offke      of
    constable      may   request   a hearing         before     the    grievance       committee
    regardless     of the manner by vhich       the constable       attained      his office.
    SUMMARY
    A constable          nay request     a hearing              hefore      a
    salary    grievance         committee    pursuant             to    article
    3912K.    V.T.C.S.,        whether    he has been              elected      or
    appointed    to his       office.
    JIN      MATTOX
    Attorney  General          of   Texas
    Honorable   tm     Y. Usllrce     a. P8ge 3 (a-277)
    TCH GREEN
    First Araistant    Attorney     Cawral
    DAVID R. RICHARDS
    Executive Assistnnt Attorne:r        General
    RlCK CILPIN
    Chairman. Opiniqn    Comittee
    Prepared    by Rick Gilpin
    Assistmt     Attorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINIONCOMMITTEE
    Rick Gll.pin. Chairman
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Tony Guillory
    Jim Hoellinger
    Jennifer   Riggs
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-277

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017