-
The Attorney General of Texas Dccambcr 20. 1904 JIM MATTOX Attorney General suprome Court Bullding Donorable Tmmy Y. Wallace Opinion Do. .Df-277 P. 0. Box 12548 Criminal District IStormy Austin. TX. 78711.2549 Van Zandt County Cmrthouse Re: Whether a constahlo who 51214752501 Canton, Texan 751c3 has been appointed to fill a Telex SlofS7&13S7 vacancy is authorized to call Telecopier 5121475tJ288 a meeting of a county griev- ance cosmlttee 714 .J1EkSO”. SUIP 700 Dallrr. TX. 7S2o2JsoB Dear Dr. Wallace: 214l742-BB44 You have ask44 whether the phrase “elected county or precinct 4S24 *,beft* Ave., s!Ne led officer” as used in sectfon 2(e) of article 3912K. V.T.C.S.. includes El P4s.a TX. 7SBOS.2793 a county constable ,who has been appointed to fill the vacancy left by 915633-3484 an elected constab:le who has been temporarily suspended from office by the district court. Article 3912K. section 2(e) provides: a1 Texas. suite 7M) Houston. TX. 77002.3111 Any elected county or precinct officer who is 713J223aSB aggrievei by the setting of his salary or personal expenses may within 5 days of his notification request a hearing before the salary grievance SW Broadway. Suite 312 colmllittec. . . . Lubbock. TX. 79401-347s SOSl747-5238 We conclude that article 3912K. section 2(e) applies equally to anyone vho holds the offi,ze of constable whether he has been elected in a 43z4 N. Tenth. Suite B general election or appointed to fill a vacancy. McAllen. TX. 7SSol~lea5 512mS2-4517 In general, nt:atutory language ~311 be construed to give effect to the legislot.lw Intent. National Surety Corp. v. Ladd, 115 S.U.Zd 2CQ Main Plaza. Suite 400 600, 603 (Tex. 1938). When necessary to fulfill the IeKislative San Antonio. TX. 78205-2797 intent and to effectuate the legislative purpose, the meaning of words 512f225-4191 vi11 be extended beyond or restrdcted within their natural import. Lunsford v. City of -Bryan.
297 S.W.2d 115. 117 (Tex. 1957); Cit of A” Equal OppOrtWWyl Mason v. Went Texas Utilities Company,
237 S.W.2d 273, 27** Attirmative Action EmPlOW 1951). It is our opinion that it would not comport with the legislative lntenl: behind article 3912K to construe the language of the statute litera,lly, thereby distinguishing constables vho have been elected to offiw from those vho have been appointed to fill vacancies. In Attorney Ctmeral Oploion MW-111 (lYi9). this office dlscussed the status of a person appointed to the constitutional office of sheriff to fill an unexpired term. The question addressed in the ltoaorablo Tosmy Y. Wallace - lhse Z+~J&277) opinion concerned the applicdbility of article 4413(29aa). V.T.C.S. to :I sheriff appointee. Article 4513(29ae) creetcd the Corission on Law l?nforcsment Officer Stsndartls and Education vhich sets standards for law enfnrcsment officers ia the state. The provisions of article 4413(29aa) are qualified by the specific exemption found in section 6(f): Nothing herein shol.1 be ~construed . . . to affect ‘any sheriff , cowtable or other lav enforcement officer elected under the provislons of the Constitution of the State of Texas. In Attorney General Opluion Mu-111 (1979). this office construed section 6(f) to exempt from certification those persons occupying constitutional law enforcement offices. The opinion concluded that because the constitutional office itself vas excepted from article 4413!?9aa), it was immaterf.al that a person held the position by appointment rather than by popular election, despite the literal language of the provision ff.. both elected and appointed sheriffs are exempted. The opinion ,reasoned as follws: [Ilf the statute were construed otherwise. the requirements of the statute would constitute qualifications for the office. There would be one set of qualifications for the office if occupied by an appointee, and another set for it If occupied by a pcrs.on popularly elected to it. Attorney Crneral Opinion MR-111 (1979). Analogously, we conc:lude that the phrase “elected county or precinct off ice? as used in article 3912K must he construed broadly to refer to the elected o:Fl’ice itself; anyone holding the offke of constable may request a hearing before the grievance committee regardless of the manner by vhich the constable attained his office. SUMMARY A constable nay request a hearing hefore a salary grievance committee pursuant to article 3912K. V.T.C.S., whether he has been elected or appointed to his office. JIN MATTOX Attorney General of Texas Honorable tm Y. Usllrce a. P8ge 3 (a-277) TCH GREEN First Araistant Attorney Cawral DAVID R. RICHARDS Executive Assistnnt Attorne:r General RlCK CILPIN Chairman. Opiniqn Comittee Prepared by Rick Gilpin Assistmt Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE Rick Gll.pin. Chairman Colin Carl Susan Garrison Tony Guillory Jim Hoellinger Jennifer Riggs
Document Info
Docket Number: JM-277
Judges: Jim Mattox
Filed Date: 7/2/1984
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 2/18/2017