Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  • .        .
    The Attorney General of Texas
    November 30, 1984
    JIM MAlTOX
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court BulldIng
    Ms. Joyce A. Hammer                        opinion   No.   m-236
    0. Box 12548                     Executive Director
    LitIn, TX. 7871% 254s              Board of Vocational llurac                 Re: Whether the Board of Voca-
    512l4752501                            Rxsminera                               tional Nurse Examiners may refuse
    Telex 9101STC1381
    1300 E. Anderson Lane!                     to accept an application   for re-
    3lecopier 51214750266
    Building C. Suite ‘281;                    newal of an expired license when
    Austin, Texas    787%!                     there Is an unresolved allegation
    714 Jackson. Suite 700                                                         before the board that the appli-
    -atlas. TX. 75202.4508
    cant has been practicing   without
    t4/74249u
    a current license
    324 Alberta   Ave..    Suite160    Dear Ma. Hamer:
    I Paso. TX. 7Bgofc2793
    Y15i5.353481                              You have requested an opinion about an issue of license              renewal
    that   has come beford! the Board of Vocational         Nurse Examiners.        You
    1ex.ss. suit0 700
    note    that   the act     governing    vocational   nurses,     article     452&z,
    P,   don, TX. 77002~3111            V.T.C.S.,    atates in section 10(a) that the board may refuse to issue
    713122MSSS                          or renev a license      I’cmrany of the reasons listed       therein,    including
    “unprofessional     or dishonorable     conduct that, in the opinion of the
    Board, Is likely to i.ecelve,      defraud, or injure the public.”        V.T.C.S.
    SOB Broadway. Suits 312
    Lubbock. TX. 79401.3479
    art. 4528~. $10(a) (911. You further inform us that Rule 231.81 of the
    081747.3238                        Rules and Regulations, of the Board of Vocational              Nurse Examiners,
    promulgated under the authority          of section   5(g) of article        4528~.
    defines    “unprofessicaal     conduct”    as tncluding     “(6) (E) practicing
    4309 N. Tenth. Suite 8
    IcAllen. TX. 7850%1685
    vocational    nursing ir, this state without a current Texas license.”           22
    121082.4547                        Tex. Admin. Code 1231.81 (1982).          Based on these two considerations,
    you ask whether the Board of Vocational Nurse Examiners may refuse to
    accept an application       for renewal of an expired vocational           nursing
    32   Main Ptaza. Suite 4M)
    license when there is an unresolved allegation           before the board that
    an Antonio.    TX. 7S20527i)~
    ~1212254191
    the applicant      has blitm practicing     as a vocstional     nurse without a
    current license,
    .n Equal OpportunItyI                   In our opinion,  the board may not refuse    to accept application
    xffirmative   Action   EclplOY6-   for renewal of erpir,ed licenses      on the ground that an unresolved
    allegation  that the chpplicaut has practiced under the expired license
    is pending before thlz board.    Such action would be Inconsistent    with
    section 8 of article  4528~. V.T.C.S.:
    (b) The Board shall notify each licensee about
    the expirac:f.on date of the person’s    license  at
    least  30 days before   the expiration   date.   The
    p. 1059
    Ma. Joyce A. Earner - Page 2          (J+236)
    Board by United St;ttes mail shall send with the
    notice an application   for license    renawal to the
    licensee’s   address   contained    in    the  Board’s
    records.   A licenstfe whose completed application
    for renewal is received     by the Board after     the
    expiration  date of the license   shall be charged a
    late fee.
    (c)  If a person’s    license has been expired for
    not more than 90 days. the person may renew the
    license   by paying      to the Board the required
    renewal fee    and ,% fee        that   is   one-half    the
    examination fee fol: the license.          If a person’s
    license has been ex?:lred for more than 90 days but
    less than two yea::a,        the person may renew the
    license by paying to the Board all unpaid renewal
    fees and a fee that is equal to the examination
    fee for the license.         If a person’s     license   has
    been expired for two years or more. the person may
    renew    the   licema        by    complying     with    the
    requirements    set    forth     in   substantive      rules
    adopted by the Board.
    (d) If a~ peram practices     vocational    nursing
    after the person’s   license has expired,    the person
    is an illegal      pmctitioner  and the Board may
    suspend or revoke the license.
    Section 8(c) of article       4528~. V.T.C.S.,  provides for automatic
    renewal of licenses      expired for less. than two years upon payment of
    renewal fees and late charg’ts.         If an applicant’s    license    has been
    expired   for two or more ye;lrs,       he may renew it by complying with
    requirements set forth in substantive       rules of the board.       Subsection
    8(d)   authorizes    the board to suspend or revoke a license              if the
    licensee   has practiced     after: the expiration   of his license.         Under
    this section,     the board may suspend or revoke a license automatically
    renewed under subsection      8(c) upon a finding that illegal      practice   has
    occurred.     An unresolved      aLLegation  of illegal    practice     under an
    expired license does not conrititute such a finding.
    Section  IO(a) states    various   grounds for which the board      may
    refuse     license renewal.    Thelie grounds include the following:
    (1)   violation    of this     Act or of any     rule,
    regulation,    or ordti!r issued   under this Act;
    .   .   .   .
    p. 1060
    Me. Joyce A. Hamar - Page 3        (JR-236)
    (9)  unprofessiom~l    or  dishonorable    conduct
    that, in the opinim      of the Board, is likely    to
    deceive,  defraud, o’c injure the public.   . . .
    We need not decide whether thlz board has authority under section 10(a)
    to delay license   renewal to determine whether section        10(a) grounds
    actually exist.   We believe   that practice   under an expired license      Is
    governed by section    8, which contemplates    that automatic relicensing
    will not be delayed to resolvs : a charge of practicing    under an expired
    license.   The board may not promulgate a rule that is inconsistent
    with its enabling statute.       See Kelly v. Industrial
    ,--                         Accident Board,
    
    358 S.W.2d 874
    , 876-77 (Tex. Civ. App. - Austin 1962. writ ref’d);
    Railroad Comnission of Texas v. Fort Worth 6 D.C. Railway Co.. 
    161 S.W.2d 560
    . 562 (Tex. Civ. ,G,o. - Austin 1942. writ ref’d           w.0.m.).
    Thus, the board may not refuse to accept an application          for license
    renewal merely because there! is an unresolved        allegation    that the
    licensee has practiced    under an expired license.
    The Board of Vocational Nurse Examiners nay not
    refuse an application     for license   renewal under
    section 8 of article   4528~. V.T.C.S.,   on the basis
    of an unresolved allegation   that the applicant has
    practiced  under an expired license.
    JIM     MATTOX
    Attorney General of Texas
    TOMGREEN
    First Assistant   Attorney   General
    DAVID R. RICRARDS
    Executive Assistant Attorney     General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion Committee
    Prepared by Susan L. Garrison
    Assistant Attorney General
    p. 1061
    Ms. Joyce A. Aatmer - Page 4       I:JM-236)
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMNITTEE
    Rick Gilpin, Chefmen
    Colin Carl
    Susan Garrison
    Tony Guillory
    Jim Moellinger
    Jennifer Riggs
    Nancy Sutton
    Bruce Youngblood
    p     1062
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-236

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017