Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion ( 1984 )


Menu:
  •                                    The Attorney General of Texas
    Novmber       14,   1984
    JIM MATTOX
    Attorney General
    Supreme Court Buildin
    Mr. Bruce     Rineman                                    Opinion     No. JM-230
    P. 0. Box 12540                  Executive     Secretary
    Austin. TX. 78711. 2548          Teacher Retirement     j:lstem       of   Texas          Re: Whether the Teacher Retire-
    5121475.2501                     1001 Trinity   Street                                    ment System may pay benefits
    Telex 9101874.1367
    Austin,  Texas     7a7o:t                                on behalf  of a minor child  to
    Telecopier   51214750266
    a managing conservator  who is
    not the child’s  parent
    714 Jackson. Suile 700
    Dallas, TX. 75202.4506
    Dear Mr. Rinemao:
    2141742.8944
    You ask (1) whether a non-parent        managing conservator   of a minor
    4824 Alberta Ave.. SuiIe   160   child  is authorized     to receive   and give receipt    for Texaa Retirement
    El Paso. TX. 79905-2793          System [hereinafter     TRS] survivor   benefits  on behalf   of the minor, and
    91515334484                      (2) whether the non-parent      managing conseNator    is authorized    to elect
    among benefits    paya>:le to the minor.
    ,001 Texas. Sulta 700
    Houston, TX. 77002.3111                 Controversies       over the powers of a managing conservator,                         either
    713122559S6                      parent     or non-parent,         arose     initially        because      guardianship       of    the
    person     and guardia:lship        of the estate           are distinct        positions.         See
    Prob. Code 5184(c).           Tsxas probate        law requires         that a court appoio=
    606 Broadway, Suite 312
    Lubbock. TX. 79401-3479
    guardian      of e minor’s         estate.        See Prob.         Code 1109(a);         see also
    SOSi747.5238                     Phillips     v. Phillti)s.       
    511 S.W.2d 748
              (Tex.    Civ.     App. - San Antonio
    1974, 00 vrit);ii;er              v. Southern         National       Life    Insurance     Company,
    326 S.W.Zd 715 3;~.              Civ.    App. - San Antonio                 1959,   writ    ref’d).
    4309 N. Tenth. Swte S
    Although a child’s        p,srent is the natural            guardian      of the person of the
    McAllen. TX. 78501.1585
    5121682.4547                     minor,     the law traditionally           limited     even a parent          to an entitlement
    to be appointed        guardian       of his child’s           estate;     he had no absolute
    right     to act.      Si.Lber.
    mm-           326 S.W.Zd at 717.                 Consequently,       Attorney
    200 Main Plaza. Suite ux)
    General      Opioioo     E-i35 (1973)          concluded        that     the    State    Employees
    San Antonio. TX. 78205-2797
    Retirement      System may not pay benefits                due minors to anyone except               a
    51212254191
    person     appointed     by a court          to receive        the benefit        payments.        See
    Prob.      Code   §109     (,guardian      of    estate);        5228, (guardian         appoins
    A” Equal Opportunitvl            specifically      to receive      government       funds).
    Atfirmatwe Act,“” ErWove-
    Several    years      later,      Attorney    General     Opinion     H-1214      (1978)
    determined    that section         12.04 of the Family Code, first            effective       in
    1974,   authorized     ila.rents
    --           to   receive   and   give    receipt     for    benefit
    payments due their        lninor child        from the Employees       Retirement       System
    without    the neceslzlty        of a formal       guardianship.        Attorney      General
    Opinion R-1214 construed            two subsections    of section      12.04 of the code
    p.   1032
    Mr. Bruce     Aineman - Page 2                     (JM-230)
    as limited exceptions   to the Seneral rule followed     in Attorney    General
    Opinion H-85.   At that time, two subsections    provided   as follows:
    [T]he   parent              of:     a child    has   the      following
    rights,   privileges,                 duties,   and powers:
    * .   .    .
    (4) the duty tolnaoage                    the estate of       the child,
    except    when a gucz:dian                   of  the estate         has been
    appointed;
    .   . . .
    (8) the power 1:~) receive    and give   receipt  for
    payments for the support       of the child   and to hold
    or disburse    anyfunds
    --       for   the benefit     of the
    child.   . . .  (Emp’~asis added).
    -Cf.   Acts   1983,       68th       Leg.,   ch.     1016 at 5436      (subsection    (4)    amended).
    Section    14.02(b)  of thsz Family Code has oo direct            corollary       to
    the parents’       duty in section       12.04(4)    to manage the minor’s        estate.
    As recently        amended,   however,      subsection    (6)  of   section     14.02(b)
    clearly     brings    some powers over a minor’s        estate  within    a non-parent
    managing conservator’s        author:lty:
    the power to reprwent             the child    in legal     action
    and to make other         ‘decisions    of substantial        legal
    significance       cooc:e,roing      the    child     fncludinn     .
    except when a guardian           of the child’s     est ate or a
    guardian      or attorney      ad litem     has been appointed
    for the child,      a p&er as an agent of the child               to
    act    in relation      fo     the child’s      estate     if    the
    -chil id’s action    is required      by a state,      the United
    States,    or a fore:z;n      government.     . . .     (Emphasis
    added).
    Acts 1983. 68th Leg..      ch. 10115, at 5437.                        V.T.C.S.   Tex. Fam. Code Ann.
    514.02(b)   (6).    (The emphasd,zed language                          also    amended the parents’
    estate    power provision,    sectllan 12.04(4).)
    Although    subsection     (6: of section      14.02(b)      does not create     as
    comprehensive     a power to mar,age a minor’s          estate     as the power held by
    parents,    it does authorize        action    in relation       to the child’s    estate
    when action     Is required     by ZI governmental      entity     and when a court has
    not appointed     a guardian     auth#Drized to receive        such payments.     The TRS
    “requires”     that an authorized         person   receive      payments   to avoid    the
    danger of incurring        double li,ability.     Thus, in response        to your first
    p.   1033
    Mr. Bruce     Hioeman - Page 3          (JM-230)
    question.     we conclude    that   section    14.02(b).     as amended, encompasses
    authorization       for a non-parent       managing     cooserzator    to receive  and
    give    receipt    for  governmeot     benefit    payments      such as TRS survivor
    benefits     unless and until     a formal guardianship        exists.
    Because election         among benefits       is an Incident         of receiving     such
    benefits,     we also answer yor.r second question               affirmatively.         Although
    section    34.404(d)      of Title       HOB, Public     Retirement       Systems,    refers     to
    election       of    benefits       for     minors    by    “their      guardian.”       section
    14.02(b)   (6) of the Family Code necessarily                    authorizes       a non-parent
    managing consexvetor           to ele:c’ among available          benefits.       As indicated
    at the ooset of this discusc;i.on , the general                 term “guardian”       ten apply
    to distinct       positions;     thus, section      34.404 may not have been intended
    to    require      election      of     tbenefits   by    a court-appointed           guardian.
    Nevertheless,        even if      the provision        requires      election     by a formal
    guardian,      section     14.02(b) (1i11, as amended, grants non-parent                managing
    conservators       the limited       “guardian”    power necessary         to elect among TRS
    survivor      benefits       so long      es oo formal        guardianship       exists.       -See
    Attorney     General Opinion H-1,2:14.
    SUMMARY
    Section      14.02(b)(6)       of the Texas Family Code
    authorizes      the non-parent        maoaging conservator      of
    a minor child        (1) to receive       and give receipt    for
    Texas     Retirement         System    survivor     benefits    on
    behalf    of   the minor,        and (2) to elect      amoog the
    benefit    options     wrailable     to the minor so long as
    no guardian of the child’s            estate    or a guardian   or
    attorney     ad litem,        has been      appointed     for the
    child.
    J In     N A T T 0 X
    Attorney  General of Texas
    TOM GREEN
    First Assistant        Attorney    General
    DAVID R. RICRARDS
    Executive Assistant         Attorne:r    General
    RICK GILPIN
    Chairman, Opinion        Committee
    p.   1034
    Mr. Bruce Rinemao - Page 4   (J&l-230)
    Preparedby JenniferRigge
    AeeietaotAttorney General
    APPROVED:
    OPINION COMMITTEE
    Rick Gilpio. Chairman
    Co110 Carl
    Susan Garrieoo
    Tooy Goillory
    Jim Moellinger
    JenniferRigge
    Nancy Sutton
    p. 1035
    

Document Info

Docket Number: JM-230

Judges: Jim Mattox

Filed Date: 7/2/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/18/2017